Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Telemedicine for the support of parents of high‐risk newborn infants

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006818.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 13 June 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Neonatal Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Kenneth Tan

    Correspondence to: Monash Newborn, Monash Medical Centre/Monash University, Clayton, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Nai Ming Lai

    Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University, Sunway Campus, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia

Contributions of authors

KT and NL co‐wrote the protocol and search strategy. They also conducted searches, evaluations of the studies separately and wrote up the review jointly.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Southern Health, Australia.

    KT is employed by Monash Medical Centre, Southern Health and Monash University

  • Monash University Sunway Campus, Malaysia, Malaysia.

    NML is employed by Monash University Sunway Campus, Malaysia

External sources

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.

    Editorial support of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN275201100016C.

Declarations of interest

None declared by the authors.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the editors of the Cochrane Neonatal review group who have reviewed our protocol and review: Dr Roger Soll, Dr John Sinclair, Dr Jeffrey Horbar, Prof Michael Bracken and to Ms Diane Haugthon, Managing Editor of the Neonatal Review Group for her assistance leading to the publication of the protocol and review.

Editorial support of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN267200603418C.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Jun 13

Telemedicine for the support of parents of high‐risk newborn infants

Review

Kenneth Tan, Nai Ming Lai

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006818.pub2

2007 Oct 17

Telemedicine for the support of parents of high risk newborn infants

Protocol

Kenneth Tan, Nai Ming Lai

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006818

Differences between protocol and review

The following items have been added.

1. Search yields leading to selection of studies.

2. Description of studies and 'Risk of bias' assessment of the included study, with 'Risk of bias' summary and graph included.

3. Summary of results in RevMan and 'Summary of findings' table.

4. DIscussion, conclusions and abstract.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.