Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tratamiento de mantenimiento con metadona versus ninguna terapia de reemplazo con opiáceos para la dependencia de los opiáceos

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002209.pub2Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 08 July 2009see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Richard P Mattick

    Correspondence to: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Courtney Breen

    National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

  • Jo Kimber

    Centre for Research on Drugs and Health Behaviour, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

  • Marina Davoli

    Department of Epidemiology, ASL RM/E, Rome, Italy

Contributions of authors

Contributions: Richard P Mattick, Jo Klimber and Courtney Breen reviewed the papers, with Courtney Breen and Richard P. Mattick coding data from the papers for meta‐analysis.

Richard P. Mattick conceptualised the review and Courtney Breen conducted the initial literature searches.

Richard P. Mattick wrote the analysis sections and discussion. Marina Davoli was the contact editor of the review and contributed to the writing of the final version of the review.

The review was updated by Richard P. Mattick and Courtney Breen.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

External sources

  • Commonwealth Department of Health and Aged Care, Canberra, Australia.

Declarations of interest

The first reviewer, Richard P. Mattick, is the fourth author on the Australian trial of methadone maintenance versus wait‐list control in a prison setting (Dolan 2003).

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the assistance of the Cochrane Review Group Coordinating Centre, Rome.

Laura Amato from the Rome Editorial Base provided copyediting on the drafts of this review.

Marica Ferri from the Rome Editorial Base provided comments and copyediting on the drafts of the previous version of the review as well as Roberto D'Amico from the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group provided advice on statistical analysis issues.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2009 Jul 08

Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence

Review

Richard P Mattick, Courtney Breen, Jo Kimber, Marina Davoli

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002209.pub2

2003 Apr 22

Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence

Review

Richard P. Mattick, Courtney Breen, Jo Kimber, Marina Davoli, Rosie Breen

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002209

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.