Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

This protocol has been withdrawn

view version history

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004948.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 18 May 2017see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Neonatal Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Colm PF O'Donnell

    Correspondence to: Department of Neonatology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin 2, Ireland

    [email protected]

  • Peter G Davis

    The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

    The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia

  • Colin J Morley

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

  • University of Melbourne, Australia.

External sources

  • Murdoch Childrens Reseacrh Institute, Australia.

  • National Health and Medical Reseach Council, Australia.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2017 May 18

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

Protocol

Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004948.pub2

2004 Oct 18

Endotracheal intubation versus face mask for newborns resuscitated with positive pressure ventilation at birth

Protocol

Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis, Colin J Morley

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004948