Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Methodological quality graph: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Comparison 1 Systematic desensitisation versus waiting list, Outcome 1 Successful intercourse.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Systematic desensitisation versus waiting list, Outcome 1 Successful intercourse.

Comparison 1 Systematic desensitisation versus waiting list, Outcome 2 Drop‐outs.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Systematic desensitisation versus waiting list, Outcome 2 Drop‐outs.

Comparison 2 Systematic desensitisation versus systematic desensitisation + group therapy, Outcome 1 Successful intercourse.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Systematic desensitisation versus systematic desensitisation + group therapy, Outcome 1 Successful intercourse.

Comparison 2 Systematic desensitisation versus systematic desensitisation + group therapy, Outcome 2 Drop‐outs.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Systematic desensitisation versus systematic desensitisation + group therapy, Outcome 2 Drop‐outs.

Comparison 3 Systematic desensitisation versus in vitro desensitisation, Outcome 1 Successful intercourse.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Systematic desensitisation versus in vitro desensitisation, Outcome 1 Successful intercourse.

Comparison 4 Systematic desensitisation versus pelvic floor exercises, Outcome 1 Drop‐outs.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Systematic desensitisation versus pelvic floor exercises, Outcome 1 Drop‐outs.

Comparison 5 Systematic desensitisation versus hypnotherapy, Outcome 1 Drop‐outs.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Systematic desensitisation versus hypnotherapy, Outcome 1 Drop‐outs.

Comparison 1. Systematic desensitisation versus waiting list

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Successful intercourse Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Drop‐outs Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Systematic desensitisation versus waiting list
Comparison 2. Systematic desensitisation versus systematic desensitisation + group therapy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Successful intercourse Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Drop‐outs Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.32 [0.71, 2.46]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Systematic desensitisation versus systematic desensitisation + group therapy
Comparison 3. Systematic desensitisation versus in vitro desensitisation

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Successful intercourse Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Systematic desensitisation versus in vitro desensitisation
Comparison 4. Systematic desensitisation versus pelvic floor exercises

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Drop‐outs Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Systematic desensitisation versus pelvic floor exercises
Comparison 5. Systematic desensitisation versus hypnotherapy

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Drop‐outs Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Systematic desensitisation versus hypnotherapy