Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004439.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 06 September 2013see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Lucieni O Conterno

    Correspondence to: Department of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Marilia Medical School, Marilia, Brazil

    [email protected]

  • Marilia D Turchi

    Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Goiania, Brazil

Contributions of authors

Prof Lucieni Oliveira Conterno screened studies for inclusion, performed data extraction and analyses, interpreted results and wrote the review. Prof Conterno is the guarantor of the review.

Prof Marilia Dalva Turchi screened studies for inclusion, performed data extraction and analyses, interpreted results and wrote the review update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Marilia Medical School, Brazil.

  • Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goias, Brazil.

External sources

  • MDT has a scholarship from the Brazilian National Research Council (Bolsa de Produtividade CNPq), Brazil.

  • MDT is a research member of the National Institute of Science and Technology for Health Technology Assessment (IATS), Brazil.

Declarations of interest

Lucieni O Conterno ‐ none known
Marilia D Turchi ‐ none known

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof Carlos Rodrigues da Silva Filho for his contribution to the first version of the review.

We are very grateful to Dr Karla Soares Weiser for her suggestions on the protocol and the Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre for assistance during the review. We are very grateful to Lesley Gillespie for searching for the studies and help during the editorial process, Joanne Elliott for updating the search, and Lindsey Elstub, Helen Handoll, Lesley Gillespie, Vicki Livingstone, Janet Wale and Geert Walenkamp for valuable comments and guidance during this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Sep 06

Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults

Review

Lucieni O Conterno, Marilia D Turchi

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004439.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults

Review

Lucieni O Conterno, Carlos Rodrigues da Silva Filho

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004439.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Antibiotics for treating chronic osteomyelitis in adults

Protocol

Lucieni O Conterno, Carlos Rodrigues da Silva Filho

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004439

Differences between protocol and review

  1. In line with Collaboration recommendations, we assessed the risk of bias in included studies.

  2. We have made several amendments to the types of outcome measures since the protocol was published.

    1. We clarified that treatment failure also includes early termination of treatment, such as for adverse effects or disease complications such as amputation.

    2. We added superinfection as a secondary outcome.

    3. We removed squamous cell carcinoma as a potential adverse event of treatment.

    4. We deleted length of hospital stay and cost from 'Adverse events' and placed them under 'Resource use'.

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Study flow diagram.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 1 Remission at the end of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 1 Remission at the end of treatment.

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 2 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 2 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment.

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 3 Mild adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 3 Mild adverse events.

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 4 Moderate or severe adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 4 Moderate or severe adverse events.

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 5 Superinfection.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB), Outcome 5 Superinfection.

Comparison 2 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral plus oral antibiotic, Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of the treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral plus oral antibiotic, Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of the treatment.

Comparison 2 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral plus oral antibiotic, Outcome 2 Adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Oral antibiotic versus parenteral plus oral antibiotic, Outcome 2 Adverse events.

Comparison 3 Parenteral plus oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotic, Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Parenteral plus oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotic, Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment.

Comparison 3 Parenteral plus oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotic, Outcome 2 Adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Parenteral plus oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotic, Outcome 2 Adverse events.

Comparison 4 Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin), Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of the treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin), Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of the treatment.

Comparison 4 Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin), Outcome 2 Adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin), Outcome 2 Adverse events.

Comparison 4 Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin), Outcome 3 Superinfection.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin), Outcome 3 Superinfection.

Comparison 5 Oral antibiotic 1 (ciprofloxacin) versus oral antibiotic 2 (lomefloxacin), Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Oral antibiotic 1 (ciprofloxacin) versus oral antibiotic 2 (lomefloxacin), Outcome 1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment.

Comparison 5 Oral antibiotic 1 (ciprofloxacin) versus oral antibiotic 2 (lomefloxacin), Outcome 2 Adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Oral antibiotic 1 (ciprofloxacin) versus oral antibiotic 2 (lomefloxacin), Outcome 2 Adverse events.

Comparison 1. Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission at the end of treatment Show forest plot

4

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.92, 1.18]

2 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment Show forest plot

3

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.78, 1.13]

3 Mild adverse events Show forest plot

3

118

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.49, 2.42]

4 Moderate or severe adverse events Show forest plot

3

91

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.19, 2.57]

5 Superinfection Show forest plot

3

124

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.33, 3.60]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Oral antibiotic versus parenteral antibiotic (AB)
Comparison 2. Oral antibiotic versus parenteral plus oral antibiotic

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of the treatment Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Oral antibiotic versus parenteral plus oral antibiotic
Comparison 3. Parenteral plus oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotic

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Parenteral plus oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotic
Comparison 4. Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of the treatment Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Superinfection Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Parenteral antibiotic 1 (ceftazidime) versus parenteral antibiotic 2 (ticarcillin plus tobramycin)
Comparison 5. Oral antibiotic 1 (ciprofloxacin) versus oral antibiotic 2 (lomefloxacin)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Remission at least 12 months after the end of treatment Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Oral antibiotic 1 (ciprofloxacin) versus oral antibiotic 2 (lomefloxacin)