Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

available in

Background

Although conventional colonoscopy is the most sensitive test available for the investigation of the colorectum for polyps, there are data that raise concerns about its sensitivity. Chromoscopy may be one way of enhancing the ability for colonoscopy to detect polyps particularly diminutive flat lesions that may be otherwise difficult to detect.

Objectives

To determine whether the use of chromoscopy enhances detection of polyps and neoplasia during endoscopic examination of the colon and rectum.

Search methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched along with a hand search of abstracts from relevant meetings. Search terms included randomised trials containing combinations of the following: 'chromoscopy' 'colonoscopy' 'dye‐spray' 'chromo‐endoscopy' 'indigo‐carmine' 'magnifying endoscopy'.

Selection criteria

All prospective randomised trials comparing chromoscopic with conventional endoscopic examination of the lower gastrointestinal tract were included. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease or polyposis syndromes were excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Three reviewers assessed the methodological quality of potentially eligible trials and independently extracted data from the included trials. Outcome measures included the detection of polyps (neoplastic and non‐neoplastic), the detection of diminutive lesions, the number of patients with multiple neoplastic lesions and the extubation time.

Main results

Four trials were include that met the inclusion criteria and although there were some methodological drawbacks and differences in study design, combining the results showed a significant difference in favour of chromoscopy for all detection outcomes. In particular, chromoscopy is likely to yield significantly more patients with at least one neoplastic lesion (OR 1.61 (CI 1.24‐2.09)) and significantly more patients with three or more neoplastic lesions (OR 2.55 (CI 1.49‐4.36)). Not surprisingly the withdrawal times were significantly slower for the chromoscopy group.

Authors' conclusions

There appears to be strong evidence that chromoscopy enhances the detection of neoplasia in the colon and rectum. Patients with neoplastic polyps, particularly those with multiple polyps, are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer. Such lesions, which presumably would be missed with conventional colonoscopy, could contribute to the interval cancer numbers on any surveillance programme.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum

Colonoscopy is a diagnostic test that enables small growths in the bowel (polyps) to be detected. These lesions are precursors to cancer. Although the test is the most sensitive test around for the detection of these growths, some may be missed. If a simple dye spraying technique is used with the colonoscopic test, the detection of these lesions appears to be enhanced. This may make colonoscopy more sensitive.