Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ciclobenzaprina para el tratamiento del dolor miofascial en adultos

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006830.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 08 July 2009see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Frederico MG Leite

    Correspondence to: Emergency Medicine and Evidence Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    [email protected]

  • Álvaro N Atallah

    Cochrane Brazil, Centro de Estudos de Saúde Baseada em Evidências e Avaliação Tecnológica em Saúde, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Regina El Dib

    Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Unesp ‐ Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brazil

  • Eduardo Grossmann

    Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

  • Eduardo Januzzi

    Emergency Medicine and Evidence Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Regis B Andriolo

    Department of Public Health, Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Brazil

  • Edina MK da Silva

    Emergency Medicine and Evidence Based Medicine, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Contributions of authors

Conceived the review: Frederico Mota Gonçalves Leite (FMGL)
Co‐ordinating the review: Álvaro Nagib Atallah (ANA)
Undertaking manual searches and screening results: FMGL and Édina da Silva (EK)
Organising retrieval of studies: FMGL and EK
Screening retrieved studies: FMGL and EK
Appraising quality of studies: FMGL and EK
Abstracting data from studies: FMGL, EJ and Regina El Dib (RED)
Writing to authors of studies for additional information: FMGL
Providing additional data about studies: FMGL, EJ and Eduardo Grossmann (EG)
Obtaining and screening data on unpublished studies: FMGL, RED, EK
Data management for the review: FMGL
Entering data into Review Manager (RevMan 5): FMGL
RevMan statistical data: FMGL, Régis Andriolo (RA), RED
Other statistical analysis not using RevMan: FMGL, RA and RED
Double entry of data: (data entered by one person: FMGL; data entered by second person: EK)
Interpretation of data: FMGL, EK, RA and RED
Statistical analysis: FMGL, RED and ANA
Writing the review: FMGL
Performing previous research that was the foundation of the present review: FMGL
Guarantor for the review: FMGL
Responsible for reading and checking review before submission: FMGL, ANA, EK, RA, EJ and RED
Responsible for updating: FMGL, RA, RED

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

  • Jessica Thomas for her help during our work.

  • Sylvia Bickley, PaPas Trials Search Co‐ordinator for her comments on the search strategy presented in the protocol.

  • Consumer referee comments: Jayne Harrison, Anne Peticolas and Amy Zelmer.

  • Peer referee comments: Helen Worthington, Michael A Turturro, Andrew Moore.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2009 Jul 08

Cyclobenzaprine for the treatment of myofascial pain in adults

Review

Frederico MG Leite, Álvaro N Atallah, Regina El Dib, Eduardo Grossmann, Eduardo Januzzi, Regis B Andriolo, Edina MK da Silva

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006830.pub3

2008 Apr 23

Cyclobenzaprine for the treatment of myofascial pain in adults

Protocol

Frederico MG Leite, Álvaro N Atallah, Regina El Dib, Eduardo Grossmann, Eduardo Januzzi, Régis B Andriolo, Edina MK da Silva

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006830.pub2

2007 Oct 17

Cyclobenzaprine for the treatment of myofascial pain in temporomandibular disorders

Protocol

Frederico MG Leite, Álvaro N Atallah, Regina P El Dib, Eduardo Grossmann, Eduardo Januzzi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006830

Notes

We performed a full search in May 2015 and August 2016 intending to complete a full update, but we did not identify any potentially relevant studies likely to change the conclusions. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. If appropriate, we will update the review if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitate major revisions.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.