Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Traitement orthodontique en cas de supraclusion et de rétroversion des dents avant supérieures chez les enfants

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 18 October 2006see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Oral Health Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Declan T Millett

    Correspondence to: Oral Health and Development, Cork University Dental School and Hospital, Cork, Ireland

    [email protected]

  • Susan Cunningham

    Department of Orthodontics, Eastman Dental Institute, UCL, London, UK

  • Kevin D O'Brien

    Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

  • Philip E Benson

    Academic Unit of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, Sheffield, UK

  • Alison Williams

    Oral Health Services Research and Dental Public Health, GKT Dental Institute, London, UK

  • Cesar M de Oliveira

    Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

This review was conceived by Declan Millett (DTM), Kevin O'Brien (KOB) and Susan Cunningham (SJC). The protocol was written by DTM, KOB and Cesar de Oliveira (CMO). The review was co‐ordinated by DTM and CMO. DTM and CMO developed the search strategy with the help of Anne Littlewood (Sylvia Bickley in the original review), Trials Search Co‐ordinator for the Cochrane Oral Health Group, who undertook the electronic searches. Handsearching was undertaken by DTM, SJC, CMO, Philip Benson (PB), KOB and Alison Williams (AW). Screening of the search results was undertaken by DTM and CMO. Appraisal of the quality of papers, data extraction, analysis and interpretation of data were undertaken by DTM, SJC, CMO, PB, KOB and AW. DTM, CMO, SJC and KOB wrote the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University College Cork, Ireland.

  • University of London, UK.

  • University of Manchester, UK.

  • University of Sheffield, UK.

External sources

  • British Orthodontic Society (BOS), UK.

    The BOS have provided funding for the Cochrane Oral Health Group Global Alliance (see www.ohg.cochrane.org)

Declarations of interest

available in

None known.

Acknowledgements

available in

We wish to thank Sylvia Bickley and Anne Littlewood (Cochrane Oral Health Group) for their assistance with literature searching and Luisa Fernandez Mauleffinch (Cochrane Oral Health Group) for her help with the preparation of this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Feb 01

Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Review

Declan T Millett, Susan J Cunningham, Kevin D O'Brien, Philip E Benson, Cesar M de Oliveira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub4

2017 Oct 02

Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Review

Declan T Millett, Susan J Cunningham, Kevin D O'Brien, Philip E Benson, Cesar M de Oliveira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub3

2006 Oct 18

Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and retroclined upper front teeth in children

Review

Declan T Millett, Susan Cunningham, Kevin D O'Brien, Philip E Benson, Alison Williams, Cesar M de Oliveira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005972.pub2

2006 Apr 19

Orthodontic treatment for deep bite and upright upper front teeth in children

Protocol

Declan T Millett, Susan Cunningham, Kevin D O'Brien, Philip Benson, Alison Williams, Cesar M de Oliveira

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005972

Differences between protocol and review

The methods section of this review has been updated in line with the latest version of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011) (Higgins 2011). 'Quality assessment' of included studies has been changed to 'Assessment of risk of bias of included studies'.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.