Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Musicoterapia para personas con demencia

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 20 October 2003see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Annemiek C Vink

    Correspondence to: Music Therapy Dept., ArtEZ School of Music, Enschede, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Manon S Bruinsma

    Enschede, Netherlands

  • Rob JPM Scholten

    Dutch Cochrane Centre, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

  • Annemiek Vink contributed to all aspects of the review.

  • Manon Bruinsma assisted with data‐extraction and commenting on the first drafts.

  • Rob Scholten and Jacqueline Birks (first two versions) assisted with data analysis and commenting on drafts, and helped with the assessment of methodological quality.

Consumer editor: Joost de Haas
Contact editor: Leon Flicker

The review has been peer reviewed anonymously

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Netherlands.

  • ArtEZ School of Music, Enschede, Netherlands.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declaraciones de interés

available in

Annemiek Vink es financiado por ZorgOnderzoek Nederland, la Dutch Alzheimer's Society, el Fund Music Therapy BUMA‐STEMRA y el Triodos Fund para la investigación que estudia el efecto de la musicoterapia en la reducción de la agitación en ancianos con demencia.

Agradecimientos

available in

Se agradecen las contribuciones de:

  • El Grupo Cochrane de Demencia y Trastornos Cognitivos (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group). En particular, a los revisores por pares. Se agradece a Dymphna Hermans por su cordial ayuda con las búsquedas de la literatura y otras cuestiones y por brindar valiosos comentarios.

  • Ingrid Riphagen, la bibliotecaria clínica de la Universidad de Groningen por su gentil colaboración.

  • Prof. Dr. Joris Slaets (Universidad de Groningen, Países Bajos) por su asesoramiento clínico metodológico y geriátrico.

  • Los estudiantes de musicoterapia del Conservatorio Enschede, Saxion Hogeschool, Países Bajos por su ayuda para recuperar los estudios posibles.

  • Nuestro revisor no especializado Sr. Joost de Haas.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Jul 23

Music‐based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia

Review

Jenny T van der Steen, Hanneke JA Smaling, Johannes C van der Wouden, Manon S Bruinsma, Rob JPM Scholten, Annemiek C Vink

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub4

2017 May 02

Music‐based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia

Review

Jenny T van der Steen, Mirjam C van Soest‐Poortvliet, Johannes C van der Wouden, Manon S Bruinsma, Rob JPM Scholten, Annemiek C Vink

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub3

2003 Oct 20

Music therapy for people with dementia

Review

Annemiek C Vink, Manon S Bruinsma, Rob JPM Scholten

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub2

2002 Jan 21

Music therapy in the care of people with dementia

Protocol

Annemiek C Vink, M S Bruinsma, Rob Scholten

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003477

Differences between protocol and review

In the previous versions the Delphi List was used to assess risk of bias. In this review recommended Risk of Bias tables were completed for all included studies.

Notes

May 2004: This is a completely new review of music therapy for people with dementia written by a new and different team of reviewers (Vink et al) from the previous, now permanently withdrawn review of music therapy (Koger et al).

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.