Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Probiotics for prevention of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

The primary objective is to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic enteral probiotics administration versus placebo or no treatment in the prevention of severe (stage II or more) NEC and/or sepsis preterm infants. The secondary objective is to conduct a subgroup analysis to investigate the effect of probiotics in Extreme Low Birth Weight (ELBW < 1000 gm) infants.

Background

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common serious, acquired disease of the gastrointestinal tract in preterm infants (Lee 2003). It is characterized by bowel wall necrosis of various length and depth, with perforation in one third of affected infants (Kafetzis 2003). Although 5 ‐ 25% of cases occur in term infants, it is primarily a disease of preterm infants with majority of cases occurring in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW < 1500 gm) infants (Kosloske 1994). NEC is categorized into three different stages with clinical symptoms varying from feeding intolerance to severe cardiovascular compromise, coagulopathy, peritonitis, with or without pneumoperitoneum (Bell 1978).

The incidence of NEC varies among countries and neonatal centers. It has been reported to affect up to 10% of VLBW infants (Kosloske 1994). These infants represent some of the sickest infants in the Neonatal intensive Care Unit (NICU) and exhibit a mortality rate up to 20% of all NEC cases across the centers (Caplan 2001; Holman 1997). Approximately 27 ‐ 63% of affected infants require surgical interventions (Lee 2003). Strictures, primarily in the colon, occur in more than one third of affected infants (Ricketts 1994). Increased rate of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) related complications, and extended hospitalization has been reported (Bisquera 2002). Recent data out of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network (NICHD) suggests an increase in neurodevelopmental impairment rates among infants with NEC and sepsis (Stoll 2004).

The pathogenesis of NEC remains incompletely understood, it most likely represents a complex interaction of factors causing mucosal injury and infants subsequent response (Neu 1996). It is speculated that NEC occurs with the coincidence of two of the three pathologic events; intestinal ischemia, colonization by pathologic bacteria, and excess protein substrate in the intestinal lumen (Kosloske 1984; La Gamma 1994). An animal model for NEC has demonstrated the need of bacterial colonization in the development of NEC (Kosloske 1990, Musemeche 1986). VLBW infants at risk of NEC have an aberrant fecal colonization when compared to term infants. They demonstrate a paucity of normal enteric bacterial species and delayed onset of colonization when compared to term infants (Goldmann 1978; Gewolb 1999).

Nosocomial infections are frequent complication among VLBW infants. Data of the NICHD Network demonstrated that as many as 25% of these infants have at least one or more positive blood cultures, and 5% have positive cerebrospinal fluid cultures over the course of their neonatal hospitalization (Stoll 1996). Late onset sepsis is associated with an increased risk of death, neonatal morbidities and prolonged hospitalization (Stoll 2002a; Stoll 2002b).

Probiotic bacteria are live microbial supplements that colonize the gut and provide benefit to the host (Millar 2003). The most frequently used probiotics are lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. There is an increasing interest in the potential health benefits of proactive colonization of the gastrointestinal tract of preterm infants (Millar 2003). Potential mechanisms by which probiotics may protect high risk infants from developing NEC and/or sepsis include; increased barrier to translocation bacteria and their products across the mucosa (Orrhage 1999; Mattar 2001), competitive exclusion of potential pathogens (Reid 2001), modification of host response to microbial products (Duffy 2000), augment IGA mucosal responses, enhancing enteral nutrition that inhibit the growth of pathogens, and up‐regulation of immune responses (Link‐Amster 1994). Although data on probiotics have universally suggested safety, there is a theoretical risk of bacteremia secondary to enterally administered probiotics strains. Bacillus species administered as probiotics, were reported to be associated with invasive disease in target populations (Richard 1988).

Objectives

The primary objective is to identify and summarize the evidence from randomized controlled trials that compared the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic enteral probiotics administration versus placebo or no treatment in the prevention of severe (stage II or more) NEC and/or sepsis preterm infants. The secondary objective is to conduct a subgroup analysis to investigate the effect of probiotics in Extreme Low Birth Weight (ELBW < 1000 gm) infants.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Only randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled trials will be included.

Types of participants

Preterm infants < 37 weeks and/or birth weight < 2500 gm.

Types of interventions

Enteral administration of any live microbial supplement (probiotics) at any dose for more than seven days compared to placebo or no treatment.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcomes

  • Severe NEC (stage II or more) as per Bell's criteria (Bell 1978; Walsh 1986), diagnosed prior to discharge.

  • Nosocomial sepsis, defined as positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures taken beyond 5 days of age.

Secondary outcomes

  • All cause neonatal mortality

  • Any NEC (according Bell's criteria)

  • The composite of nosocomial sepsis or NEC or death

  • Systemic infection with the supplemented organism

  • Duration of total parenteral nutrition (days)

  • Time to establish full enteral feeds (days)

  • Duration of hospitalization (days)

  • Neurodevelopmental impairment i.e. rates of cerebral palsy , cognitive delay, deafness, blindness or their composite reported at 18 months corrected age or later.

  • all other outcomes reported in the included trials will be considered as secondary outcomes in the review.

Search methods for identification of studies

The standard search strategy for the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group will be used. Randomized and quasi‐randomized controlled trials that compared enteral probiotics to placebo or no treatment in premature infants will be identified from OVID MEDLINE‐National Library of Medicine (1966 to present) using the following subject headings (MeSH) and text word terms: "neonate(s), newborn(s), infant(s), probiotics, lactobacillus, bifidobactrium, saccharomyces and publication type 'controlled trial'. No language restrictions will be applied.

Other databases will be searched including: EMBASE (1980 to present), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2004). Two reviewers will perform the electronic database search independently. A manual search of the abstract books published from the Society of Pediatric Research (SPR) and the European Society of Pediatric Research (ESPR) for the period of 1998 ‐ 2004 will be performed. Additional citations will be sought using references in articles retrieved from searches. Subject experts will be contacted to identify the unpublished and ongoing studies. Authors of the published trials will be contacted to clarify or provide additional information. Two reviewers independently will screen candidate articles to check the eligibility for inclusion in the review.

Data collection and analysis

Study Quality and Data extraction
Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Group will be used to assess the methodological quality (validity criteria) of the trials. For each trial, information will be sought regarding the method of randomization, blinding and reporting of all outcomes of all the infants enrolled in the trial. Each criteria will be assessed as yes, no, can't tell. Retrieved articles will be assessed for eligibility and data abstracted independently by two reviewers. Discrepancies will be resolved by discussion and consensus. Where data are incomplete the primary investigator will be contacted for further information and clarifications.

Data Analysis
For dichotomous outcomes, relative risk (RR) and its associated confidence interval will be calculated. For continuous outcomes, treatment effect will be expressed as mean difference and its calculated standard deviation. If appropriate, meta‐analysis of pooled data will be performed assuming a fixed effect model. Review Manager 4.2.7 software will be used for statistical analysis. A subgroup analysis will be carried out to investigate the effect of probiotics in Extreme Low Birth Weight (ELBW < 1000 gm). A sensitivity analysis will be carried out to assess the effect of trials methodological quality on results of the meta‐analysis.

Heterogeneity will be defined as a significant test of heterogeneity (p < 0.1) and differences in the treatment effects across studies. Tests for between‐study heterogeneity (including the I squared test) will be applied to assess the appropriateness of combining studies. We hypothesize that heterogeneity may be due to differences in the type or dose of probiotics used, population under study (VLBW vs., ELBW infants), and study quality.