Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Protocol - Intervention

Dietary supplements for established atopic eczema

This is not the most recent version

Collapse all Expand all

Abstract

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows:

To evaluate dietary supplements for treating established atopic eczema/ dermatitis.

Background

Description of the condition

Disease definition

Atopic eczema (AE) is a non‐infective chronic inflammatory skin disease characterised by an itchy red rash. The terms 'atopic eczema' and 'atopic dermatitis' have been used synonymously. 'Atopy' is defined as "a form of allergy in which there is a hereditary or constitutional tendency to develop hypersensitivity reactions". However up to 40% of children with atopic eczema are not atopic, when defined according to allergy tests such as skin prick tests (Bohme 2001). Others have found that up to two thirds of people with atopic dermatitis are not atopic (Flohr 2004), implying that continued use of the term 'atopic dermatitis' is problematic. A revised nomenclature for allergy (Johansson 2001) has been updated by the World Allergy Organisation (Johansson 2004). The new nomenclature is based on the mechanisms that initiate and mediate allergic reactions. The term 'eczema' is proposed to replace the provisional term 'atopic eczema/ dermatitis syndrome' (AEDS). What is generally known as 'atopic eczema/ dermatitis' is probably not one single disease but rather an aggregation of several diseases with certain characteristics in common. The term 'atopy' can not be used until an IgE sensitisation has been documented by IgE antibodies in the blood of a person or by a positive skin prick test to common environmental allergens such as pollen or house dust mite. The term 'eczema' can therefore be split into 'atopic eczema' and 'non‐atopic eczema'.

Epidemiology and causes

Atopic eczema is the most common inflammatory skin disease of childhood affecting 15 to 20% of children in the UK at any one time (Hoare 2000). Two‐thirds of people with the condition have a family history of atopic eczema, asthma or hay fever. The cumulative prevalence of atopic dermatitis varies from 20% in Northern Europe and the USA to 5% in the south‐eastern Mediterranean (Thestrup 2002). Prevalence data for the symptoms of atopic eczema were collected in the global ISAAC study (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood). The results of this study suggest that atopic eczema is a worldwide problem affecting 5 to 20% of children (Williams 1999). Only 2% of children under the age of five years have severe disease and 84% have mild disease (Emerson 1998). Around 2% of adults have atopic eczema and many of these have a more chronic and severe form (Charman 2002). Atopic eczema is often associated with other atopic diseases (Beck 2000) e.g. asthma and rhinitis and sufferers often have a family history of the condition. The incidence of common allergic disease has increased in the past 30 years (Fendrick 2001). The increase in prevalence of atopic disease in the past three decades appears to be a real phenomenon and has been observed in countries as far apart as Japan, USA, Finland and Africa (Williams 1992).

The cause of eczema is not well understood and probably is due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors (Cookson 2002). In recent years research has pointed to the possible role of environmental agents such as house dust mite (Van Bever 2002), pollution (Polosa 2001), and prenatal or early exposure to infections (Kalliomaki 2002).

Clinical features

Atopic eczema may be acute (short and severe) with redness, scaling, oozing and vesicles, or it may be chronic (long‐term) with skin thickening, altered pigmentation and exaggerated surface markings. The condition affects mainly the creases of the elbows and knees, and the face and neck, although it can affect any part of the body. The severity of eczema is variable, ranging from localised mild scaling to generalised involvement of the whole body, with redness, oozing and secondary infection. Itching is the predominant symptom which can induce a vicious cycle of scratching, leading to skin damage which in turn leads to more itching ‐ the so called "itch scratch itch" cycle. There is a tendency to a dry sensitive skin, even in those who have 'grown out' of the disease. This is thought to be due to a defect in the lipid barrier of the epidermis. In adulthood, the skin (especially of the hands) may be prone to inflammation in the presence of environmental irritants such as soaps (Archer 2000).

Natural history

Atopic eczema usually starts within the first six months of life, and by one year, 60% of those likely to develop it will have done so. Remission occurs by the age of 15 years in 60 to 70% of cases, although some relapse later. In the more severely affected child, development and puberty may be delayed (Baum 2002).

Impact

Atopic eczema varies in severity, often from one hour to the next. Severity can be measured in a number of ways. A systematic review of named outcome scales for atopic eczema found that of the 13 named scales in current use, only one (Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis, SCORAD) had been fully tested for validity, repeatability and responsiveness (Charman a 2000). The itching and scratching can adversely affect quality of life through chronic sleep disturbance. This may have an impact on family life. The disease can be associated with complications such as bacterial and viral infections (McHenry 1995). The unsightly appearance of the skin and the need to apply greasy ointments can limit a child's inclination to participate in social and sporting activities and thus affect their confidence. Adults with atopic eczema often have low self‐esteem and relationships can be difficult to initiate and sustain. Everyday tasks such as housework, gardening, childcare and food preparation present problems when the skin on the hands is cracked. Promotion at work may be blocked for people who do not 'look good'.

There is a substantial economic cost not only to the family of the person with atopic eczema (Kemp 2003) but also to the health services of the country as a whole (Herd 1996; Verboom 2002). Direct costs to the family are encountered when purchasing treatments, special clothing and bedding; indirect costs are experienced from lost working days when parents are looking after a sick child. The wider economic implications lie in the costs of health professionals, the lost opportunities of parents of sick children who do not have the option of seeking employment and the child who, as a result of missing schooling, has limited employment prospects (Su 1997).

Description of the intervention

There is currently no cure for atopic eczema. However a wide range of treatments are employed which aim to control the symptoms (Fennessy 2000; Hoare 2000; Lamb 2002 ). Health professionals assist people in the management of their disease using a variety of treatment methods; these include emollients, topical steroids, topical tars, topical tacrolimus and pimecrolimus. Others such as wet wrap dressings, phototherapy and complementary therapies (Ernst 2000) are also tried. Many of the treatments are of unknown effectiveness (Hoare 2000). Emollients and topical corticosteroids are universally recommended (Smethurst 2002).

Diet and atopic eczema

Many people with atopic eczema are reluctant to use the most commonly recommended treatments because they fear the long‐term health effects (Charman 2000). As a result, many turn to dietary supplementation as a possible treatment approach, often with the belief that some essential ingredient is 'missing' in the diet of the affected individual. A number of dietary supplements have been tried, and these can be broadly classified into:

(1) Vitamins such as pyridoxine (vitamin B6).

Pyridoxine (vitamin B 6) is an essential water‐soluble vitamin and is a co‐factor in many of the body's chemical pathways and has been used to treat atopic eczema (Mabin 1995).

(2) Essential fatty acids such as evening primrose oil (EPO).

Polyunsaturated fatty acids are essential components of all cell membranes. There are two families of such essential fatty acids: n‐6 (e.g. linoleic acid and arachidonic acid) and n‐3 (e.g. eicosapentanoic acid). Some of these substances are precursors of a group of substances called eicosanoids, which may play an important part in the inflammatory and immunological processes of atopic eczema. Fish oils are particularly rich in n‐3 fatty acids, and it has been suggested that these may compete with n‐6 fatty acids in a way that might reduce the inflammatory components of atopic eczema.

(3) Minerals (such as zinc).

Oral supplements of zinc salts have become popular remedies for a range of unrelated medical disorders (Pfeiffer 1978). They have been specifically recommended for the treatment of atopic eczema (Bland 1983; Davies 1987; Franklin 1988), although the scientific basis for this is unclear.

(4) 'Others' such as trace elements (e.g. selenium).

Reduced concentrations of selenium in whole blood, plasma and white cells, and reduced activity of the selenium‐dependent enzyme, glutathione peroxidase in red cells have been found in atopic eczema. This has lead to the use of supplements such as selenium and vitamin E (Fairris 1989)

Why it is important to do this review

The National Health Service Technology Assessment (HTA) systematic review of treatments for atopic eczema (Hoare 2000) looked at trials that had been conducted on dietary interventions including borage oil, evening primrose oil, pyridoxine, vitamin and zinc supplementation. This review suggested that there was no clear benefit over placebo with any of these interventions, although no formal meta‐analyses were performed, and the review is now out of date.

Therefore the rationale for a review on dietary supplements for established atopic eczema is:

(1) dietary supplementation is commonly tried and

(2) no systematic review has focused solely on this large and potentially complex area.

Objectives

To evaluate dietary supplements for treating established atopic eczema/ dermatitis.

Methods

Criteria for considering studies for this review

Types of studies

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of dietary supplements for the treatment of established atopic eczema/dermatitis.
Excluded: double blind placebo controlled food challenges used as diagnostic provocation tests that are not part of a therapeutic trial.

Types of participants

People who have atopic eczema as diagnosed by a doctor.

In the (HTA) systematic review of treatments for atopic eczema (Hoare 2000), specific terms were used to identify trial participants as listed in Table 1. The list classifies conditions into 'definite', 'possible' and 'not' atopic eczema and we shall use this list as a guide.

Open in table viewer
Table 1. Terms used to categorise trial participants with atopic eczema (AE)

Definite AE

Possible AE

Not AE

Atopic eczema

Periorbital eczema

Seborrheic eczema

Atopic dermatitis

Childhood eczema

Contact eczema

Besnier's prurigo

Infantile eczema

Allergic contact eczema

Neurodermatitis atopica (German)

'Eczema' unspecified

Irritant contact eczema

Flexural eczema/ dermatitis

Constitutional eczema

Discoid/ nummular eczema

Endogenous eczema

Asteatotic eczema

Chronic eczema

Varicose/ stasis eczema

Neurodermatitis

Photo‐/ light‐sensitive eczema

Neurodermatitis (German)

Chronic actinic dermatitis

Dishydrotic eczema

Pompholyx eczema

Hand eczema

Frictional lichenoid dermatitis

Lichen simplex

Occupational dermatitis

Prurigo

Those studies using terms in the 'not atopic eczema' category such as 'allergic contact eczema' will be excluded. Those studies using terms in the 'possible atopic eczema' category, such as 'childhood eczema' will be scrutinised by one or more authors and only included if the description of the participants clearly indicated atopic eczema (i.e. itching and flexural involvement).

Types of interventions

Dietary supplements such as fish oils, vitamins, and zinc. Evening primrose oil (EPO) and borage oil are excluded in this review as they are being covered in a separate Cochrane Review (Schmidt 2004). Probiotics are also being covered in a separate Cochrane review. The comparators will be no treatment, placebo or any other active intervention.

Types of outcome measures

Primary outcome measures

(a) Short‐term (within six weeks). Changes in participant‐rated or mother‐rated symptoms of atopic eczema such as itching (pruritus) or sleep loss.
(b) Degree of long‐term (over six months) control such as reduction in number of flares or reduced need for other treatments.

Secondary outcome measures

(a) Global severity as rated by the participants or their physician.
If this outcome is not available then the following will be used:
(b) Global changes in composite rating scales using a published named scale.
Where this is not possible, we shall use:
(c) The author's modification of existing scales or new scales.
Also:
(d) Quality of life (Chren 1997; Finlay 1996).
(e) Palatability.
(f) Adverse events including long‐term consequences on growth.

Tertiary outcome measures

Changes in individual signs of atopic eczema as assessed by a physician e.g. erythema (redness), purulence (pus formation), excoriation (scratch marks), xerosis (skin dryness), lichenification (thickening of the skin), fissuring (cracks), exudation (weeping serum from the skin surface), pustules (pus spots), papules (spots that protrude from the skin surface), vesicles (clear fluid or 'water blisters' in the skin), crusts (dried serum on skin surface), infiltration/oedema (swelling of the skin), induration (a thickened feel to the skin).

Search methods for identification of studies

Electronic searches

Relevant trials will be identified from:

  • the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register which contains the results of a comprehensive programme of ongoing hand searching of dermatological journals and conference proceedings, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (last update);;

  • MEDLINE (from 2002) see Appendix 1, EMBASE (from 2002);

  • LILACS, PsycInfo, AMED, ISI Web of Science (which contains the Science Citation Index).

Searching other resources

Reference from published studies

The bibliographies will be scanned for possible references to RCTs.

Unpublished literature

Unpublished, ongoing trials will be obtained via correspondence with trial authors. The metaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled‐trials.com), which contains the UK NHS National Research Register, will be searched for ongoing trials.

Pharmaceutical companies

Pharmaceutical companies will be contacted where appropriate for reviews or unpublished trials.

Language

No language restrictions will be imposed and translations will be sought where necessary.

Data collection and analysis

Study selection

Titles and abstracts of trials identified from the searches will be checked by two authors (FB and FD). The full text of all RCTs of possible relevance will be independently assessed by three authors (FB, HW and FD). The authors will decide which of the trials fit the inclusion criteria and a record of their methodological quality will be made. Any disagreements will be resolved by discussion between the authors. Where there are missing data from the trials attempts will be made to obtain the data by contacting the author.

Assessment of methodological quality

The quality assessment will include an evaluation of the following components for each included study, since there is some evidence that these are associated with biased estimates of treatment effect (Juni 2001):

(a) the method of generation of the randomisation sequence;
(b) the method of allocation concealment ‐ it will be considered 'adequate' if the assignment cannot be for seen;
(c) who was blinded/not blinded (participants, clinicians, outcome assessors);
(d) how many participants were lost to follow up in each arm, and whether participants were analysed in the groups to which they were originally randomised (intention to treat).

In addition the quality assessment will also include:

(e) the degree of certainty that the participants had atopic eczema;
(f) the baseline comparability of the participants for age, sex and eczema severity;
(g) assessment of compliance with treatment.

The information will be recorded in a table of quality criteria and a description of the quality of each study will be given based on a summary of these components.

Data extraction

This will be performed independently by two authors (FB and FD) using a data extraction form for consistency. Discrepancies will be resolved by discussion. Data will be entered into software by FB.

Analysis

For studies with a similar type of intervention a meta‐analysis will be performed, to calculate a weighted treatment effect across trials, using a random effects model. The results will be expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean differences (WMD and 95% CI) for continuous outcomes. The result will also be expressed as number needed to treat (NNT) where appropriate, for a range of plausible control event rates. Where it is not possible to perform a meta‐analysis the data will be summarised for each trial.

Heterogeneity will be assessed using I2. If substantial heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) exists between studies, for the primary outcome, reasons for heterogeneity, such as disease severity, dosage etc will be explored.

Further subgroup analysis will be performed where adequate information is given, for infants (under one year old) and children (aged 1 to 16 year(s) versus adults. Sensitivity analyses may also be conducted to examine the effects of excluding poor quality studies, defined as those studies that do not clearly report the randomisation process, blinding and no intention to treat.

Where patient rated‐symptoms are reported on categorical Likert scales e.g. no improvement, mild improvement, good improvement, excellent, we will dichotomise the data by defining a cut‐off at 'good to excellent improvement'. Where data is reported on continuous scales e.g. number of days sleep loss, we will regard a 20% reduction/improvement compared to control as being clinically significant. If enough studies use SCORAD then we will split eczema severity into mild, moderate and severe where mild is 0 to15, moderate is 15 to 40 and severe is > 40.

Where data on existing medication usage is included we will attempt to see whether this has increased differentially in one of the treatment arms as the main dietary intervention has proceeded.

Cross‐over trials will be analysed using techniques appropriate for paired designs, with the help of a statistician. Data from parallel trials and the first phase of the cross‐over trials will be analysed as separate subgroups before pooling, since cross‐over studies may not be appropriate for dietary supplements. Non‐randomised controlled studies will be listed but not discussed further. Studies relating to adverse effects will be described qualitatively.

Other

Where there is uncertainty, authors will be contacted for clarification. A consumer co‐author is part of the review team and her help will be focused particularly on the readability and clarity of the final review.

Table 1. Terms used to categorise trial participants with atopic eczema (AE)

Definite AE

Possible AE

Not AE

Atopic eczema

Periorbital eczema

Seborrheic eczema

Atopic dermatitis

Childhood eczema

Contact eczema

Besnier's prurigo

Infantile eczema

Allergic contact eczema

Neurodermatitis atopica (German)

'Eczema' unspecified

Irritant contact eczema

Flexural eczema/ dermatitis

Constitutional eczema

Discoid/ nummular eczema

Endogenous eczema

Asteatotic eczema

Chronic eczema

Varicose/ stasis eczema

Neurodermatitis

Photo‐/ light‐sensitive eczema

Neurodermatitis (German)

Chronic actinic dermatitis

Dishydrotic eczema

Pompholyx eczema

Hand eczema

Frictional lichenoid dermatitis

Lichen simplex

Occupational dermatitis

Prurigo

Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Terms used to categorise trial participants with atopic eczema (AE)