Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Huperzine A for vascular dementia

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of Huperzine A for the treatment of patients with vascular dementia.

Background

Description of the condition

Vascular dementia (VaD) is a term used to describe a constellation of cognitive and functional impairment that can be viewed as a subset of the larger syndrome of vascular cognitive impairment associated with cerebrovascular brain injury (Aggarwal 2007). It is the second most common form of dementia after Alzheimer's disease among the elderly (O'Brien 2003). Subtypes of VaD can be briefed as follows (O'Brien 2006;Demaerschalk 2007):

  • Multi‐infarct dementia (cortical VaD:predominantly resulting from large cortical infarcts)

  • Small‐vessel dementia (subcortical VaD, predominantly resulting from subcortical lacunes, white and/or deep grey matter lesions)

  • Strategic infarct dementia (resulting from a unilateral or bilateral infarct in strategic area (i.e. thalamus, hippocampus))

  • Hypoperfusion dementia (resulting from brain damage from hypoperfusion)

  • Hemorrhagic dementia

  • Alzheimer's disease with CVD (sometimes known as "mixed dementia")

  • Hereditary vascular dementia (CADASIL)

A meta‐analysis of the European studies on the incidence of dementia showed that vascular dementia constituted 17.6% of all incident dementia (Grossman 2006). In Europe and North America, Alzheimer's disease (AD) predominates over VaD in a 2:1 ratio; in contrast, in Japan and China, VaD accounts for almost 50% of all dementias (Roman 2004). The divergent epidemiological trend may be due to different diagnostic criteria and study populations (Karirajan 2007). With increasing aging people in most parts of the world, including China and India where more than two billion people live, it is likely that the interactions between dementia, stroke, and cardiovascular disease will become increasingly important. It is anticipated that with progressive aging of the population and decline in mortality after stroke, vascular dementia will become the most common form of dementia (Gustavo 2005). However, there is no definitive medical or surgical treatment for vascular dementia. Cholinergic deficits are well documented in VaD, independent of any concomitant AD pathology (Erkinjuntti 2004). Cholinergic structures in the brain are vulnerable to ischemic damage. In humans, there is a loss of cholinergic neurons in 40% of VaD patients examined neuropathologically, with reduced acetylcholine activity in the cortex, hippocampus, and striatum (Demaerschalk 2007). It is believed that cholinesterase inhibitors, which are indicated for the treatment of mild to moderate AD, may also provide benefit for patients with VaD (Farlow 2006).The best evidence to date supports the benefit of donepezil in improving cognition function, clinical global impression and activities of daily living in patients with probable or possible mild to moderate vascular cognitive impairment after six months treatment and data confirmed that donepezil was well tolerated, and most of the side effects (nausea, diarrhoea, anorexia and cramp which appeared most frequently) were transient and were resolved by stopping the medication, and there were no significant differences for donepezil compared with placebo for the number who suffered serious adverse events (Malouf 2004). Galantamine was also effective in the areas of cognition and executive functioning in one trial but this was not seen in a second trial which included a smaller numbers of relevant patients. In both considered trials galantamine produced higher rates of gastrointestinal side effects (Craig 2006). Due to insufficient evidence, rivastigmine cannot yet be recommended for the treatment of vascular cognitive impairment (Craig 2004). With memantine, the small beneficial effect on cognition was not clinically detectable in those with vascular dementia and was detectable in those with AD; memantine is well tolerated. There was no significant difference in the number of patients experiencing at least one adverse event (McShane 2006).

Description of the intervention

Some traditional Chinese herbal medicines have been developed for treating VaD. Huperzine A is one such herbal medicine, which is a kind of alkaloid isolated from the Chinese herb Huperzia serrata.

How the intervention might work

It is a potent, highly specific and reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) of the central nervous system. It has been authorized for treating AD and benign memory deficits since 1994 in China (Han 2006). The drug is available as a nutraceutical in the US (Little 2008). However, there have been no published controlled clinical trials outside China assessing its toxicity and efficacy. Few side effects were observed in clinical trials and the side effects (those most frequently observed are mild dizziness, abdominal distention, and nausea) were transient and were resolved by stopping the medication or improved with symptomatic treatment (Li 2001; Wang 2004; Zhong 2004).

Compared with tacrine, donepezil, and rivastigmine, Huperzine A has better penetration through the blood‐brain barrier, higher oral bioavailability, and longer duration of AChE inhibitory action (Wang 2006).

Recent data have shown that Huperzine A may have neuroprotective effects that go beyond the inhibition of AChE. These effects include modification of beta‐amyloid peptide processing, reduction of oxidative stress, neuronal protection against apoptosis, and regulation of the expression and secretion of nerve growth factor (NGF) and NGF signalling (Zhang 2006).

Why it is important to do this review

With the extension of clinical application, Huperzine A has even been considered as an alternative treatment in clinical practice and used as a standard control intervention in clinical trials, but its effectiveness and safety in vascular dementia are still uncertain. We therefore sought to undertake a rigorous systematic review of the existing evidence to determine whether Huperzine A can be recommended for routine use in patients with vascular dementia.

Objectives

To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of Huperzine A for the treatment of patients with vascular dementia.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

We will include randomized controlled trials with acceptable methodological quality comparing Huperzine A with placebo or no treatment in patients with vascular dementia. Non‐randomized trials will be excluded.

Types of participants

Participants of any age or sex, with a diagnosis of vascular dementia according to accepted criteria, will be eligible for inclusion. The accepted criteria are as follows: DSM‐III or DSM‐III‐R or DSM‐IV (APA 1980; APA 1987; APA 1994), NINDS‐AIREN (National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) and ICD‐9 or ‐10 (International Classification of Diseases) (ICD 1989; WHO 1992) or other validated and reliable criteria, such as the Ischemic Scale (Hachinski 1975), research criteria for subcortical vascular dementia (Erkinjuntti 2000) and Mayo Clinic criteria (Knopman 2002).

Types of interventions

Trials evaluating Huperzine A will be included regardless of length of treatment period and dosage of treatment. The control interventions are placebo.

Types of outcome measures

1. Cognition function
2. Behavior
3. Global function
4. Mortality
5. Safety and adverse effects
6. Caregiver burden
7. Quality of life

Search methods for identification of studies

1. A search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group will be carried out at the Editorial base using the term huperzi*.

2. Chinese Databases

The following Chinese databases will be searched:

  • CBM (The Chinese Biomedical Database) (1977 to present)

  • VIP Chinese Science and Technique Journals Database (1989 to present)

  • China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (1979 to present)

  • The Chinese Clinical Trials Register (ChiCTR)

  • Google

3. In addition, we will search all reference lists of retrieved articles. Where necessary we will also attempt to contact study authors to obtain further data.

There will be no language restrictions.

The Ovid MEDLINE search strategy is given in Table 1; the strategies for other databases will be modified as necessary.

Open in table viewer
Table 1. Ovid MEDLINE search strategy

1. "alzheimer disease"/

2. "creutzfeldt jakob syndrome"/

3. exp Dementia/

4. "dementia vascular"/

5. "kluver bucy syndrome"/

6. "lewy body disease"/

7. "pick disease of the brain"/

8. "huntington disease"/

9. "delirium"/

10. "wernicke encephalopathy"/

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. dement*.mp.

13. alzheimer*.mp.

14. (lewy* and bod*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

15. deliri*.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

16. ((cognit* or memory* or mental*) and (declin* or impair* or los* or deteriorat*)).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

17. (chronic and cerebrovascular).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

18. ("organic brain syndrome" or "organic brain disease").mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

19. "supra nuclear palsy".mp.

20. ("normal pressure hydrocephalus" and shunt*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

21. "benign senescent forgetfulness".mp.

22. (cerebr* and deteriorat*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

23. (cerebr* and insufficien*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

24. (confusion* or confused).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

25. (Pick* and disease).mp.

26. (creutzfeldt or JCD or CJD).mp.

27. Huntington*.mp.

28. Binswanger*.mp.

29. korsako*.mp.

30. "korsakoff syndrome"/

31. (Wernicke* and (syndrome or encephalopathy)).mp.

32. 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31

33. 11 or 32

34. huperzin*.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

35. ayapin.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

36. scoparon*.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

37. drugs, Chinese Herbal/

38. exp Medicine, Oriental Traditional/

39. Plants, Medicinal/

40. 34 or 35 or 36 or 37 or 38 or 39

41. randomized controlled trial.pt.

42. controlled clinical trial.pt.

43. randomized.ab.

44. placebo.ab.

45. drug therapy.fs.

46. randomly.ab.

47. trial.ab.

48. groups.ab.

49. 41 or 42 or 43 or 44 or 45 or 46 or 47 or 48

50. humans.sh.

51. 49 and 50

52. 33 and 40

53. 51 and 52

Data collection and analysis

Study selection

The title, abstract and keywords of every record will be scanned independently by two reviewers to determine which studies require further assessment. The full article will be retrieved when the information given in the titles, abstracts and keywords conform to the selection criteria outlined previously. Any disagreements will be resolved by discussion, when necessary, in consultation with a third review author. If it is not possible to resolve a disagreement, we will add the study to those awaiting assessment and we will contact the study authors for clarification.

Quality assessment

Quality assessment will be done by assessing whether each included trial meets the following internal validity criteria.
(1) Method of randomization.
A ‐ adequate sequence generation is reported using one of following approaches: random number tables or computer‐generated random numbers.
B ‐ does not specify one of the adequate methods outlined in (A) but only mentioned 'random'.
C ‐ other methods of allocation that appeared to be unbiased.
(2) Adequate allocation concealment.
A ‐ adequate measures to conceal allocation such as central controlled randomization; sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes; or another description that contains convincing elements of concealment.
B ‐ unclearly‐concealed trials in which the author does not report an allocation concealment approach at all.
C ‐ inadequately‐concealed allocation that reports an approach that does not fall into one of the categories in (A).
(3) Blinding.
A ‐ blinding of study participants (the recipients and providers of care), blinding of outcome assessors, or both.
B ‐ single blinding (blinding of patients).
C ‐ non‐blinding.
(4) Numbers lost to follow up.
A ‐ trials where an intention‐to‐treat analysis is possible and few losses to follow up are noted.
B ‐ trials which report exclusions (as listed in (A) but exclusions were less than 10%).
C ‐ no reporting on exclusions or exclusions of more than 10%, or wide differences in exclusions between groups.
(5) Intention to treat analysis.

Quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers and disagreements between reviewers arising at any stage will be resolved by discussion or with a third party when necessary.

Data extraction

Data concerning details of patient characteristics, methods, interventions, and outcomes will be extracted independently by two authors using a data extraction form. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion. Missing data will be obtained from the study authors whenever possible. For dichotomous outcomes, the number of participants experiencing the event and the total number of participants in each arm of the trial will be extracted. For continuous outcomes, the mean value and standard deviation for the changes in each arm of the trial will be extracted along with the total number in each group. Wherever possible, outcomes from the intention‐to‐treat (ITT) population will be used, and if not, then observed case or per‐protocol outcomes will be extracted.

Data analysis

Results for dichotomous will be expressed as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and results for continuous outcomes will be expressed as mean difference or standardized mean difference. A fixed‐effect approach will be used unless there is substantial heterogeneity, in which case a random‐effects approach will be used and the potentiaI causes of heterogeneity will be examined. Inconsistency across studies will be quantified using I2. A value greater than 50% will be considered substantial heterogeneity.

Subgroup analysis will be used to explore possible sources of heterogeneity: age, sex, type and severity of vascular dementia, dosage levels, route of drug administration (injection or oral) and duration of treatment.

Sensitivity analyses will be performed as follows:

  • Excluding studies with inadequate concealment of allocation.

  • Excluding studies in which outcome evaluation was not blinded.

  • Excluding studies in which loss to follow up was not reported or was greater than 10%.

Potential publication bias will be investigated by using a funnel plot.

Table 1. Ovid MEDLINE search strategy

1. "alzheimer disease"/

2. "creutzfeldt jakob syndrome"/

3. exp Dementia/

4. "dementia vascular"/

5. "kluver bucy syndrome"/

6. "lewy body disease"/

7. "pick disease of the brain"/

8. "huntington disease"/

9. "delirium"/

10. "wernicke encephalopathy"/

11. 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 or 10

12. dement*.mp.

13. alzheimer*.mp.

14. (lewy* and bod*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

15. deliri*.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

16. ((cognit* or memory* or mental*) and (declin* or impair* or los* or deteriorat*)).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

17. (chronic and cerebrovascular).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

18. ("organic brain syndrome" or "organic brain disease").mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

19. "supra nuclear palsy".mp.

20. ("normal pressure hydrocephalus" and shunt*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

21. "benign senescent forgetfulness".mp.

22. (cerebr* and deteriorat*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

23. (cerebr* and insufficien*).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

24. (confusion* or confused).mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

25. (Pick* and disease).mp.

26. (creutzfeldt or JCD or CJD).mp.

27. Huntington*.mp.

28. Binswanger*.mp.

29. korsako*.mp.

30. "korsakoff syndrome"/

31. (Wernicke* and (syndrome or encephalopathy)).mp.

32. 12 or 13 or 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 or 18 or 19 or 20 or 21 or 22 or 23 or 24 or 25 or 26 or 27 or 28 or 29 or 30 or 31

33. 11 or 32

34. huperzin*.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

35. ayapin.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

36. scoparon*.mp. [mp=title, original title, abstract, name of substance word, subject heading word]

37. drugs, Chinese Herbal/

38. exp Medicine, Oriental Traditional/

39. Plants, Medicinal/

40. 34 or 35 or 36 or 37 or 38 or 39

41. randomized controlled trial.pt.

42. controlled clinical trial.pt.

43. randomized.ab.

44. placebo.ab.

45. drug therapy.fs.

46. randomly.ab.

47. trial.ab.

48. groups.ab.

49. 41 or 42 or 43 or 44 or 45 or 46 or 47 or 48

50. humans.sh.

51. 49 and 50

52. 33 and 40

53. 51 and 52

Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Ovid MEDLINE search strategy