Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ambulatory oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This is not the most recent version

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000238Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 21 January 2002see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Airways Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Felix SF Ram

    Correspondence to: School of Health Sciences, Massey University ‐ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    [email protected]

  • Jadwiga A Wedzicha

    Royal Free & University College Medical School, London, UK

Contributions of authors

JW both completed all the different stages of this review. Felix Ram was a co‐author on the original version of this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support supplied

External sources

  • Felix Ram received funding from The Netherlands Astma Fonds, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

There are no known conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Members of the Cochrane Airways Group (Steve Milan, Karen Blackhall, Bettina Reuben) and Paul Jones the co‐ordinating editor of the Cochrane Airways Group for their help.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2014 Jun 24

Ambulatory oxygen for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who are not hypoxaemic at rest

Review

Faisal Ameer, Kristin V Carson, Zafar A Usmani, Brian J Smith

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000238.pub2

2002 Jan 21

Ambulatory oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Review

Felix SF Ram, Jadwiga A Wedzicha

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000238

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.