Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhibidores de la aromatasa para el tratamiento del cáncer de mama avanzado en mujeres posmenopáusicas

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003370.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 07 October 2009see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Breast Cancer Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Lorna Gibson

    London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

  • David Lawrence

    Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK

  • Claire Dawson

    Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK

  • Judith Bliss

    Correspondence to: Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

Judith Bliss wrote the original protocol, initiated the review with Lorna Gibson and reviewed the review.

Lorna Gibson worked with the Cochrane Breast Group to identify the initial list of references; she then worked through the list to identify eligible trials. Lorna carried out the first independent data extraction from the eligible trials and was a main contributor to the review and analysis, and the update.

Claire Dawson carried out a second independent extraction of data from the eligible trials and contributed to the original review.

David Lawrence carried out an independent check of the data extraction for accuracy and consistency and was a main contributor to the original review analysis, and the update.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Cancer Research UK, UK

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

One of the authors (JMB) is a member of the management group and grant holder for the Intergroup Exemestane Study. This is funded by Pfizer, the producers of the aromatase inhibitor exemestane.

Acknowledgements

The authors were funded by Cancer Research UK. Lorna Gibson would like to thank Julian Peto and Isabel dos Santos Silva for their support. The authors would like to thank the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group for their support and are indebted to Olivia Fletcher for critical reading of the manuscript.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2009 Oct 07

Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Review

Lorna Gibson, David Lawrence, Claire Dawson, Judith Bliss

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003370.pub3

2009 Jul 08

Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women

Review

Lorna Gibson, Claire Dawson, David Lawrence, Judith Bliss

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003370.pub2

2001 Oct 23

Aromatase Inhibitors for treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Protocol

Judith Bliss, Lorna Gibson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003370

Differences between protocol and review

Many of the data required to carry out analyses of prospectively identified subgroups, as set out in the review protocol, were not available. We could not, therefore, identify specific subgroups of women who may benefit from AI use.

Notes

This updated review includes the following additional seven trials to the 30 in the original publication: Chia 2008; Gale 1994; Garcia‐Giralt 1992; Goss 2007; Lundgren 1989; Samonis 1994. There were also two papers by Mourisden and colleagues (Mourisden 2004; Mourisden 2007) which contributed follow‐up information.

The update demonstrated a survival benefit of 10% with the use of AIs for the treatment of advanced (metastatic) breast cancer, compared to 11% in the original review.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.