Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Automonitorización de la glucemia en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 que no utilizan insulina

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005060.pub3Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 18 enero 2012see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Trastornos metabólicos y endocrinos

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Uriëll L Malanda

    Correspondencia a: Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

  • Laura MC Welschen

    Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Ingrid I Riphagen

    Unit for Applied Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

  • Jacqueline M Dekker

    Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Giel Nijpels

    Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Sandra DM Bot

    Department of General Practice, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributions of authors

URIËLL MALANDA: wrote the draft of this review that was commented on and discussed by LAURA WELSCHEN, INGRID RIPHAGEN, GIEL NIJPELS, JACQUELINE DEKKER and SANDRA BOT.

INGRID RIPHAGEN: performed the searches.

URIËLL MALANDA and LAURA WELSCHEN: independently inspected the titles and abstracts of the references identified to evaluate their potential eligibility.

URIËLL MALANDA and LAURA WELSCHEN: independently assessed the risk of bias of the relevant trials and performed data extraction and data entry.

URIËLL MALANDA, LAURA WELSCHEN, INGRID RIPHAGEN, JACQUELINE DEKKER, GIEL NIJPELS and SANDRA BOT: interpreted the findings and helped writing the final manuscript.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Netherlands.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

URIËLL MALANDA, JACQUELINE DEKKER, GIEL NIJPELS and SANDRA BOT all take part in an ongoing study on the topic of interest of this review.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Alfonso Calle‐Pascual (St Carlos Study), Andrew Farmer (DiGEM trial), Nanne Kleefstra (ZODIAC study), Antonio Nicolucci (ROSES study) and Maurice O'Kane (ESMON study) for providing additional and unpublished data of their trials. Raymond Ostelo and Henrica de Vet are thanked for their help with designing the meta‐analysis.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Jan 18

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin

Review

Uriëll L Malanda, Laura MC Welschen, Ingrid I Riphagen, Jacqueline M Dekker, Giel Nijpels, Sandra DM Bot

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005060.pub3

2005 Apr 20

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin

Review

Laura MC Welschen, Evelien Bloemendal, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M Dekker, Robert J Heine, Wim AB Stalman, Lex M Bouter

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005060.pub2

2004 Oct 18

Self‐monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin

Protocol

Laura MC Welschen, Evelien Bloemendal, Giel Nijpels, Jacqueline M Dekker, Robert J Heine, Wim AB Stalman, Lex M Bouter

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005060

Differences between protocol and review

This section relates to the differences between the first review (Welschen 2005a) and the present review‐update (Malanda 2011).

  1. Four authors have left the team and three others have joined.

  2. Because HbA1c reflects a more constant view of glycaemic control over time, we believe that  changes in fasting plasma glucose are of less value for assessing the effect of self‐monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). We therefore assessed effects on fasting plasma glucose level as a secondary outcome whereas this was a primary outcome in the first review.

  3. We have added PsycInfo to our search strategy because studies investigating the effect of SMBG on quality of life or well‐being might not be published in regular medical databases.

  4. The mandatory Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool has replaced the Amsterdam‐Maastricht list.

  5. Review has been updated with six new trials (Barnett 2008; DiGEM trial 2007; Durán 2010; Franciosi 2011; Kleefstra 2010; O'Kane 2008).

  6. Addition of six new studies made it possible to perform pooled random‐effects subgroup analyses on the basis of diabetes duration and follow‐up.

  7. Conclusions could be drawn on the effect of SMBG on glycaemic control for subgroups and for patient satisfaction, general well‐being or general health‐related quality of life.

  8. Conclusions have been changed