Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Poor outcome, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Poor outcome, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.

Comparison 2 Case fatality, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Case fatality, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.

Comparison 3 Secondary ischaemia, Outcome 1 clinical signs of secondary ischaemia.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3 Secondary ischaemia, Outcome 1 clinical signs of secondary ischaemia.

Comparison 3 Secondary ischaemia, Outcome 2 infarct on CT/MR.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3 Secondary ischaemia, Outcome 2 infarct on CT/MR.

Comparison 4 Rebleeding, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4 Rebleeding, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.

Comparison 5 Complications, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 5.1

Comparison 5 Complications, Outcome 1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm.

Comparison 1. Poor outcome

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.0 [0.45, 2.22]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Poor outcome
Comparison 2. Case fatality

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.18, 3.20]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Case fatality
Comparison 3. Secondary ischaemia

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 clinical signs of secondary ischaemia Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.54, 2.16]

1.1 treatment started before occlusion of the aneurysm

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

1.2 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.08 [0.54, 2.16]

2 infarct on CT/MR Show forest plot

1

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.55, 5.53]

2.1 treatment started before occlusion of the aneurysm

0

0

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

2.2 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm

1

82

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.75 [0.55, 5.53]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Secondary ischaemia
Comparison 4. Rebleeding

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm Show forest plot

1

32

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.0 [0.0, 0.0]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Rebleeding
Comparison 5. Complications

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 treatment started after occlusion of the aneurysm Show forest plot

2

114

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.78 [0.85, 3.71]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 5. Complications