Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Related content

Jump to:

Related reviews and protocols

Topics

Topics

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 1 Relative risk of mortality.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Mortality, Outcome 1 Relative risk of mortality.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 2 Use of computed tomography (CT), Outcome 1 Difference in CT frequency.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Use of computed tomography (CT), Outcome 1 Difference in CT frequency.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 3 Use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), Outcome 1 Difference in DPL frequency.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), Outcome 1 Difference in DPL frequency.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 4 Cost‐effectiveness, Outcome 1 Direct costs per patient (US$).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Cost‐effectiveness, Outcome 1 Direct costs per patient (US$).

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 5 Laparotomy, Outcome 1 Laparotomy rate.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Laparotomy, Outcome 1 Laparotomy rate.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 6 Reduction in diagnostic time, Outcome 1 Mean reduction in diagnostic time (minutes).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Reduction in diagnostic time, Outcome 1 Mean reduction in diagnostic time (minutes).

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 7 Delayed diagnoses, Outcome 1 Risk of delayed diagnosis.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Delayed diagnoses, Outcome 1 Risk of delayed diagnosis.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 8 Non‐therapeutic laparotomy, Outcome 1 Risk of non‐therapeutic laparotomy.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Non‐therapeutic laparotomy, Outcome 1 Risk of non‐therapeutic laparotomy.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 9 Duration of hospital stay, Outcome 1 Mean length of stay (days).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Duration of hospital stay, Outcome 1 Mean length of stay (days).

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 10 Intensive care, Outcome 1 Mean ICU days.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Intensive care, Outcome 1 Mean ICU days.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab
Comparison 1. Mortality

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Relative risk of mortality Show forest plot

3

1254

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.00 [0.50, 2.00]
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Mortality
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 2. Use of computed tomography (CT)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Difference in CT frequency Show forest plot

4

1462

Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.52 [‐0.83, ‐0.21]
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Use of computed tomography (CT)
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 3. Use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Difference in DPL frequency Show forest plot

2

1016

Risk Difference (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.11, ‐0.02]
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL)
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 4. Cost‐effectiveness

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Direct costs per patient (US$) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Cost‐effectiveness
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 5. Laparotomy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Laparotomy rate Show forest plot

3

1131

Risk Difference (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.04, 0.04]
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Laparotomy
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 6. Reduction in diagnostic time

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mean reduction in diagnostic time (minutes) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 6. Reduction in diagnostic time
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 7. Delayed diagnoses

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Risk of delayed diagnosis Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 7. Delayed diagnoses
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 8. Non‐therapeutic laparotomy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Risk of non‐therapeutic laparotomy Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 8. Non‐therapeutic laparotomy
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 9. Duration of hospital stay

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mean length of stay (days) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 9. Duration of hospital stay
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 10. Intensive care

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Mean ICU days Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 10. Intensive care
Navigate to table in Review