Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for treatment of sore throat in children and adults

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub5Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 09 December 2021see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2021 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Anneliese Spinks

    Correspondence to: School of Medicine, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Paul P Glasziou

    Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

  • Chris B Del Mar

    Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia

Contributions of authors

Chris Del Mar first conceived the review, presenting it as a meta‐analysis in a journal (Del Mar 1992a; Del Mar 1992b). It was subsequently improved and modified for the Cochrane Library with Paul Glasziou (who improved the subgroup analyses) and Anneliese Spinks (who updated the searches and completed the analyses).

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • No sources of support provided

External sources

  • No sources of support provided

Declarations of interest

Anneliese Spinks has declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Paul Glasziou is on the board of Therapeutic Guidelines Limited and holds a research grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council on antibiotic resistance.

Chris Del Mar has received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council for antibiotic resistance and from the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group and some consultancies (GSK for advice about vaccines for otitis media, and a local pharmaceutical company contemplating analgesic ear drops for otitis media).

Acknowledgements

A previous update was completed with the help of a Glaxo‐sponsored educational support grant from the Australasian Cochrane Centre. The 2006 update was supported by a grant from the UK NHS through the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group, based in Australia (at Bond University).

Thanks to Prof Jim Dickinson for helpful suggestions about dividing the studies into early and late last century in order to evaluate whether the pathogenesis of this illness, and/or its sequelae, have changed with time. Thanks to Ian Thomas and Michael Thomas for research assistance. Thanks to Beth Clewer and Katie Farmer, who in January 1999 drew our attention to mistakes in the data extraction by their careful checking of original studies as part of their medical student project at the University of Bristol Medical School. The authors wish to thank the following people for commenting on the 2006 update of the review: Craig Mellis, Mark Jones, and Tom Fahey; and the following people for commenting on the 2021 update: Dr Rashmi Ranjan Das, Additional Professor, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS Bhubaneswar, India; Maria Isabel Costa, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Portugal; Jonathan M Fuchs, FACHE, Chief Operating Officer, Kidder Street Consulting Group; Maryam Panahi, Teresa Neeman, and Tom Fahey. 

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Dec 09

Antibiotics for treatment of sore throat in children and adults

Review

Anneliese Spinks, Paul P Glasziou, Chris B Del Mar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub5

2013 Nov 05

Antibiotics for sore throat

Review

Anneliese Spinks, Paul P Glasziou, Chris B Del Mar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub4

2006 Oct 18

Antibiotics for sore throat

Review

Anneliese Spinks, Paul P Glasziou, Chris B Del Mar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub3

2004 Apr 19

Antibiotics for sore throat

Review

Chris Del Mar, Paul P Glasziou, Anneliese Spinks

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023.pub2

2000 Jun 28

Antibiotics for sore throat

Review

Chris Del Mar, Paul P Glasziou, Anneliese B Spinks

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000023

Differences between protocol and review

There were no substantial differences in the methods of data extraction or analysis between earlier versions of this review and the current 2021 update.

We revised decision making and reporting for risk of bias items and certainty of evidence levels in this update, as recommended by the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group in order to comply with current Cochrane methodological standards.

Keywords

MeSH

Medical Subject Headings Check Words

Adult; Child; Humans; Infant;

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Study flow diagram for the 2021 review update.

Figures and Tables -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram for the 2021 review update.

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figures and Tables -
Figure 2

Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figures and Tables -
Figure 3

Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throats: symptom of sore throat, outcome: 1.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3.

Figures and Tables -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throats: symptom of sore throat, outcome: 1.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptom of sore throat, outcome: 1.6 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days).

Figures and Tables -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptom of sore throat, outcome: 1.6 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days).

Funnel plot of comparison: 4 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, outcome: 4.1 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Rheumatic fever defined by clinical diagnosis.

Figures and Tables -
Figure 6

Funnel plot of comparison: 4 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, outcome: 4.1 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Rheumatic fever defined by clinical diagnosis.

Funnel plot of comparison: 4 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, outcome: 4.4 Incidence of otitis media within 14 days. Otitis media defined by clinical diagnosis.

Figures and Tables -
Figure 7

Funnel plot of comparison: 4 Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, outcome: 4.4 Incidence of otitis media within 14 days. Otitis media defined by clinical diagnosis.

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 1: Symptom of sore throat on day 3

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 1: Symptom of sore throat on day 3

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 2: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 2: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975)

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 3: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: blind versus unblinded studies

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 3: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: blind versus unblinded studies

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 4: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: antipyretics versus no antipyretics

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 4: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: antipyretics versus no antipyretics

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 5: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: GABHS‐positive throat swab, negative swab, untested/inseparable

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 5: Symptom of sore throat on day 3: GABHS‐positive throat swab, negative swab, untested/inseparable

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 6: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 6: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days)

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 7: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): early (pre‐1975) versus late (post‐1975)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 7: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): early (pre‐1975) versus late (post‐1975)

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 8: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): blind versus unblinded studies

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 8: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): blind versus unblinded studies

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 9: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): GABHS‐positive throat swab, GABHS‐negative swab

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat, Outcome 9: Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): GABHS‐positive throat swab, GABHS‐negative swab

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 1: Symptom of fever on day 3

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 1: Symptom of fever on day 3

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 2: Symptom of fever on day 3: blinded versus unblinded studies

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 2: Symptom of fever on day 3: blinded versus unblinded studies

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 3: Symptom of fever on day 3: children compared with adults

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 3: Symptom of fever on day 3: children compared with adults

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 4: Symptom of fever at 1 week (6 to 8 days)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever, Outcome 4: Symptom of fever at 1 week (6 to 8 days)

Comparison 3: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of headache, Outcome 1: Symptom of headache on day 3

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.1

Comparison 3: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of headache, Outcome 1: Symptom of headache on day 3

Comparison 3: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of headache, Outcome 2: Symptom of headache on day 3: blinded versus unblinded studies

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 3.2

Comparison 3: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of headache, Outcome 2: Symptom of headache on day 3: blinded versus unblinded studies

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 1: Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Rheumatic fever defined by clinical diagnosis

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.1

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 1: Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Rheumatic fever defined by clinical diagnosis

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 2: Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Penicillin versus placebo

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.2

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 2: Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Penicillin versus placebo

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 3: Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.3

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 3: Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975)

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 4: Incidence of otitis media within 14 days. Otitis media defined by clinical diagnosis

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.4

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 4: Incidence of otitis media within 14 days. Otitis media defined by clinical diagnosis

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 5: Incidence of otitis media within 14 days: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975)

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.5

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 5: Incidence of otitis media within 14 days: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975)

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 6: Incidence of sinusitis within 14 days. Sinusitis defined by clinical diagnosis

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.6

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 6: Incidence of sinusitis within 14 days. Sinusitis defined by clinical diagnosis

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 7: Incidence of quinsy within 2 months. Quinsy defined by clinical diagnosis

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.7

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 7: Incidence of quinsy within 2 months. Quinsy defined by clinical diagnosis

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 8: Incidence of acute glomerulonephritis within 1 month. Acute glomerulonephritis defined by clinical diagnosis

Figures and Tables -
Analysis 4.8

Comparison 4: Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications, Outcome 8: Incidence of acute glomerulonephritis within 1 month. Acute glomerulonephritis defined by clinical diagnosis

Summary of findings 1. Antibiotics compared with control for sore throat

Antibiotics compared with control for sore throat

Patient or population: adults and children presenting with sore throat

Settings: community

Intervention: antibiotics

Comparison: control (placebo or no treatment)

Outcomes

Anticipated absolute effects

(95% CI)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

No. of participants
(studies)

Certainty of the evidence
(GRADE)

Comments

Risk with

control

Risk with antibiotics

 

Sore throat: day 3

660

462 (396 to 528) 

RR 0.70 (0.60 to 0.80)

3730
(16 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea

 

Sore throat: 1 week

190

95 (65 to 143)

RR 0.50 (0.34 to 0.75)

3083
(14 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea

 

Fever: day 3

197

148 (104 to 211)

RR 0.75 (0.53 to 1.07)

1443
(8 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

 

Headache: day 3

421

206 (143 to 295)

RR 0.49 (0.34 to 0.70)

1020
(4 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

 

Rheumatic fever (within 2 months, clinical diagnosis)

190

61 (34 to 110)

Peto OR 0.32 (0.18 to 0.58)

12,132
(17 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
Moderatea

Based largely on risk in pre‐1960 trials

Glomerulonephritis (within 1 month, clinical diagnosis)

1

0 (0 to 2)

Peto OR 0.07 (0.00 to 1.32)

5147
(10 studies)

⊕⊝⊝⊝
Lowb

Sparse data: 2 cases only in the placebo group

Quinsy (within 2 months, clinical diagnosis)

23

3 (1 to 11)

Peto OR 0.16 (0.07 to 0.35)

2367
(7 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

 

Otitis media (within 14 days, clinical diagnosis)

20

5 (3 to 11)

Peto OR 0.21 (0.11 to 0.40)

3646
(10 studies)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
High

 

The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; RR: risk ratio

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High certainty: we are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate certainty: we are moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low certainty: our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low certainty: we have very little confidence in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

aDowngraded one level for high level of heterogeneity.
bDowngraded two levels for serious imprecision relating to very small number of reported cases.

Figures and Tables -
Summary of findings 1. Antibiotics compared with control for sore throat
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3 Show forest plot

16

3730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.60, 0.80]

1.2 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975) Show forest plot

16

3730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.60, 0.80]

1.2.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: early (pre‐1975) studies

6

1141

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.56, 0.69]

1.2.2 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: late (post‐1975) studies

10

2589

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.60, 0.88]

1.3 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: blind versus unblinded studies Show forest plot

16

3730

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.70 [0.60, 0.80]

1.3.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: blinded studies

12

2662

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.65 [0.54, 0.78]

1.3.2 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: unblinded studies

4

1068

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.81 [0.65, 1.01]

1.4 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: antipyretics versus no antipyretics Show forest plot

5

1137

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.48, 0.70]

1.4.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: antipyretics administered

3

455

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.33, 0.81]

1.4.2 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: no antipyretics administered

2

682

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.55, 0.70]

1.5 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: GABHS‐positive throat swab, negative swab, untested/inseparable Show forest plot

15

3600

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.68 [0.59, 0.78]

1.5.1 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: GABHS‐positive throat swab

11

1839

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.58 [0.48, 0.71]

1.5.2 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: GABHS‐negative throat swab

6

736

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.78 [0.63, 0.97]

1.5.3 Symptom of sore throat on day 3: untested for GABHS culture or combined, inseparable data

3

1025

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.80, 1.00]

1.6 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days) Show forest plot

14

3083

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.34, 0.75]

1.7 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): early (pre‐1975) versus late (post‐1975) Show forest plot

14

3083

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.50 [0.34, 0.75]

1.7.1 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): early (pre‐1975) studies

6

1140

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.14 [0.08, 0.27]

1.7.2 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): late (post‐1975) studies

8

1943

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.55, 0.97]

1.8 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): blind versus unblinded studies Show forest plot

14

3053

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.39, 0.82]

1.8.1 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): blinded studies

9

1616

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.62 [0.38, 1.03]

1.8.2 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): unblinded studies

5

1437

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.43 [0.20, 0.91]

1.9 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): GABHS‐positive throat swab, GABHS‐negative swab Show forest plot

12

2524

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.29, 0.80]

1.9.1 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): GABHS‐positive throat swab

7

1117

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.29 [0.12, 0.70]

1.9.2 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): GABHS‐negative throat swab

5

541

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.73 [0.50, 1.07]

1.9.3 Symptom of sore throat at 1 week (6 to 8 days): GABHS untested

3

866

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.35 [0.03, 4.47]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of sore throat
Comparison 2. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

2.1 Symptom of fever on day 3 Show forest plot

8

1443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.53, 1.07]

2.2 Symptom of fever on day 3: blinded versus unblinded studies Show forest plot

8

1443

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.75 [0.53, 1.07]

2.2.1 Symptom of fever on day 3: blinded studies

4

703

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.82 [0.54, 1.23]

2.2.2 Symptom of fever on day 3: unblinded studies

4

740

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.72 [0.43, 1.21]

2.3 Symptom of fever on day 3: children compared with adults Show forest plot

5

766

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.63 [0.31, 1.26]

2.3.1 Symptom of fever on day 3: children

2

61

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.27 [0.76, 2.13]

2.3.2 Symptom of fever on day 3: adults

3

705

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.48 [0.21, 1.10]

2.4 Symptom of fever at 1 week (6 to 8 days) Show forest plot

4

886

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.91 [0.55, 1.52]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of fever
Comparison 3. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of headache

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

3.1 Symptom of headache on day 3 Show forest plot

4

1020

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.34, 0.70]

3.2 Symptom of headache on day 3: blinded versus unblinded studies Show forest plot

4

1020

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.49 [0.34, 0.70]

3.2.1 Symptom of headache on day 3: blinded studies

2

436

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.33 [0.09, 1.20]

3.2.2 Symptom of headache on day 3: unblinded studies

2

584

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.57 [0.45, 0.72]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 3. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: symptoms of headache
Comparison 4. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

4.1 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Rheumatic fever defined by clinical diagnosis Show forest plot

17

12132

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.36 [0.26, 0.50]

4.2 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months. Penicillin versus placebo Show forest plot

14

8407

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.26 [0.18, 0.40]

4.3 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975) Show forest plot

15

9984

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.20, 0.45]

4.3.1 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months: early (pre‐1975) studies

10

7617

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.30 [0.20, 0.45]

4.3.2 Incidence of acute rheumatic fever within 2 months: late (post‐1975) studies

5

2367

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

Not estimable

4.4 Incidence of otitis media within 14 days. Otitis media defined by clinical diagnosis Show forest plot

10

3646

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.11, 0.40]

4.5 Incidence of otitis media within 14 days: early (pre‐1975) versus late studies (post‐1975) Show forest plot

10

3646

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.21 [0.11, 0.40]

4.5.1 Incidence of otitis media within 14 days: early (pre‐1975) studies

5

1837

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.25 [0.12, 0.52]

4.5.2 Incidence of otitis media within 14 days: late (post‐1975) studies

5

1809

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.05 [0.01, 0.31]

4.6 Incidence of sinusitis within 14 days. Sinusitis defined by clinical diagnosis Show forest plot

7

2270

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.10, 2.05]

4.7 Incidence of quinsy within 2 months. Quinsy defined by clinical diagnosis Show forest plot

7

2367

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.16 [0.07, 0.35]

4.8 Incidence of acute glomerulonephritis within 1 month. Acute glomerulonephritis defined by clinical diagnosis Show forest plot

10

5147

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

0.07 [0.00, 1.32]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 4. Antibiotics versus control for the treatment of sore throat: incidence of complications