Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation
Information
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4Copy DOI
- Database:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Version published:
-
- 27 July 2023see what's new
- Type:
-
- Intervention
- Stage:
-
- Review
- Cochrane Editorial Group:
-
Cochrane Neonatal Group
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article metrics
Altmetric:
Cited by:
Authors
Contributions of authors
PGD and BL prepared the original protocol for this review.
AGD and HK provided additional material for the background section.
BL, MOD and PB updated the literature search.
MOD and PB made independent quality assessments and extracted data before comparing results and resolving differences with BL for this update.
All review authors participated in data analysis and interpretation of results for this updated review.
MOD and BL revised the manuscript as required until adequate for publication.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Salary support
-
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
Salary support
-
University of Melbourne, Australia
Salary support
-
Royal Hobart Hospital, Australia
Salary support
-
University of Tasmania, Australia
Salary support
-
CHEO Research Institute, Canada
Summer research studentship for P Benson 2021
External sources
-
Vermont Oxford Network, USA
Cochrane Neonatal Reviews are produced with support from Vermont Oxford Network, a worldwide collaboration of health professionals dedicated to providing evidence‐based care of the highest quality for newborn infants and their families.
-
National Institute for Health Research, UK
Editorial support for Cochrane Neonatal has been funded with funds from a UK National Institute of Health Research Grant (NIHR) Cochrane Programme Grant (13/89/12). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR or the UK Department of Health.
Declarations of interest
BL was an author of an included study (Kirpalani 2013). The Canadian Institutes of Health Research funded the study. She requested data from the study for inclusion in the review (data extracted by the trial statistician, R Roberts). Roger Soll, co‐ordinating editor, Cochrane Neonatal assessed risk of bias and undertook GRADE assessment for this data. R Soll does not have any interests to disclose at this time.
PB: none.
MOD: none.
HK was involved in conducting a randomised controlled trial comparing NIPPV to NCPAP, (Nasal Ventilation in Preterm Infants (NIP) trial) published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2013 (Kirpalani 2013). The funding source for this study was the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
AGP: none.
PD received a grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. He was involved in conducting the COIN trial (a multicentre trial conducted at his institution, The Royal Women's Hospital) by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. This trial is not included in this review.
Acknowledgements
The review authors acknowledge the generosity of Drs Friedlich, Barrington and Bhandari, who supplied 'preprints' of their manuscripts and additional information for this review. The review authors also acknowledge the generosity of the steering committee of Kirpalani 2013, which provided further data for analysis.
The methods section of this review is based on a standard template used by Cochrane Neonatal.
We would like to thank Cochrane Neonatal: Jane Cracknell and Michelle Fiander, Managing Editors; and Roger Soll and Bill McGuire, Co‐coordinating Editors, who provided editorial and administrative support.
We thank Michelle Fiander as Information Specialist, for her assistance in designing and running the search strategies; writing the search methods and associated components.
We thank peer reviewer Jucille Meneses MD, PhD, Professor of Pediatrics, Director of Neonatology, Instituto de Medicina integral Prof Fernando Figueira, Brazil, for editorial comments.
We also thank Anne Lawson, Central Production Service, Cochrane for copy edit support.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2023 Jul 27 | Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation | Review | Brigitte Lemyre, Marc-Olivier Deguise, Paige Benson, Haresh Kirpalani, Antonio G De Paoli, Peter G Davis | |
| 2017 Feb 01 | Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation | Review | Brigitte Lemyre, Peter G Davis, Antonio G De Paoli, Haresh Kirpalani | |
| 2014 Sep 04 | Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation | Review | Brigitte Lemyre, Peter G Davis, Antonio G De Paoli, Haresh Kirpalani | |
| 2001 Jul 23 | Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation | Review | Peter G Davis, Brigitte Lemyre, Antonio G De Paoli | |
Differences between protocol and review
We made the following changes to the initial protocol and published review (Davis 2001).
-
Added a summary of findings table.
-
Used GRADE recommendations.
-
Updated the methods to reflect the recent protocol updates from Cochrane (Cracknell 2023).
-
Adopted a method to derive mean and SD for continuous outcomes when only median and interquartile ranges were available.
-
Added a post hoc subgroup analysis of the economic setting of the countries from which the trials originated. We used the World Bank country classification for this subgroup analysis.
