Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Study flow diagram.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 1

Study flow diagram.

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 2

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 3

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Heparin versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Mortality at 12 months‐ Main analysis.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 4

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Heparin versus placebo, outcome: 1.1 Mortality at 12 months‐ Main analysis.

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Heparin versus placebo, outcome: 1.7 Symptomatic VTE‐ Main analysis.

Figuras y tablas -
Figure 5

Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Heparin versus placebo, outcome: 1.7 Symptomatic VTE‐ Main analysis.

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 1: Mortality at 12 months‐ Main analysis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 1: Mortality at 12 months‐ Main analysis

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 2: Mortality at 12 months‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 2: Mortality at 12 months‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 3: Mortality at 12 months‐ Subgroups Advanced vs non‐Advanced

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 3: Mortality at 12 months‐ Subgroups Advanced vs non‐Advanced

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 4: Mortality at 24 months‐ Main Analysis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 4: Mortality at 24 months‐ Main Analysis

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 5: Mortality at 24 months‐ Subgroups Advanced vs non‐Advanced

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 5: Mortality at 24 months‐ Subgroups Advanced vs non‐Advanced

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 6: Mortality over duration of study

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.6

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 6: Mortality over duration of study

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 7: Symptomatic VTE‐ Main analysis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.7

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 7: Symptomatic VTE‐ Main analysis

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 8: Symptomatic VTE‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.8

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 8: Symptomatic VTE‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 9: PE

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.9

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 9: PE

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 10: Symptomatic DVT

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.10

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 10: Symptomatic DVT

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 11: Major bleeding‐ Main analysis

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.11

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 11: Major bleeding‐ Main analysis

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 12: Major bleeding‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.12

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 12: Major bleeding‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 13: Minor bleeding

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.13

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 13: Minor bleeding

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 14: Thrombocytopenia

Figuras y tablas -
Analysis 1.14

Comparison 1: Heparin versus placebo, Outcome 14: Thrombocytopenia

Summary of findings 1. Heparin prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer without VTE receiving systemic therapy

Heparin prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer without VTE receiving systemic therapy

P: Ambulatory patients with cancer without VTE receiving systemic therapy

I: Heparin prophylaxis

C: No prophylaxis

S: Outpatient

Outcomes

№ of participants
(studies)
Follow‐up

Quality of the evidence
(GRADE)

Relative effect
(95% CI)

Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI)

Risk with No prophylaxis

Risk difference with Heparin prophylaxis

Mortality
follow‐up: 12 months

9575
(18 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

RR 0.98
(0.93 to 1.03)

Study population

504 per 1000

10 fewer per 1000
(35 fewer to 15 more)

Mortality
follow‐up: 24 months

5229
(14 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 1

RR 0.99
(0.96 to 1.01)

Study population

778 per 1000

8 fewer per 1000
(31 fewer to 8 more)

Symptomatic VTE
follow‐up: 12 months

9036
(16 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

RR 0.56
(0.47 to 0.68)

Study population

68 per 1000

30 fewer per 1000
(36 fewer to 22 fewer)

Major bleeding
follow‐up: 12 months

9592
(18 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 2

RR 1.30
(0.94 to 1.79)

Study population

14 per 1000

4 more per 1000
(1 fewer to 11 more)

Minor bleeding
follow‐up: 12 months

9245
(16 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊕
HIGH

RR 1.70
(1.13 to 2.55)

Study population

24 per 1000

17 more per 1000
(3 more to 37 more)

Thrombocytopenia

5832
(12 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 3

RR 0.69
(0.37 to 1.27)

Study population

105 per 1000

33 fewer per 1000
(66 fewer to 28 more)

Quality of life impairment

2241
(2 RCTs)

⊕⊕⊕⊝
MODERATE 4

Macbeth 2016 (FRAGMATIC): " There was no difference between the two groups with respect to quality‐adjusted life years gained in the first year... No difference in overall quality of life at 6 months (P = .94) or at 12 months (P = .89)... Overall quality of life did not change significantly over the study period".Sideras 2006: "The QOL and SDS scores were similar, both at baseline and during the protocol period, in patients randomized to receive LMWH vs those not randomized to receive LMWH."

*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; OR: Odds ratio;

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded one level due to serious imprecision: Confidence interval includes values suggesting clinically significant benefit and values suggesting no effect.

2 Downgraded one level due to serious imprecision: Confidence interval includes values suggesting clinically significant harm and values suggesting no effect.

3 Downgraded one level due to serious imprecision: Confidence interval includes values suggesting clinically significant benefit and values suggesting harm.

4 Downgraded one level due to serious risk of bias: Both studies were open‐label studies (lack of blinding may impact the patient‐reported subjective outcomes)

Figuras y tablas -
Summary of findings 1. Heparin prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer without VTE receiving systemic therapy
Table 1. Glossary

Term

Definition

Adjuvant therapy

Assisting in the amelioration or cure of disease

Anticoagulation

The process of hindering the clotting of blood especially by treatment with an anticoagulant

Antithrombotic

Used against or tending to prevent thrombosis (clotting)

Bacteremia

The presence of bacteria in the blood

Central venous line

Synthetic tube that is inserted into a central (large) vein of a patient to provide temporary intravenous access for the administration of fluid, medication or nutrients

Coagulation

Clotting

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)

A condition marked by the formation of a thrombus within a deep vein (as of the leg or pelvis) that may be asymptomatic or be accompanied by symptoms (such as swelling and pain) and that is potentially life‐threatening if dislodgment of the thrombus results in pulmonary embolism

Fibrin

A white insoluble fibrous protein formed from fibrinogen by the action of thrombin, especially in the clotting of blood

Fondaparinux

An anticoagulant medication

Hemostatic system

The system that shortens the clotting time of blood and stops bleeding

Heparin

An enzyme occurring especially in the liver and lungs that prolongs the clotting time of blood by preventing the formation of fibrin. Two forms of heparin that are used as anticoagulant medications are: unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low molecular weight heparins (LMWH)

Impedance plethysmography

A technique that measures the change in blood volume (venous blood volume as well as the pulsation of the arteries) for a specific body segment

Kappa statistics

A measure of degree of non‐random agreement between observers and/or measurements of a specific categorical variable

Metastasis

The spread of cancer cells from the initial or primary site of disease to another part of the body

Oncogene

A gene having the potential to cause a normal cell to become cancerous

Osteoporosis

A condition that especially affects older women and is characterized by a decrease in bone mass with decreased density and enlargement of bone spaces producing porosity and brittleness

Parenteral nutrition

The practice of feeding a patient intravenously, circumventing the gut

Pulmonary embolism (PE)

Embolism of a pulmonary artery or one of its branches that is produced by foreign matter and most often a blood clot originating in a vein of the leg or pelvis and that is marked by labored breathing, chest pain, fainting, rapid heart rate, cyanosis, shock and sometimes death

Stroma

The supporting framework of an organ typically consisting of connective tissue

Thrombin

A proteolytic enzyme formed from prothrombin that facilitates the clotting of blood by catalyzing conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin

Thrombocytopenia

Persistent decrease in the number of blood platelets that is often associated with hemorrhagic conditions

Thrombosis

The formation or presence of a blood clot within a blood vessel

Vitamin K antagonists

Anticoagulant medications that are used for anticoagulation. Warfarin is a vitamin K antagonist

Warfarin

An anticoagulant medication that is a vitamin K antagonist, which is used for anticoagulation

Ximelagatran

An anticoagulant medication

Figuras y tablas -
Table 1. Glossary
Table 2. LMWH: definitions of prophylactic and therapeutic dosages

LMWH

Generic name

Prophylactic dose

Therapeutic dose

Lovenox

Enoxaparin

40 mg once daily

1 mg/kg twice daily

Fragmin

Dalteparin

2500 to 5000 units once daily

200 U/kg once daily or
100 U/kg twice daily

Innohep, Logiparin

Tinzaparin

4500 units once daily

90 U/kg twice daily

Fraxiparine

Nadroparin

35 to 75 anti‐Xa international units/kg once daily

175 anti‐Xa int. units/kg once daily

Certoparin

Sandoparin

3000 anti‐Xa international units once daily

Figuras y tablas -
Table 2. LMWH: definitions of prophylactic and therapeutic dosages
Comparison 1. Heparin versus placebo

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1.1 Mortality at 12 months‐ Main analysis Show forest plot

18

9575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.93, 1.03]

1.2 Mortality at 12 months‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer Show forest plot

12

4768

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.94 [0.86, 1.03]

1.2.1 Lung Cancer (SCLC or NSCLC)

6

3204

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.89 [0.73, 1.08]

1.2.2 non‐Lung Cancer

7

1564

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.95 [0.88, 1.03]

1.3 Mortality at 12 months‐ Subgroups Advanced vs non‐Advanced Show forest plot

18

9575

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.94, 1.03]

1.3.1 Advanced cancer

12

6115

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.93, 1.02]

1.3.2 Non‐advanced cancer

8

3460

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.92 [0.75, 1.12]

1.4 Mortality at 24 months‐ Main Analysis Show forest plot

14

5229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.96, 1.01]

1.5 Mortality at 24 months‐ Subgroups Advanced vs non‐Advanced Show forest plot

14

5229

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.99 [0.96, 1.01]

1.5.1 Advanced cancer

6

1554

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.93, 1.03]

1.5.2 Non‐advanced cancer

8

3675

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.98 [0.93, 1.04]

1.6 Mortality over duration of study Show forest plot

15

Hazard Ratio (IV, Random, 95% CI)

0.93 [0.84, 1.03]

1.7 Symptomatic VTE‐ Main analysis Show forest plot

16

9036

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.56 [0.47, 0.68]

1.8 Symptomatic VTE‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer Show forest plot

11

8090

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.52 [0.43, 0.63]

1.8.1 Lung Cancer (SCLC or NSCLC)

6

4217

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.53 [0.41, 0.68]

1.8.2 Non‐lung cancer

7

3873

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.51 [0.37, 0.70]

1.9 PE Show forest plot

14

8867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.61 [0.47, 0.80]

1.10 Symptomatic DVT Show forest plot

14

8867

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.46 [0.33, 0.63]

1.11 Major bleeding‐ Main analysis Show forest plot

18

9592

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.30 [0.94, 1.79]

1.12 Major bleeding‐ Subgroups Lung vs non‐Lung Cancer Show forest plot

10

4163

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.62 [1.02, 2.56]

1.12.1 Lung Cancer (SCLC or NSCLC)

5

3035

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.45 [0.77, 2.73]

1.12.2 Non‐lung cancer

5

1128

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.84 [0.94, 3.58]

1.13 Minor bleeding Show forest plot

16

9245

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

1.70 [1.13, 2.55]

1.14 Thrombocytopenia Show forest plot

12

5832

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

0.69 [0.37, 1.27]

Figuras y tablas -
Comparison 1. Heparin versus placebo