Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Related content

Jump to:

Related reviews and protocols

Topics

Topics

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 1 Pregnancy.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 1 Pregnancy.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancies.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancies.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 3 Spontaneous abortions.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 3 Spontaneous abortions.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 4 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation, Outcome 4 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 1 Pregnancy.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 1 Pregnancy.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancies.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 2 Multiple pregnancies.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 3 Spontaneous abortions.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 3 Spontaneous abortions.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 4 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation, Outcome 4 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.

Navigate to figure in ReviewOpen in new tab
Table 1. Number of pregnancies per total number of cycles.

Study

Intrauterine Insemin

Timed Intercourse

Check 1995

17/80

3/76

Glazener 1987

2/223

3/252

Kirby 1991

7/58

4/52

Martinez 1990

1/3

0/4
Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Number of pregnancies per total number of cycles.
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 1. Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pregnancy Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Multiple pregnancies Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Spontaneous abortions Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Intra uterine insemination without ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse without ovarian stimulation
Navigate to table in Review
Comparison 2. Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Pregnancy Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2 Multiple pregnancies Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3 Spontaneous abortions Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

3.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4 Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome Show forest plot

5

20

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.1 All trials

5

10

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.2 Only randomized controlled trials

3

6

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

4.3 Quasi randomized controlled trials

2

4

Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Intra uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation versus timed intercourse with ovarian stimulation
Navigate to table in Review