Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

تک‐دوز پاراستامول (استامینوفن) خوراکی در مدیریت درمانی درد پس از جراحی در بزرگسالان

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004602.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 08 October 2008see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Laurence Toms

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Henry J McQuay

    Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

  • Sheena Derry

    Correspondence to: Oxford, UK

    [email protected]

  • R Andrew Moore

    Plymouth, UK

Contributions of authors

For the updated review (2008): LT and SD identified studies for inclusion, carried out data extraction, analysis and writing. RAM was involved with analysis and writing. HJM acted as arbitrator and was involved with writing.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Oxford Pain Research Funds, UK.

External sources

  • NHS Cochrane Collaboration Grant Scheme, UK.

Declarations of interest

RAM & HJM have consulted for various pharmaceutical companies. RAM & HJM have received lecture fees from pharmaceutical companies that market analgesics and other healthcare interventions. RAM, HJM and SD have received research support from charities, government and industry sources at various times, but no such support was received for this work.

Acknowledgements

Jodie Barden and Jayne Rees were authors on the 2004 update of this review. Sally Collins and Dawn Carroll were authors on the first published version of this review (before the title was split) (Moore 1998b). Thanks to Martin Tramer, Marie Bisercic and Anna Oldman for translating reports, and Clare Abbott at the Cairns Library, The Churchill Hospital, for her help with obtaining papers.

Previous versions of this review received funding from Oxford Pain Research Funds, UK, Anglia and Oxford RHA, UK, NHS Research and Development Health Technology Evaluation Programmes, UK, European Union Biomed 2 Grant no. BMH4 CT95 0172, UK. The current update is supported by a Cochrane NHS Grant, UK.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2008 Oct 08

Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults

Review

Laurence Toms, Henry J McQuay, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004602.pub2

2004 Jan 26

Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain

Review

J Barden, J Edwards, A Moore, H McQuay

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004602

Differences between protocol and review

This update includes outcomes that were not considered for the protocol in the original review. This reflects increased understanding of the clinical trial data over the past 10 years or more, in part because of the results of systematic reviews. Use of individual patient data, rather than averages, has also helped shape different attitudes to outcomes, as has the input from professionals and consumers.

Notes

This review was first published as a Cochrane systematic review by Moore et al entitled: 'Single dose paracetamol (acetaminophen) with and without codeine for postoperative pain' , published in 1998. The original review has been split into two reviews: paracetamol alone, and paracetamol plus codeine. Paracetamol alone was updated and published as a Cochrane review by Barden et al in 2004. This review is an update of the 2004 review on 'Single dose oral paracetamol (acetaminophen) for postoperative pain in adults'.

October 2017

A restricted search in September 2017 did not identify any potentially relevant studies. Therefore, this review has now been stabilised following discussion with the authors and editors. If appropriate, we will update the review if new evidence likely to change the conclusions is published, or if standards change substantially which necessitate major revisions.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.