Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychosocial and psychological interventions for preventing postpartum depression

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001134.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 28 February 2013see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Cindy‐Lee Dennis

    Correspondence to: University of Toronto and Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Canada

    [email protected]

  • Therese Dowswell

    Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Contributions of authors

Dr Dennis independently evaluated the trials for quality, extracted and entered data, completed the meta‐analysis, and wrote the text of the review and the conclusion. T Dowswell contributed to data extraction in this update, and commented on data analysis and drafts of the text.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Toronto, Canada.

External sources

  • NIHR, UK.

    TD is supported by the NIHR NHS Cochrane Collaboration Programme grant scheme award for NHS‐prioritised centrally‐managed, pregnancy and childbirth systematic reviews: CPGS 10/4001/02

Declarations of interest

Dr Dennis is a principal investigator for a multi‐site trial included in this review that evaluated the effect of telephone‐based peer (mother‐to‐mother) support in the prevention of postpartum depression among mothers identified as high‐risk (Dennis 2009).

Acknowledgements

The review authors gratefully acknowledge Dr Debra Creedy who assisted Dr Dennis with the first version of this review in 2004. The review authors also wish to thank: (1) Julie Weston for her data extraction, independent evaluation of trial quality, contacting trial authors as necessary, and data entry; (2) Danni Li for translating Sun 2004; Tang 2009; Xu 2003. Edward Plaisance Jr for translating Ajh 2006. Alison Balmfirth, Laura Wills, Ed Doragh and Nivene Raafat for translating Bittner 2009. Aoife Fogarty for translating Kleeb 2005. Francesca Gatenby, Nick Jones, Juliet Sheath for translating Urech 2009; and (3) the many study authors who were very helpful in responding to queries and providing additional data.

As part of the pre‐publication editorial process, this review has been commented on by four peers (an editor and three referees who are external to the editorial team), a member of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's international panel of consumers and the Group's Statistical Adviser.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Feb 28

Psychosocial and psychological interventions for preventing postpartum depression

Review

Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Therese Dowswell

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001134.pub3

2004 Oct 18

Psychosocial and psychological interventions for preventing postpartum depression

Review

Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Debra K Creedy

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001134.pub2

2001 Oct 23

Psychosocial interventions for preventing postpartum depression

Protocol

Cindy‐Lee E Dennis, Josephine Kavanagh

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001134

Differences between protocol and review

The title of the previously published protocol was 'Psychosocial interventions for preventing postpartum depression'.

Keywords

MeSH

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 All interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, outcome: 1.1 Depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 All interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, outcome: 1.1 Depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 All interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, outcome: 1.2 Mean depression scores at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 All interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, outcome: 1.2 Mean depression scores at final study assessment.

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, outcome: 2.4 All psychosocial interventions: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, outcome: 2.4 All psychosocial interventions: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, outcome: 2.5 All psychosocial interventions: mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, outcome: 2.5 All psychosocial interventions: mean depression scores.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 1 Depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 1 Depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 2 Mean depression scores at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 2 Mean depression scores at final study assessment.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 3 Diagnosis of depression at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 3 Diagnosis of depression at final study assessment.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 4 Depressive symptomatology at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 4 Depressive symptomatology at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 5 Mean depression scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 5 Mean depression scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 6 Diagnosis of depression at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 6 Diagnosis of depression at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 7 Maternal mortality at > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 7 Maternal mortality at > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 8 Maternal‐infant attachment at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 8 Maternal‐infant attachment at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 9 Mean maternal‐infant attachment scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 9 Mean maternal‐infant attachment scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 10 Anxiety at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 10 Anxiety at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 11 Mean anxiety scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 11 Mean anxiety scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 12 Maternal stress at 16 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 12 Maternal stress at 16 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 13 Mean maternal stress scores at 24 and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 13 Mean maternal stress scores at 24 and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 14 Mean parental stress scores at 8, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 14 Mean parental stress scores at 8, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 15 Perceived social support at 8 and 16 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.15

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 15 Perceived social support at 8 and 16 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 16 Mean perceived social support scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.16

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 16 Mean perceived social support scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 17 Maternal dissatisfaction with care provided at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.17

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 17 Maternal dissatisfaction with care provided at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 18 Mean maternal dissatisfaction scores at 8 and 16 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.18

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 18 Mean maternal dissatisfaction scores at 8 and 16 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 19 Infant health parameters ‐ not fully immunized at > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.19

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 19 Infant health parameters ‐ not fully immunized at > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 20 Infant development > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.20

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 20 Infant development > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 21 Child abuse at 8 and > 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.21

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 21 Child abuse at 8 and > 24 weeks.

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 22 Mean marital discord scores at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.22

Comparison 1 All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes, Outcome 22 Mean marital discord scores at 8, 16, and 24 weeks.

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 1 All psychosocial interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 1 All psychosocial interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 2 All psychosocial interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 2 All psychosocial interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 3 All psychosocial interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 3 All psychosocial interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 4 All psychosocial interventions: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 4 All psychosocial interventions: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 5 All psychosocial interventions: mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 5 All psychosocial interventions: mean depression scores.

Comparison 3 All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 1 All psychological interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 1 All psychological interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 3 All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 2 All psychological interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 2 All psychological interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 3 All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 3 All psychological interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.3

Comparison 3 All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type, Outcome 3 All psychological interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 4 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychosocial interventions, Outcome 1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychosocial interventions, Outcome 1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Comparison 4 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychosocial interventions, Outcome 2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychosocial interventions, Outcome 2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment.

Comparison 5 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychological interventions, Outcome 1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychological interventions, Outcome 1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Comparison 5 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychological interventions, Outcome 2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.2

Comparison 5 Subgroup analysis: variations in psychological interventions, Outcome 2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 1 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.1

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 1 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 2 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.2

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 2 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 3 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.3

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 3 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 4 Lay‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.4

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 4 Lay‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 5 Lay‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.5

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 5 Lay‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 6 Lay‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.6

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 6 Lay‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.7

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 8 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.8

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 8 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 6.9

Comparison 6 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider, Outcome 9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment.

Comparison 7 Subgroup analysis: variations in professionally‐based intervention provider, Outcome 1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.1

Comparison 7 Subgroup analysis: variations in professionally‐based intervention provider, Outcome 1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment.

Comparison 7 Subgroup analysis: variations in professionally‐based intervention provider, Outcome 2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 7.2

Comparison 7 Subgroup analysis: variations in professionally‐based intervention provider, Outcome 2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 1 Individually‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.1

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 1 Individually‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 2 Individually‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.2

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 2 Individually‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 3 Individually‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.3

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 3 Individually‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 4 Group‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.4

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 4 Group‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 5 Group‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.5

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 5 Group‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 6 Group‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.6

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 6 Group‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.7

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 8 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.8

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 8 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 8.9

Comparison 8 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode, Outcome 9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 1 Single‐contact interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.1

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 1 Single‐contact interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 2 Single‐contact interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.2

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 2 Single‐contact interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 3 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.3

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 3 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 4 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.4

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 4 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 5 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.5

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 5 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 6 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.6

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 6 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 9.7

Comparison 9 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 1 Interventions with antenatal only component ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.1

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 1 Interventions with antenatal only component ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 2 Interventions with antenatal only component ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.2

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 2 Interventions with antenatal only component ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 3 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.3

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 3 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 4 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.4

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 4 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 5 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.5

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 5 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 6 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.6

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 6 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 7 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.7

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 7 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 8 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.8

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 8 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.9

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 10 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.10

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 10 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 11 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 10.11

Comparison 10 Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset, Outcome 11 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 1 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.1

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 1 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 2 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.2

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 2 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 3 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ diagnosis of depression.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.3

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 3 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ diagnosis of depression.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 4 Interventions for general population ‐ depressive symptomatology.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.4

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 4 Interventions for general population ‐ depressive symptomatology.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 5 Interventions for general population ‐ mean depression scores.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.5

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 5 Interventions for general population ‐ mean depression scores.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 6 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.6

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 6 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment.

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 11.7

Comparison 11 Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria, Outcome 7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment.

Comparison 1. All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Depressive symptomatology at final study assessment Show forest plot

20

14727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

2 Mean depression scores at final study assessment Show forest plot

19

12376

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.28, 0.01]

3 Diagnosis of depression at final study assessment Show forest plot

5

939

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.32, 0.78]

4 Depressive symptomatology at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

20

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

13

4907

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.56, 0.95]

4.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

10

3982

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.56, 0.97]

4.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

9

10636

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.82, 1.05]

4.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

5

2936

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.54, 0.82]

5 Mean depression scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

19

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Immediate outcomes: 0‐8 weeks

6

1234

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.41, 0.09]

5.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

9

3628

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.72, 0.20]

5.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

10

9944

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.03, 0.05]

5.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

7

2447

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.58, 0.25]

6 Diagnosis of depression at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

6.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks postpartum

4

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.31, 0.77]

6.3 Intermediate outcome: 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

7 Maternal mortality at > 24 weeks Show forest plot

1

234

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.97 [0.06, 15.27]

8 Maternal‐infant attachment at 8, 16, and 24 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

133

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.64, 1.59]

8.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

126

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.29 [0.78, 2.13]

8.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

127

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.59, 1.34]

9 Mean maternal‐infant attachment scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

176

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.40, 0.19]

9.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

160

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.51, 0.11]

9.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

152

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.54, 0.10]

9.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

1

116

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.49, 0.24]

9.5 At final study assessment

2

268

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.42, 0.06]

10 Anxiety at 8, 16, and 24 weeks Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

10.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

245

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.05, 2.34]

10.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

3

843

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.41 [0.12, 1.41]

10.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

130

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.25, 3.60]

10.4 At final study assessment

4

959

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.14, 1.14]

11 Mean anxiety scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

11.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

163

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.09 [‐0.39, 0.22]

11.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

2

740

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.30, ‐0.01]

11.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

2

160

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.55, 0.07]

11.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

1

43

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.77, 0.43]

11.5 At final study assessment

4

815

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.30, ‐0.03]

12 Maternal stress at 16 weeks Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

12.1 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

103

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.20, 0.96]

13 Mean maternal stress scores at 24 and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

13.1 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

787

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐1.02, 1.02]

13.2 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

1

840

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.5 [‐0.51, 1.51]

14 Mean parental stress scores at 8, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

14.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

176

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.37, 0.22]

14.2 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

124

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.62, 0.09]

14.3 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

2

341

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.27 [0.05, 0.48]

14.4 At final study assessment

3

465

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.25, 0.48]

15 Perceived social support at 8 and 16 weeks Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

15.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

528

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.45, 1.05]

15.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

190

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.02 [0.34, 3.05]

15.3 At final study assessment

2

718

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.48, 1.08]

16 Mean perceived social support scores at 8, 16, 24, and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

16.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

3

822

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.13, 0.17]

16.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

2

863

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.16 [‐0.21, 0.53]

16.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

6

8122

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.06, 0.12]

16.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

2

955

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.07 [‐0.20, 0.06]

16.5 At final study assessment

7

8290

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.08, 0.10]

17 Maternal dissatisfaction with care provided at 8, 16, and 24 weeks Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

17.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

825

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.29, 1.09]

17.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

1278

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.65, 1.19]

17.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

911

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.44, 1.25]

17.4 At final study assessment

4

3014

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.44, 1.00]

18 Mean maternal dissatisfaction scores at 8 and 16 weeks Show forest plot

2

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

18.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

516

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.0 [‐0.17, 0.17]

18.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

160

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.58, 1.23]

18.3 At final study assessment

2

676

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.44 [‐0.44, 1.32]

19 Infant health parameters ‐ not fully immunized at > 24 weeks Show forest plot

1

884

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.16 [0.39, 3.43]

20 Infant development > 24 weeks Show forest plot

1

280

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐2.90, 1.10]

20.1 Bayley (BSID‐II)

1

280

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.90 [‐2.90, 1.10]

21 Child abuse at 8 and > 24 weeks Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

21.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

176

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐35.66 [‐62.65, ‐8.67]

21.2 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

1

66

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐41.90 [‐87.48, 3.68]

22 Mean marital discord scores at 8, 16, and 24 weeks Show forest plot

3

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

22.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

163

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.34, 0.28]

22.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

1

127

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.63, 0.07]

22.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

3

291

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.37, 0.09]

22.4 At final study assessment

3

291

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.37, 0.09]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. All psychosocial and psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ various study outcomes
Comparison 2. All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All psychosocial interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate outcome ‐ 0‐8 weeks

6

2138

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.52, 1.14]

1.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

8

3705

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.80 [0.61, 1.06]

1.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

6

8116

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.78, 1.00]

1.4 Long‐term outcomes >24 weeks

3

1385

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.46, 0.76]

1.5 At final study assessment

12

11322

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.70, 0.99]

2 All psychosocial interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

12

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

3

849

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.12 [‐0.47, 0.23]

2.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

6

3333

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.32 [‐0.90, 0.25]

2.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

8

8998

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.00 [‐0.04, 0.05]

2.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

5

2254

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.26 [‐0.76, 0.24]

2.5 At final study assessment

12

10944

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.33, 0.04]

3 All psychosocial interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

3

867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.33, 0.83]

4 All psychosocial interventions: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment Show forest plot

12

11322

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.70, 0.99]

5 All psychosocial interventions: mean depression scores Show forest plot

12

10944

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.33, 0.04]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. All psychosocial interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type
Comparison 3. All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 All psychological interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

7

2760

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.47, 1.02]

1.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

2

277

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.18, 0.89]

1.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

3

2520

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.04 [0.83, 1.30]

1.4 Long‐term outcomes >24 weeks

2

1551

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.86 [0.58, 1.28]

1.5 At final study assessment

8

3405

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.39, 0.96]

2 All psychological interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 immediate outcome 0‐8 weeks

3

385

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.20 [‐0.63, 0.22]

2.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

3

295

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.27, 0.21]

2.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

2

946

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.08 [‐0.05, 0.20]

2.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

2

193

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.17, 0.39]

2.5 At final study assessment

7

1432

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.32, 0.13]

3 All psychological interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Diagnosis of depression ‐ 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

3.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.00, 1.34]

3.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

3.4 At final study assessment

2

72

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.31 [0.04, 2.52]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. All psychological interventions versus usual care ‐ variations in intervention type
Comparison 4. Subgroup analysis: variations in psychosocial interventions

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment Show forest plot

12

11322

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.70, 0.99]

1.1 Antenatal and postnatal classes

4

1488

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.77, 1.32]

1.2 Postpartum professional‐based home visits

2

1262

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.43, 0.73]

1.3 Postpartum lay‐based home visits

1

493

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.62, 1.25]

1.4 Postpartum lay‐based telephone support

1

612

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.54 [0.38, 0.77]

1.5 Early postpartum follow‐up

1

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.55, 1.49]

1.6 Continuity model of care

3

7021

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.71, 1.36]

2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment Show forest plot

4

1411

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.12, 0.10]

2.1 Antenatal and postnatal classes

3

1124

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.11, 0.13]

2.2 Antenatal and postnatal lay‐based home visits and telephone support

1

287

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.33, 0.14]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Subgroup analysis: variations in psychosocial interventions
Comparison 5. Subgroup analysis: variations in psychological interventions

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment Show forest plot

6

3200

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.35, 1.01]

1.1 Psychological debriefing

5

3050

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.31, 1.03]

1.2 Cognitive behavioural therapy

1

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.29, 1.88]

2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment Show forest plot

6

516

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.43, 0.11]

2.1 Interpersonal psychotherapy

5

366

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.27 [‐0.52, ‐0.01]

2.2 Cognitive behavioural therapy

1

150

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.13 [‐0.20, 0.45]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Subgroup analysis: variations in psychological interventions
Comparison 6. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

10

3699

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.45, 0.93]

1.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

8

3196

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.79 [0.57, 1.09]

1.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

7

3929

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.87, 1.23]

1.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

4

2786

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.51, 0.90]

2 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

12

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Immediate outcomes: 0‐8 weeks

4

512

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.34 [‐0.56, ‐0.12]

2.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

6

2807

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.31 [‐0.95, 0.34]

2.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

7

3161

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.02 [‐0.05, 0.09]

2.4 Long‐term outcome >24 weeks

5

2010

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.79, 0.31]

3 Professionally‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

3.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks postpartum

1

190

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.13, 1.98]

3.3 Intermediate outcome: 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

4 Lay‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

3

1208

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.70, 1.18]

4.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

2

786

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.55 [0.40, 0.75]

4.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

1

493

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.62, 1.25]

4.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

1

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.29, 1.88]

5 Lay‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

5

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Immediate outcomes: 0‐8 weeks

2

722

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.11 [‐0.04, 0.25]

5.2 Short‐term outcome 9‐16 weeks

2

786

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.35, 0.19]

5.3 Intermediate outcome 17‐24 weeks

2

633

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.06 [‐0.22, 0.09]

5.4 Long‐term outcome > 24 weeks

2

437

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.01 [‐0.22, 0.20]

6 Lay‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks postpartum

2

677

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.32, 0.86]

7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment Show forest plot

19

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Professionally‐based interventions

15

6790

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.60, 1.00]

7.2 Lay‐based interventions

4

1723

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.54, 0.90]

8 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment Show forest plot

17

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Professionally‐based interventions

12

4509

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.40, 0.10]

8.2 Lay‐based interventions

5

1682

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐0.20, 0.01]

9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

9.1 Professionally‐based interventions

2

227

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.22, 1.47]

9.2 Lay‐based interventions

2

677

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.32, 0.86]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 6. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention provider
Comparison 7. Subgroup analysis: variations in professionally‐based intervention provider

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology at final study assessment Show forest plot

15

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Intervention provided by nurses

3

837

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.51, 1.04]

1.2 Intervention provided by physicians

1

446

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.90 [0.55, 1.49]

1.3 Intervention provided by midwives

10

5477

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.54, 1.07]

1.4 Intervention provided by mental health specialists

1

30

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.24, 4.18]

2 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression score at final study assessment Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Intervention provided by nurses

1

86

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.51, 0.34]

2.2 Intervention provided by midwives

1

840

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [‐0.09, 0.19]

2.3 Intervention provided by mental health specialists

2

175

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.26, 0.34]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 7. Subgroup analysis: variations in professionally‐based intervention provider
Comparison 8. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Individually‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

14

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

9

3947

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.49, 1.00]

1.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

6

2757

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.47, 0.91]

1.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

7

9806

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.88 [0.80, 0.98]

1.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

4

2786

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.51, 0.90]

2 Individually‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

11

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

4

882

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.11 [‐0.41, 0.19]

2.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

5

2601

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐1.07, 0.26]

2.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

6

8156

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.03, 0.05]

2.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

5

1457

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.78, 0.23]

3 Individually‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

3.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

2

677

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.32, 0.86]

3.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

4 Group‐based interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

6

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

4

946

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.45, 0.91]

4.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

1225

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.60, 1.39]

4.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

2

830

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.20 [0.85, 1.71]

4.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

1

150

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.74 [0.29, 1.88]

5 Group‐based interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

8

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

352

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.24 [‐0.80, 0.31]

5.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

1027

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.09, 0.16]

5.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

4

1788

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.08, 0.11]

5.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

2

990

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.07, 0.19]

6 Group‐based interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

2

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

2

225

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.05, 1.66]

7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment Show forest plot

20

14727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

7.1 Individually‐based interventions

14

12914

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.61, 0.92]

7.2 Group‐based interventions

6

1813

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.71, 1.19]

8 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment Show forest plot

19

12376

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.28, 0.01]

8.1 Individually‐based interventions

11

10092

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.37, 0.07]

8.2 Group‐based interventions

8

2284

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.08 [‐0.23, 0.06]

9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment Show forest plot

5

939

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.32, 0.78]

9.1 Individually‐based interventions

3

714

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.33, 0.84]

9.2 Group‐based interventions

2

225

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.05, 1.66]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 8. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention mode
Comparison 9. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Single‐contact interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

4

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

1756

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.39 [0.07, 2.16]

1.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

1

476

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.24 [0.81, 1.91]

1.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

3

2936

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.01 [0.82, 1.26]

1.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

1

1401

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.58, 1.37]

2 Single‐contact interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

2

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

1

476

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.10 [‐1.06, 0.86]

2.2 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

2

1362

Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [‐0.37, 0.79]

3 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

16

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

11

3137

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.77 [0.60, 0.99]

3.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

9

3506

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.52, 0.91]

3.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

6

7700

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.77, 1.01]

3.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

4

1535

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.47, 0.76]

4 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

17

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

6

1234

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.41, 0.09]

4.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

8

3152

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.30 [‐0.81, 0.22]

4.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

8

8582

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.04, 0.05]

4.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

7

2447

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.58, 0.25]

5 Multiple‐contact interventions ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

5.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.30, 0.74]

5.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

5.4 At final study assessment

5

939

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.31, 0.74]

6 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment Show forest plot

20

14727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

6.1 Single contact intervention

4

2877

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.38, 1.28]

6.2 Multiple contact intervention

16

11850

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment Show forest plot

19

12376

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.28, 0.01]

7.1 Single contact intervention

2

1362

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.04 [‐0.07, 0.15]

7.2 Multiple contact intervention

17

11014

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.32, 0.02]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 9. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention duration
Comparison 10. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Interventions with antenatal only component ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

4

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

1

35

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

‐0.44 [‐1.11, 0.23]

1.2 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

2

919

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.06 [‐0.07, 0.19]

1.3 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

2

883

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [‐0.09, 0.19]

2 Interventions with antenatal only component ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.00, 1.34]

3 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

8

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

7

1794

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.52, 1.08]

3.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

621

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.45, 0.97]

3.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

3

284

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.87 [0.41, 1.85]

3.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

2

273

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.46, 1.46]

4 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

4

518

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.18 [‐0.47, 0.11]

4.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

3

388

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.05 [‐0.25, 0.15]

4.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

3

315

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.22 [‐0.45, ‐0.00]

4.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

3

560

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.03 [‐0.20, 0.13]

5 Interventions with antenatal and postnatal components ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

3

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

5.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

2

255

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.40 [0.21, 0.79]

5.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

6 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

6.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

6

3099

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.41, 0.98]

6.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

6

3361

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.76 [0.53, 1.11]

6.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

6

10352

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.82, 1.06]

6.4 Long‐term outcomes >24 weeks

3

2663

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.46, 0.93]

7 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

8

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

7.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

2

716

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.69, 0.42]

7.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

5

3205

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.35 [1.00, 0.31]

7.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

5

8710

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.03, 0.06]

7.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

2

1004

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.59 [‐1.39, 0.21]

8 Interventions with postnatal only component ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

8.1 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

1

612

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.34, 1.23]

9 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment Show forest plot

20

14727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

9.1 Antenatal and postnatal intervention

8

1941

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.96 [0.75, 1.22]

9.2 Postnatal intervention only

12

12786

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.59, 0.90]

10 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment Show forest plot

19

12376

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.28, 0.01]

10.1 Antenatal intervention only

4

1050

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.03 [‐0.09, 0.16]

10.2 Antenatal and postnatal intervention

7

1000

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.31, 0.02]

10.3 Postnatal intervention only

8

10326

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.16 [‐0.40, 0.08]

11 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: diagnosis of depression: at final study assessment Show forest plot

5

939

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.31, 0.74]

11.1 Antenatal intervention only

1

35

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.08 [0.00, 1.34]

11.2 Antenatal and postnatal intervention

3

292

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.44 [0.24, 0.80]

11.3 Postnatal intervention only

1

612

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.34, 1.23]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 10. Subgroup analysis: variations in intervention onset
Comparison 11. Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

9

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

1.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

7

1301

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.67 [0.51, 0.88]

1.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

6

1368

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.59 [0.47, 0.75]

1.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

2

151

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.34 [0.60, 2.98]

1.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

2

281

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.60 [0.29, 1.24]

2 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

7

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

2.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

3

387

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.17 [‐0.52, 0.18]

2.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

5

1067

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.14 [‐0.26, ‐0.02]

2.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

1

30

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.02 [‐0.74, 0.70]

2.4 Long‐term outcomes >24 weeks

3

324

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.00 [‐0.22, 0.22]

3 Interventions for at‐risk women ‐ diagnosis of depression Show forest plot

5

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

3.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

1

39

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.09 [0.01, 1.47]

3.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

902

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.47 [0.30, 0.74]

3.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

1

37

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.64 [0.17, 2.46]

3.4 At final study assessment

5

939

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.31, 0.74]

4 Interventions for general population ‐ depressive symptomatology Show forest plot

12

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

4.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

7

3767

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.46, 1.03]

4.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

2614

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.58, 1.42]

4.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

7

10485

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.81, 1.06]

4.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

3

2655

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.71 [0.51, 0.99]

5 Interventions for general population ‐ mean depression scores Show forest plot

12

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Subtotals only

5.1 Immediate outcomes 0‐8 weeks

3

847

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.56, 0.25]

5.2 Short‐term outcomes 9‐16 weeks

4

2561

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.40 [‐1.24, 0.44]

5.3 Intermediate outcomes 17‐24 weeks

9

9914

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.01 [‐0.03, 0.05]

5.4 Long‐term outcomes > 24 weeks

4

2123

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.28 [‐0.87, 0.30]

6 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: depressive symptomatology: at final study assessment Show forest plot

20

14727

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.66, 0.93]

6.1 Interventions for at‐risk women

8

1853

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.66 [0.50, 0.88]

6.2 General population

12

12874

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.83 [0.68, 1.02]

7 TEST FOR SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES: mean depression scores: at final study assessment Show forest plot

19

12376

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.28, 0.01]

7.1 Interventions for at risk women

7

1087

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.13 [‐0.25, ‐0.01]

7.2 General population

12

11289

Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

‐0.15 [‐0.33, 0.04]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 11. Subgroup analysis: variations in sample selection criteria