Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 29 August 2023see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Charlotte M Pickett

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA

  • Dachel D Seeratan

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Ben Willem J Mol

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia

  • Theodoor E. Nieboer

    Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands

  • Neil Johnson

    Obstetrics & Gynaecology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

  • Tijmen Bonestroo

    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands

  • Johanna WM Aarts

    Correspondence to: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Charlotte Pickett: extracted data for the current update, assisted with data entry and analysis, and wrote the current update.

Dachel Seeratan: assisted with data extraction and data entry, and wrote the current update.

Tijmen Bonestroo: study selection and data extraction for the current update, assisted with data entry and analysis, wrote the current update.

Theodoor E Nieboer: assisted with data extraction and interpretation, commented on the current update.

Neil Johnson: conceptualised the first review, wrote the protocol and the review, helped supervise the selection of trials and data extraction, and commented on the current update.

Ben Willem Mol: assisted with data extraction and interpretation, commented on the current update.

Johanna WM Aarts: selected trials and extracted data for the current update, performed data entry, wrote and supervised the current update of the review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No internal source of support, Other

    None

External sources

  • No external source of support, Other

    None

Declarations of interest

Charlotte Pickett has no declarations of interest.

Dachel Seeratan has no declarations of interest.

Tijmen Bonestroo has no declarations of interest.

Theodoor E Nieboer has no declarations of interest.

Neil Johnson is a fiduciary officer of World Endometriosis Society and Asia Pacific Initiative in Reproduction (ASPIRE); has received financial remuneration for consultancies from Myovant Sciences and Roche Diagnostics GmbH; and has received research funding from Guerbet and Abbott Pharmaceuticals.

Ben Willem Mol has received financial remuneration for consultancies from Merck, Guerbet LLC and ObcEva.

Johanna WM Aarts has no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank David Barlow, who was involved in the accomplishment of the protocol and the first review, for all his work. We thank Mrs Anne Lethaby, Auckland who commented on the protocol, and assisted with selection of trials, data extraction and data entry in the first review.

We thank the following people for their contributions to previous versions of this review: Jane Clarke, the former Managing Editor of the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group, New Zealand; Sabine van Voorst, the Netherlands; Elisabeth Curr, New Zealand.

The authors of the 2023 update thank Emma Tavender, Ray Garry and Kirsten Kluivers for their contributions to previous versions of this review. We thank the current Managing Editor of Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility, Helen Nagels. We thank Information Specialist Marian Showell for her assistance with the literature search. We thank our peer reviewers Professor Chris Maher and Dr Jack Wilkinson, and external editors. We thank also Jenny Bellorini, Cochrane Central Production Service, who copy edited our draft.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Aug 29

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Review

Charlotte M Pickett, Dachel D Seeratan, Ben Willem J Mol, Theodoor E. Nieboer, Neil Johnson, Tijmen Bonestroo, Johanna WM Aarts

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6

2015 Aug 12

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Review

Johanna WM Aarts, Theodoor E Nieboer, Neil Johnson, Emma Tavender, Ray Garry, Ben Willem J Mol, Kirsten B Kluivers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5

2009 Jul 08

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Review

Theodoor E Nieboer, Neil Johnson, Anne Lethaby, Emma Tavender, Elizabeth Curr, Ray Garry, Sabine van Voorst, Ben Willem J Mol, Kirsten B Kluivers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4

2006 Apr 19

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Review

Theodoor E Nieboer, Neil Johnson, David Barlow, Anne Lethaby, Emma Tavender, Elizabeth Curr, Ray Garry, Sabine van Voorst, Ben Willem J Mol, Kirsten Kluivers

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3

2005 Jan 24

Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Review

Neil Johnson, David Barlow, Anne Lethaby, Emma Tavender, Elizabeth Curr, Ray Garry

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Surgical approaches to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease

Protocol

Neil NP Johnson, Anne Lethaby, Cindy M Farquhar, Ray Garry, David Barlow

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677

Differences between protocol and review

There are now various differences between the protocol (published in 2002) and this version of the review:

  1. New types of hysterectomy have been added. These include single‐port laparoscopic hysterectomy, robot‐assisted hysterectomy and V‐NOTES hysterectomy.

  2. While not included in the original protocol, we have excluded two types of hysterectomy included in the prior published review, as we no longer consider mini‐laparoscopic hysterectomy and mini‐laparotomy different from LH or AH respectively.

  3. Haemoglobin or haematocrit drop and "other intraoperative complication" have been removed from the list of secondary outcomes.

  4. The outcomes in the summary of findings (SOF) tables have been edited for clinical relevance. They now include our primary outcomes and three of our secondary outcomes (vaginal cuff infection, wound/abdominal wall infection and febrile episodes). We no longer report vascular injury, bowel injury, bleeding or unintended laparotomy in the SOF tables.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.