Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Colocación de espirales endovasculares versus clips neuroquirúrgicos para pacientes con hemorragia subaracnoidea por aneurisma

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 15 August 2018

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 19 October 2005see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Stroke Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Irene van der Schaaf

    Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Ale Algra

    Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Marieke Wermer

    Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Andrew Molyneux

    Neurovascular Research Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK

  • Mike J Clarke

    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK

  • Jan van Gijn

    Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Gabriel JE Rinkel

    Correspondence to: Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

IC van der Schaaf: extracted data from the studies included in the review; prepared the analysis and has written the first drafts of the review.
A Algra: participated in writing the grant application; developing the protocol; appraising the quality of studies; data analysis; data interpretation and writing the review.
MJH Wermer: extracted data from the studies included in the review and participated in writing the review.
A Molyneux: gave comments on the protocol and participated in data interpretation and writing the review.
M Clarke: helped editing the text of the review and has written the synopsis.
J van Gijn: participated in writing the grant application; developing the protocol; appraising the quality of studies; data interpretation and writing the review.
GJE Rinkel: participated in developing the protocol; data extraction; appraising the quality of studies; data analysis; data interpretation; writing the review and entering the review into RevMan. Dr Rinkel is the guarantor for this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • NHS Research and Development Programme, UK Cochrane Centre, UK.

External sources

  • Netherlands Heartfoundation, Netherlands.

Declaraciones de interés

available in

El Dr. A Molyneux actúa como asesor médico de Micrus Corporation, una empresa que elabora espirales desmontables. También tiene interés sobre las acciones de esta empresa. El Dr. M Clarke está en el Comité Ejecutivo para el ensayo de ISAT.

Agradecimientos

available in

Se agradece a los doctores EH Brilstra y WJJ van Rooij sus contribuciones para desarrollar el protocolo para esta revisión.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Aug 15

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Review

Antti Lindgren, Mervyn DI Vergouwen, Irene van der Schaaf, Ale Algra, Marieke Wermer, Mike J Clarke, Gabriel JE Rinkel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Review

Irene van der Schaaf, Ale Algra, Marieke Wermer, Andrew Molyneux, Mike J Clarke, Jan van Gijn, Gabriel JE Rinkel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub2

2001 Jan 22

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Protocol

Ale Algra, Eva Brilstra, Mike Clarke, Jan van Gijn, Andrew Molyneux, Gabriel JE Rinkel, WJJ van Rooij

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.