Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for rosacea

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 20 October 2003see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Skin Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2005 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Esther J van Zuuren

    Correspondence to: Medicines Evaluation Board, Kalvermarkt 53, 2500 BE The Hague, the Netherlands, Den Haag, Netherlands

    [email protected]

  • Mark A Graber

    Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Other

  • Sally Hollis

    Medical Statistics Unit, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

  • Maria MMC Chaudhry

    Mediprobe Laboratories, London, Canada

  • Aditya K Gupta

    London, Canada

Contributions of authors

van Zuuren EJ, Lead reviewer:
Drafted the protocol
Searched for trials
Wrote to authors for additional information
Obtained copies of trials
Obtained and screened data on unpublished studies
Quality assessment and selected which trials to include
Extracted data from trials
Entered data into Revman
Interpreted the analysis
Drafted the final review
Will update the review
Guarantor of the review

Graber, Mark
Searched for trials
Drafted the protocol
Quality assessment and selected which trials to include
Extracted data from trials
Drafted the review

Hollis, Sally
Advised on data extraction
Advised on data entry
Interpreted analysis
Critical revision of the review
Drafted the review

Gupta, Aditya
Searched for trials (Medline)
Entered part of data in Revman

Chaudhry, Maria
Entered part of data in Revman

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Medicines Evaluation Board, Netherlands.

  • Lancaster University, UK.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

None known

Acknowledgements

The editorial base would like to thank the following people who were the external referees for this review: Joel Bamford (content expert), Alfredo Rebora (content expert), Matthew Grainge (statistician), Carol Coupland (statistician), Alison Dudley (consumer) and Maria Cunningham (consumer).

The reviewers would like to thank Mrs DL Brand‐de Heer (librarian) for her help with the search for trials, Frank Powell (content expert) for his useful advice, Mary Finn (consumer) for her help and suggestions and Rob Scholtens (statistician) for his enthusiastic support during the analysis. Furthermore the reviewers would like to thank Tina Leonard (Review Group Co‐ordinator for the Skin Group) for being always there, offering help and giving pep talks when needed, and Dedee Murrell, our lead editor, for her hard work. And last, but not least I would like to thank Hywel Williams for his wise advice and for helping me to keep the torch burning in difficult moments.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2015 Apr 28

Interventions for rosacea

Review

Esther J van Zuuren, Zbys Fedorowicz, Ben Carter, Mireille MD van der Linden, Lyn Charland

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub5

2011 Mar 16

Interventions for rosacea

Review

Esther J van Zuuren, Sharon Kramer, Ben Carter, Mark A Graber, Zbys Fedorowicz

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub4

2005 Jul 20

Interventions for rosacea

Review

Esther J van Zuuren, Mark A Graber, Sally Hollis, Maria MMC Chaudhry, Aditya K Gupta, Melissa D Gover

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub3

2003 Oct 20

Interventions for rosacea

Review

Esther J van Zuuren, Mark A Graber, Sally Hollis, Maria MMC Chaudhry, Aditya K Gupta

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub2

2000 Dec 07

Interventions for acne rosacea

Protocol

Esther EJ van Zuuren, Frank C Powell, Mark A Graber

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003262

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.