Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Estrategias con antibióticos para erradicar la Pseudomonas aeruginosa en pacientes con fibrosis quística

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub5Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 25 April 2017see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Simon C Langton Hewer

    Correspondence to: Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK

    [email protected]

  • Alan R Smyth

    Division of Child Health, Obstetrics & Gynaecology (COG), School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Contributions of authors

Damian Wood wrote the first draft of the review and both Damian Wood and Alan Smyth edited it to produce the final original review version. Both Damian Wood and Alan Smyth have worked on updated versions of the review up until 2007. As from Issue 2, 2009 the new lead author is Simon Langton Hewer. The most recent version of the review was jointly written by Simon Langton Hewer and Alan Smyth.

Simon Langton Hewer acts as guarantor of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.

Declarations of interest

Dr Langton Hewer is the lead investigator on the ongoing trial Torpedo‐CF: Trial of Optimal Therapy for Pseudomonas Eradication in Cystic Fibrosis.

Prof Smyth declares relevant activities of membership of a Raptor steering committee, consultancies for Raptor, Gilead, Vertex, Roche and PTC. Actavis provide support for CF team educational activities.

Clarification statement added from Kevin Southern, Cystic Fibrosis Editor on 27 February 2020: This review was found by the Cochrane Funding Arbiters, post‐publication, to be noncompliant with theCochrane conflict of interest policy, which includes the relevant parts of theCochrane Commercial Sponsorship Policy. The review will be updated by February 2021; the update will have a majority of authors and lead author free of conflicts.

Current version (post‐publication): Dr Langton Hewer is the lead investigator on the ongoing trial Torpedo‐CF: Trial of Optimal Therapy for Pseudomonas Eradication in Cystic Fibrosis, he has no financial conflicts of interest.

Prof Smyth declares relevant activities of membership of a Raptor steering committee, consultancies for Raptor, Gilead, Vertex, Roche and PTC. Actavis provide support for CF team educational activities.

Acknowledgements

Hazel Bunn assisted in formulation of the review protocol. We would also like to thank Dr Damian Wood for his input into the original version of this review and subsequent updates until November 2007.

This project was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group. The views and opinions expressed therein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Systematic Reviews Programme, NIHR, NHS or the Department of Health.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Jun 02

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Simon C Langton Hewer, Sherie Smith, Nicola J Rowbotham, Alexander Yule, Alan R Smyth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub6

2017 Apr 25

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Simon C Langton Hewer, Alan R Smyth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub5

2014 Nov 10

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Simon C Langton Hewer, Alan R Smyth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub4

2009 Oct 07

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Simon C Langton Hewer, Alan R Smyth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Review

Damian M Wood, Alan R Smyth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Antibiotic strategies for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Protocol

Damian M Wood, Alan R Smyth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004197

Differences between protocol and review

2014

The inclusion criteria have been changed to include participants who have received study treatment within six months of the first isolation of P aeruginosa (previously not more than two months). This is to reflect differences in clinical practice between Europe and North America and to allow trials from earlier decades (where early treatment of P aeruginosa was not established clinical practice) to be included. A large trial (306 participants), published in 2011, is therefore now eligible for inclusion (Treggiari 2011). However, it is possible that, where infection has been present for as long as six months, it may have become more difficult to eradicate.

In recent years 28 days of inhaled tobramycin has been recommended as 'standard of care' for eradication of P aeruginosa in guidelines (Döring 2012). This has been reflected in trial design, where investigators have designed their trials to ensure that all participants receive an initial 28‐day course of inhaled tobramycin before randomisation to the next stage of therapy. We have therefore altered our eligibility criteria to allow trials where all participants receive some eradication therapy before randomisation (Treggiari 2011).

We have added cost as an outcome measure, as cost‐effectiveness has become increasingly important in CF care. None of the trials included to date have reported this outcome but future trials may do so.

2009

After the new lead reviewer re‐assessed the review, the section 'Objectives' was expanded to include the sentence:

'To investigate whether there is evidence of superiority or improved cost‐effectiveness between antibiotic strategies.'

Currently, we have included both P aeruginosa‐free and P aeruginosa‐naive individuals according to the definition by Lee (Lee 2003). At the update in 2009 we have added plans to analyse these subgroups separately if sufficient data become available from included studies in the future.

2005

Two clinically relevant additional outcomes were added at review stage to the ones we had originally listed:

  1. Time to chronic infection (defined as the presence of P aeruginosa in each monthly sputum sample for six consecutive months or the presence of precipitating antibodies to P aeruginosa or both)

  2. Clinical and radiological scores

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (300 mg 2x daily).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (300 mg 2x daily).

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (80 mg 2x daily).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 2 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (80 mg 2x daily).

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined available case analysis).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 3 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined available case analysis).

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined) ‐ best case.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 4 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined) ‐ best case.

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined) ‐ worst case.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 5 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined) ‐ worst case.

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 6 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 6 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 7 Adverse events.

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 8 Modified Shwachmann score ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo, Outcome 8 Modified Shwachmann score ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 2 Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Proportion colonised with P aeruginosa.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Proportion colonised with P aeruginosa.

Comparison 3 Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa.

Comparison 3 Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 2 Adverse events.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 2 Adverse events.

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 1 Time to next isolation of P aeruginosa from BAL, sputum or oropharyngeal cultures.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 1 Time to next isolation of P aeruginosa from BAL, sputum or oropharyngeal cultures.

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 2 Number of respiratory exacerbations.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 2 Number of respiratory exacerbations.

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 3 Adverse events (up to 3 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 3 Adverse events (up to 3 months).

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 4 Adverse events (over 3 months).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4 Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days, Outcome 4 Adverse events (over 3 months).

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa.

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 2 FEV₁ % predicted (relative change from baseline).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 2 FEV₁ % predicted (relative change from baseline).

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 3 Microbiology status (post‐trial).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.3

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 3 Microbiology status (post‐trial).

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 4 Adverse events leading to trial discontinuation.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.4

Comparison 5 Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin, Outcome 4 Adverse events leading to trial discontinuation.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 1 Participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from respiratory tract.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 1 Participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from respiratory tract.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 2 FEV₁ % predicted ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 2 FEV₁ % predicted ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 3 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 3 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 4 Height (cm) ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 4 Height (cm) ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 5 Time to severe pulmonary exacerbation.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 5 Time to severe pulmonary exacerbation.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 6 Participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbations.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 6 Participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbations.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 7 Time to pulmonary exacerbation (any severity).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 7 Time to pulmonary exacerbation (any severity).

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 8 Participants with one or more pulmonary exacerbations (any severity).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 8 Participants with one or more pulmonary exacerbations (any severity).

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 9 Participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 9 Participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 10 Participants with one or more serious adverse event.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.10

Comparison 6 Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 10 Participants with one or more serious adverse event.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 1 Participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from respiratory tract.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 1 Participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from respiratory tract.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 2 FEV₁ % predicted ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 2 FEV₁ % predicted ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 3 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.3

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 3 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 4 Height (cm) ‐ change from baseline.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.4

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 4 Height (cm) ‐ change from baseline.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 5 Time to severe pulmonary exacerbation.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.5

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 5 Time to severe pulmonary exacerbation.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 6 Participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbations.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.6

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 6 Participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbations.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 7 Time to pulmonary exacerbation (any severity).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.7

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 7 Time to pulmonary exacerbation (any severity).

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 8 Participants with one of more pulmonary exacerbation (any severity).
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.8

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 8 Participants with one of more pulmonary exacerbation (any severity).

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 9 Participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.9

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 9 Participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 10 Participants with one or more serious adverse event.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.10

Comparison 7 Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin, Outcome 10 Participants with one or more serious adverse event.

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Inhaled tobramycin compared with placebo

Inhaled tobramycin compared with placebo for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: inhaled tobramycin

Comparison: placebo

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo

Inhaled tobramycin

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract:

Proportion with positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa

Follow‐up: 2 months (further results reported up to 2 years)

682 per 1000

102 per 1000

(20 to 443 per 1000)

OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.65)

38
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2,3

The two studies gave very different doses of inhaled tobramycin (80 mg or 300 mg 2x daily).

Results across different time points and sensitivity analyses to account for missing data in one trial were variable, showing no consistently significant advantage to inhaled tobramycin over placebo.

FEV

Follow‐up: up to 2 years

There were no changes in spirometric pulmonary function during or after the treatment period.

NR

up to 224
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3,5

No numerical data were reported.

FVC

Follow‐up: up to 2 years

There were no changes in spirometric pulmonary function during or after the treatment period.

NR

up to 224
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3,5

No numerical data were reported.

Growth and nutritional status: change in weight (kg) from baseline

Follow‐up: up to 2 months

The mean change in weight from baseline was 0.3 kg in the placebo group.

The mean change in weight from baseline was 0.1 kg higher (0.38 kg lower to 0.58 kg higher)

in the inhaled tobramycin group.

NA

21
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low1,3

There was also no difference in the mean change in weight from baseline between groups at 1 month MD 0.20 kg (95% CI ‐0.28 to 0.68).

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: number of exacerbations per patient year

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: number of positive cultures per patient year

Follow‐up: up to 2 months

There were no changes in the prevalence of other micro‐organisms, including multi‐resistant organisms, cultured from respiratory secretions.

NR

21
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3,5

No numerical data were reported.

Adverse effects to antibiotics: cough

Follow‐up: up to 2 months

923 per 1000

535 per 1000

(28 to 1000 per 1000)

OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.03 to 10.86)

21
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,3,6

No other specific adverse events were reported.

The other included study in this comparison stated that there was no evidence of a difference in serum creatinine levels or auditory threshold between the groups.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity;MD: mean difference; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded once due to risk of bias; methodological information was limited and unclear in the included studies and there were concerns regarding incomplete outcome data, selective reporting and other biases due to the early termination of one study.

2. Downgraded once due to imprecision: wide confidence intervals around the pooled effect and variable results shown at different time points.

3. Downgraded once due to applicability: the included studies recruited only children; results are not applicable to adults.

4. In the included trial, 22 participants were randomised but it is not clear if all participants contributed to this outcome.

5. Downgraded once due to imprecision: no numerical results available.

6. Downgraded once due to imprecision: very wide confidence intervals around the effect size.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Inhaled tobramycin compared with placebo
Summary of findings 2. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin compared with no treatment

Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin compared with no treatment for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P. aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin

Comparison: no treatment

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

No treatment

Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported

NA

NA

NA

FEV₁

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported

NA

NA

NA

FVC

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported

NA

NA

NA

Growth and nutritional status

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported

NA

NA

NA

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: number of exacerbations per patient year

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported

NA

NA

NA

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: number of positive cultures per patient year

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported

NA

NA

NA

Adverse effects to antibiotics

Follow‐up: 27 months

No adverse effects were reported in either group

NR

26

(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low1,2,3

No numerical data were reported.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported; P aeruginosa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. Downgraded once due to risk of bias; methodological information was limited and unclear in the included study and there was a high risk of bias due to lack of blinding.

2. Downgraded once due to applicability: the included study recruited only children; results are not applicable to adults.

3. Downgraded once due to imprecision: no numerical results available.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 2. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin compared with no treatment
Summary of findings 3. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin compared to inhaled tobramycin

Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin compared to inhaled tobramycin for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin

Comparison: inhaled tobramycin

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Inhaled tobramycin

Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract: Proportion with positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa

Follow‐up: up to 24 months

458 per 1000

348 per 1000

(110 to 1000 per 1000)

OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.24 to 2.42)

up to 581
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,4

There was also no significant difference between treatment groups within the first 6 months, OR 0.43 (95% CI 0.15 to 1.23).

FEV₁: change from baseline (% predicted)

Follow‐up: up to 24 months

Median change from baseline in FEV₁ (% predicted) for all the participants was ‐1%.

NR

up to 581
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,5

Changes in FEV₁ are not reported separately for each treatment arm.

FVC

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Growth and nutritional status: BMI and weight z score

Follow‐up: up to 24 months

Both BMI z score and weight z score were reported not to have changed significantly for trial participants as a whole.

NR

up to 581
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,5

Numerical data were not reported for comparative results across the treatment groups.

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: number of exacerbations per patient year

Follow‐up: up to 24 months

During the first six months of follow up, there was no difference between the two treatment arms in number of oral antibiotic treatment days.

NR

up to 581
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,5

These oral antibiotics were given for symptoms and not because of failed eradication.

No numerical data were reported

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: number of positive cultures per patient year

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Adverse effects to antibiotics: severe cough

Follow‐up: up to 24 months

34 per 1000

11 per 1000

(0 to 280 per 1000)

OR 0.32 (95% CI 0.01 to 8.24)

up to 581
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,4

No other specific adverse events were reported.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. In the included trial, 58 participants were randomised but not all participants contributed to all outcomes (unclear how many participants contributed to some outcomes).

2. Downgraded once due to risk of bias; methodological information was limited and unclear in the included study and there were concerns of bias due to selective reporting of results.

3. Downgraded once due to applicability: the included studies recruited only children; results are not applicable to adults.

4. Downgraded once due to imprecision: very wide confidence intervals around the effect size.

5. Downgraded once due to imprecision: no numerical comparative results available.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 3. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin compared to inhaled tobramycin
Summary of findings 4. Inhaled tobramycin (28 days) compared with inhaled tobramycin (56 days)

Inhaled tobramycin (28 days) compared with inhaled tobramycin (56 days) for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: inhaled tobramycin (28 days)

Comparison: inhaled tobramycin (56 days)

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Inhaled tobramycin (56 days)

Inhaled tobramycin (28 days)

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract: time to next isolation of P aeruginosa from BAL, sputum or oropharyngeal cultures

Follow‐up: 27 months

By 26.12 months, 50% of people in the 56 day group can expect to have experienced a recurrence of P aeruginosa.

By 25.18 months, 50% of people in the 28 day group can expect to have experienced a recurrence of P aeruginosa.

HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.37 to 1.76)

651

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

FEV₁: % predicted

Follow‐up: 27 months

There were no major short‐ or long‐term changes in spirometric parameters were observed during the study period.

NR

up to 881
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,4

Changes in lung function were not reported separately for each treatment arm.

FVC: % predicted

Follow‐up: 27 months

There were no major short‐ or long‐term changes in spirometric parameters were observed during the study period.

NR

up to 881
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,4

Changes in lung function were not reported separately for each treatment arm.

Growth and nutritional status: weight, height and BMI

Follow‐up: 27 months

No significant differences in weight, height or body mass index were reported.

NR

up to 881
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,4

Numerical data were not reported or comparative results across the treatment groups.

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: number of exacerbations per patient year

Follow‐up: 27 months

47 per 1000

9 per 1000

(0 to 188 per 1000)

OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.01 to 4.00)

771
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,5

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: number of positive cultures per patient year

Follow‐up: 27 months

There were no consistent trends reported in the isolation of non‐P aeruginosa organisms (one isolate only of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia which was seen in the 28‐day arm).

NR

up to 881
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,4

Numerical data were not reported or comparative results across the treatment groups.

Adverse effects to antibiotics

Follow‐up: up to 27 months

There were no significant differences between treatment groups in terms of any reported adverse events at any time point.

NA

up to 771
(1 RCT)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
very low2,3,6

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
BAL: bronchial lavage CI: confidence interval; FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; HR: hazard ratio; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial.

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. In the included trial, 88 participants were randomised but not all participants contributed to all outcomes (unclear how many participants contributed to some outcomes).

2. Downgraded once due to risk of bias; methodological information was limited and unclear in the included study and there were concerns of bias due to selective reporting of results and lack of blinding.

3. Downgraded once due to applicability: the included studies recruited only children; results are not applicable to adults.

4. Downgraded once due to imprecision: no numerical comparative results available.

5. Downgraded once due to imprecision: very wide confidence intervals around the effect size

6. Downgraded once due to imprecision: some wide confidence intervals around effects sizes (small event rates) and a lot of adverse events analysed increasing the statistical chance of a spurious finding.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 4. Inhaled tobramycin (28 days) compared with inhaled tobramycin (56 days)
Summary of findings 5. Inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin compared to inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin

Inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin compared to inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin

Comparison: inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin

Inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract: proportion with positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa

Follow‐up: median 16 months

315 per 1000

403 per 1000

(227 to 721 per 1000)

OR 1.28 (95% CI 0.72 to 2.29)

up to 2231
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

There was also no significant difference between treatment groups within the first 6 months, OR 1.11 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.92).

FEV₁: relative change in % predicted FEV1 from baseline

Follow‐up: mean 54 days

The mean relative change in % predicted FEV₁ from baseline was 4.55% in the inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin group.

The mean relative change in % predicted FEV₁ from baseline was 2.4% lower (5.89% lower to 1.09% higher) in the inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin group.

NA

1281

(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,4

FVC

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Growth and nutritional status

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: number of exacerbations per patient year

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: number of positive cultures per patient year

Follow‐up: median 16 months

There were no differences during follow up between the two groups for isolation of: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans or Aspergillus species.

NA

2051
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse effects to antibiotics: leading to trial discontinuation

Follow‐up: median 16 months

21 out of 118 (18%) participants discontinued the trial early due to adverse events in the inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin group.

17 out of 105 (16%) participants discontinued the trial early due to adverse events in the inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin group.

NA

223
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Reasons for discontinuations included vomiting, photosensitivity, wheeze and pulmonary exacerbation.

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. In the included trial, 223 participants were randomised but not all participants contributed to all outcomes (unclear how many participants contributed to some outcomes, spirometry not performed in very young children).

2. Downgraded once due to risk of bias; methodological information was limited and unclear in the included study and there were potential concerns of bias due to selective reporting of results and lack of blinding.

3. Downgraded once due to imprecision: wide confidence intervals around the effect size.

4. Downgraded once due to applicability: a large proportion of the randomised participants (95 out of 223, 42%) did not contribute to this outcome.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 5. Inhaled colistin plus oral ciprofloxacin compared to inhaled tobramycin plus oral ciprofloxacin
Summary of findings 6. Cycled inhaled tobramycin compared to culture‐based inhaled tobramycin

Cycled inhaled tobramycin compared to culture‐based inhaled tobramycin for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: cycled inhaled tobramycin

Comparison: culture‐based inhaled tobramycin

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Culture‐based inhaled tobramycin

Cycled inhaled tobramycin

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract: proportion of participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract

Follow‐up: 18 months

467 per 1000

228 per 1000

(145 to 383 per 1000)

OR 0.51 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.82)

2981
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

The original trial report published age group–adjusted ORs which are slightly different to the results of this review.

FEV₁: mean 70‐week % change in FEV₁ (% predicted)

Follow‐up: 70 weeks

The mean 70‐week % change in FEV₁ (% predicted) was ‐1.61% in the culture‐based inhaled tobramycin group.

The mean 70‐week % change in FEV₁ (% predicted) was 2.38% higher (2% lower to 6.76% higher) in the

cycle‐based inhaled tobramycin group.

NA

1431
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

FVC

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Growth and nutritional status: mean 70‐week change from baseline in weight (kg) and height (cm)

Follow‐up: 70 weeks

There were no significant differences between treatment groups in mean 70‐week change from baseline in weight (kg) or height (cm).

NA

3041
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: proportion of participants with one or more pulmonary exacerbations (any severity)

Follow‐up: 18 months

533 per 1000

400 per 1000

(256 to 624 per 1000)

OR 0.75 (95% 0.48 to 1.17)

3041
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

There was also no significant difference between groups in terms of proportion of participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbation or in terms of time to pulmonary exacerbation (severe or any severity).

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: proportion of participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Follow‐up: 18 months

184 per 1000

217 per 1000

(118 to 390 per 1000)

OR 1.18 (95% CI 0.65 to 2.12)

2791
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse effects to antibiotics: proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events

Follow‐up: 18 months

289 per 1000

246 per 1000

(147 to 405 per 1000)

OR 0.85 (95% 0.51 to 1.40)

3041
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. In the included trial, 306 participants were randomised, 304 received treatment but not all participants contributed to all outcomes (unclear how many participants contributed to some outcomes, spirometry not performed in very young children (less than 4 years of age)).

2. Downgraded once due to applicability: the included studies recruited only children; results are not applicable to adults. Also the included trial required patients to have been free of P aeruginosa for at least two years so results may not be applicable to a wider population.

3. Downgraded once due to applicability: a large proportion of the randomised and treated participants (161 out of 304, 53%) did not contribute to this outcome.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 6. Cycled inhaled tobramycin compared to culture‐based inhaled tobramycin
Summary of findings 7. Ciprofloxacin compared to placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy

Ciprofloxacin compared to placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy for eradicating Pseudomonas aeruginosa in people with cystic fibrosis

Patient or population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis and a positive microbiological isolate of P aeruginosa from a respiratory tract specimen

Settings: outpatients

Intervention: ciprofloxacin added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy

Comparison: placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy

Outcomes

Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No of Participants
(studies)

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Assumed risk

Corresponding risk

Placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy

Ciprofloxacin added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy

Eradication of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract: proportion of participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from the respiratory tract

Follow‐up: 18 months

362 per 1000

322 per 1000

(199 to 521 per 1000)

OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.44)

2981
(1 study)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

The original trial report published age group–adjusted ORs which are slightly different to the results of this review.

FEV₁: mean 70‐week % change in FEV₁ (% predicted)

Follow‐up: 70 weeks

The mean 70‐week % change in FEV₁ (% predicted) was ‐1.85% in the placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy group.

The mean 70‐week % change in FEV₁ (% predicted) was 3.02% higher (1.33% lower to 7.37% higher) in the

ciprofloxacin added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy group.

NA

1431
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊝⊝
low2,3

FVC

Follow‐up: NA

Outcome not reported.

NA

NA

NA

Growth and nutritional status: mean 70‐week change from baseline in weight (kg) and height (cm)

Follow‐up: 70 weeks

There were no significant differences between treatment groups in mean 70‐week change from baseline in weight (kg) or height (cm).

NA

3041
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Frequency of infective pulmonary exacerbations: proportion of participants with one or more pulmonary exacerbations (any severity)

Follow‐up: 18 months

447 per 1000

666 per 1000

(425 to 1000)

OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.33)

3041
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

There was also no significant difference between groups in terms of proportion of participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbation or in terms of time to pulmonary exacerbation (severe or any severity).

Isolation of other micro‐organisms from the respiratory tract: proportion of participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

Follow‐up: 18 months

183 per 1000

220 per 1000

(121 to 395 per 1000)

OR 1.20 (95% CI 0.66 to 2.16)

2791
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

Adverse effects to antibiotics: proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse event

Follow‐up: 18 months

230 per 1000

354 per 1000

(214 to 591 per 1000)

OR 1.54 (95% CI 0.93 to 2.57)

3041
(1 RCT)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
moderate2

*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; FEV₁: forced expiratory volume in one second; FVC: forced vital capacity; NA: not applicable; NR: not reported OR: odds ratio; P aeruginosa : Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RCT: randomised controlled trial

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1. In the included trial, 306 participants were randomised, 304 received treatment but not all participants contributed to all outcomes (unclear how many participants contributed to some outcomes, spirometry not performed in very young children (less than 4 years of age)).

2. Downgraded once due to applicability: the included studies recruited only children; results are not applicable to adults. Also the included trial required patients to have been free of P. aeruginosa for at least two years so results may not be applicable to a wider population.

3. Downgraded once due to applicability: a large proportion of the randomised and treated participants (161 out of 304, 53%) did not contribute to this outcome.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 7. Ciprofloxacin compared to placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin therapy
Comparison 1. Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (300 mg 2x daily) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 At 1 month

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 At 2 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (80 mg 2x daily) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 At 1 month

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 At 2 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 At 3 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.4 At 6 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.5 At 12 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined available case analysis) Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 At 1 month

2

38

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.01, 0.33]

3.2 At 2 months

2

38

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.15 [0.03, 0.65]

4 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined) ‐ best case Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 At 1 month

2

39

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [0.01, 0.30]

4.2 At 2 months

2

39

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.03, 0.60]

4.3 At 3 months

1

18

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.02, 1.16]

4.4 At 6 months

1

18

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [0.00, 0.48]

4.5 At 12 months

1

18

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [0.00, 0.26]

5 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa (combined) ‐ worst case Show forest plot

2

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 At 1 month

2

39

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.02, 0.38]

5.2 At 2 months

2

39

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.18 [0.04, 0.73]

5.3 At 3 months

1

18

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.05, 2.77]

5.4 At 6 months

1

18

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.01, 1.83]

5.5 At 12 months

1

18

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.05, 2.77]

6 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6.1 At 1 month

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

6.2 At 2 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

7 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7.1 Cough

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8 Modified Shwachmann score ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8.1 At 1 month

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

8.2 At 2 months

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Inhaled tobramycin versus placebo
Comparison 2. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus no treatment

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Proportion colonised with P aeruginosa Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 At 3 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 At 6 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 At 12 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.4 At 24 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus no treatment
Comparison 3. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus inhaled tobramycin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 In first 6 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 At 24 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Adverse events Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Severe cough

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Oral ciprofloxacin and inhaled colistin versus inhaled tobramycin
Comparison 4. Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Time to next isolation of P aeruginosa from BAL, sputum or oropharyngeal cultures Show forest plot

1

Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Number of respiratory exacerbations Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Until recurrence of P. aeruginosa

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Adverse events (up to 3 months) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Cough

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Productive cough

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Haemoptysis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.4 Rhinitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.5 Sinusitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.6 Nasopharyngitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.7 Tonsilitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.8 Oropharyngeal pain

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.9 Dysphonia

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.10 Headache

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.11 URTI

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.12 Lung disorder

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.13 Bronchitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.14 P. aeruginosa infection

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.15 Influenza

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.16 Otitis media

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.17 Deafness

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.18 Drug level increased

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.19 Pyrexia

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.20 Vomiting

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.21 Varicella

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Adverse events (over 3 months) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Cough

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Productive cough

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Haemoptysis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 Rhinitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 Sinusitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.6 Nasopharyngitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.7 Tonsilitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.8 Oropharyngeal pain

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.9 Dysphonia

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.10 Headache

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.11 URTI

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.12 Lung disorder

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.13 Bronchitis

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.14 P. aeruginosa infection

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.15 Influenza

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.16 Otitis media

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.17 Deafness

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.18 Drug level increased

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.19 Pyrexia

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.20 Vomiting

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.21 Varicella

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Nebulised tobramycin 28 days versus 56 days
Comparison 5. Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Positive respiratory culture for P aeruginosa Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

1.1 In first 6 months

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 At end of follow up (median 16 months)

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 FEV₁ % predicted (relative change from baseline) Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 At mean 54 days

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Microbiology status (post‐trial) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Achromobacter xylosoxidans

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Aspergillus species

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Adverse events leading to trial discontinuation Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Vomiting

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Photosensitivity

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Wheeze

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.4 Pulmonary exacerbation during early eradication treatment

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.5 Lack of compliance

1

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Inhaled colistin/oral ciprofloxacin versus inhaled tobramycin/oral ciprofloxacin
Comparison 6. Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from respiratory tract Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 FEV₁ % predicted ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Mean duration of 70 weeks

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Mean duration of 70 weeks

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Height (cm) ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Mean duration of 70 weeks

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Time to severe pulmonary exacerbation Show forest plot

1

Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbations Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 Time to pulmonary exacerbation (any severity) Show forest plot

1

Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8 Participants with one or more pulmonary exacerbations (any severity) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Participants with one or more serious adverse event Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 6. Cycled inhaled tobramycin versus culture‐based inhaled tobramycin
Comparison 7. Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Participants with one or more isolates of P aeruginosa from respiratory tract Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 FEV₁ % predicted ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2.1 Mean duration of 70 weeks

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Weight (kg) ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3.1 Mean duration of 70 weeks

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Height (cm) ‐ change from baseline Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4.1 Mean duration of 70 weeks

1

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

5 Time to severe pulmonary exacerbation Show forest plot

1

Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Participants with one or more severe pulmonary exacerbations Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 Time to pulmonary exacerbation (any severity) Show forest plot

1

Hazard Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8 Participants with one of more pulmonary exacerbation (any severity) Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

9 Participants with new isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

10 Participants with one or more serious adverse event Show forest plot

1

Odds Ratio (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 7. Ciprofloxacin versus placebo added to cycled and culture‐based inhaled tobramycin