Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 1 Physical signs (any attacks in last 2 weeks, high=poor, short term).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 1 Physical signs (any attacks in last 2 weeks, high=poor, short term).

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, HRSA, high=poor).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, HRSA, high=poor).

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 3 Leaving the study early (endpoint data, short term).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM, Outcome 3 Leaving the study early (endpoint data, short term).

Comparison 2 INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS, Outcome 1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS, Outcome 1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 1 Physical signs (endpoint data, short term, high=poor).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 1 Physical signs (endpoint data, short term, high=poor).

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, SCL‐90, high =poor).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, SCL‐90, high =poor).

Study

Intervention

Mean

sd

N

Notes

Interview data (ICIDH, high=poor)

Moene 2003

Hypnosis

13.2

10.6

20

Moene 2003

Controls

16.6

11.7

23

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 3 Physical disability.

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 4 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.4

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 4 Leaving the study early ‐ short term.

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 5 Hypnotisability (baseline, SHCS, high =good).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.5

Comparison 3 OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST, Outcome 5 Hypnotisability (baseline, SHCS, high =good).

Comparison 1. INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Physical signs (any attacks in last 2 weeks, high=poor, short term) Show forest plot

1

30

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.17 [0.02, 1.22]

2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, HRSA, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

30

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐3.73 [‐6.96, ‐0.50]

3 Leaving the study early (endpoint data, short term) Show forest plot

1

30

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. INPATIENT PARADOXICAL INTENTION THERAPY (PI) versus OUTPATIENT DIAZEPAM
Comparison 2. INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Leaving the study early ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

49

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.14, 5.79]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + HYPNOSIS versus INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAMME + INDIVIDUAL SESSIONS
Comparison 3. OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Physical signs (endpoint data, short term, high=poor) Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.29, 2.91]

1.1 Observation (VRMC, high =good)

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.10 [1.29, 2.91]

2 Mental state (endpoint data, short term, SCL‐90, high =poor) Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐12.30 [‐44.28, 19.68]

3 Physical disability Show forest plot

Other data

No numeric data

3.1 Interview data (ICIDH, high=poor)

Other data

No numeric data

4 Leaving the study early ‐ short term Show forest plot

1

49

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.08 [0.42, 10.34]

5 Hypnotisability (baseline, SHCS, high =good) Show forest plot

1

43

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐1.09, 0.89]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. OUTPATIENT HYPNOSIS versus WAITING LIST