Terapias de masajes para el cólico infantil
Información
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004796.pub2Copiar DOI
- Base de datos:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Versión publicada:
-
- 12 diciembre 2012see what's new
- Tipo:
-
- Intervention
- Etapa:
-
- Review
- Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
-
Grupo Cochrane de Problemas de desarrollo, psicosociales y de aprendizaje
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2012 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cifras del artículo
Altmetric:
Citado por:
Autores
Contributions of authors
This review was originally conceived by Sarah Sampler, who co‐authored the original protocol with PL ‐ although she took no part in the production of this review.
DD and PL completed the design for the review and published the updated protocol.
DD co‐ordinated the efforts of the authors, organised retrieval of papers, wrote to authors for additional information.
The review authors (AV, PL, GL, JM and DD) reviewed citations, extracted information and participated in discussions concerning eligibility, risks, etc. DD co‐ordinated both allocation/analysis of the data and preparation of the manuscript.
PP provided statistical advice.
All review authors assisted with the interpretation of the data and participated in review of the manuscript.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
No sources of support supplied
External sources
-
College of Chiropractors, UK.
Dawn Dobson has completed this review as part of a PhD, for which funding contributions have been received from the College of Chiropractors.
-
McTimoney Chiropractic Association, UK.
Dawn Dobson has completed this review as part of a PhD, for which funding contributions have been received from the McTimoney Chiropractic Association.
-
McTimoney College of Chiropractic, UK.
Dawn Dobson has completed this review as part of a PhD, for which funding contributions are promised from the McTimoney College of Chiropractic.
-
Rufford Maurice Laing foundation, UK.
Prof George Lewith’s post is supported by the Rufford Maurice Laing foundation.
Declarations of interest
Dawn Dobson ‐ financial support has been provided by the College of Chiropractors and the McTimoney Chiropractic Association for a PhD, of which this review forms a part. Neither institution has sought to influence this review in any way.
Peter LBJ Lucassen ‐ none known
Joyce J Miller ‐ teacher at Anglo‐European College of Chiropractic and lead tutor of MSc in Musculoskeletal Health of Paediatrics validated by Bournemouth University. She has authored or co‐authored nine articles on the topic of excessive infant crying or infant colic and co‐authored a research article (Miller 2010) that was included in this review (although she did not participate in its selection or assessment).
Arine M Vlieger ‐ none known.
Philip Prescott ‐ none known.
George Lewith ‐ none known.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to
-
Margaret Anderson of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group for invaluable assistance with refining the search strategy.
-
Professor Geraldine Macdonald, Co‐ordinating Editor of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group, for assistance with preparing the manuscript.
-
Laura MacDonald, Managing Editor of the Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group, for support and guidance throughout the process.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2012 Dec 12 | Manipulative therapies for infantile colic | Review | Dawn Dobson, Peter LBJ Lucassen, Joyce J Miller, Arine M Vlieger, Philip Prescott, George Lewith | |
| 2003 Oct 20 | Manipulative therapy for infantile colic | Protocol | Dawn Dobson, Peter LBJ Lucassen, Sarah Sampler | |
Differences between protocol and review
The background section has been re‐written in parts. In particular, it now contains a section on adverse events that was not included in the protocol as we felt we had not adequately addressed this question.
The analysis was undertaken in accordance with the protocol, as described in this manuscript, with two differences:
-
we incorporated an additional outcome measure (clinically significant reduction in crying time). While change in daily hours of crying had been anticipated in the protocol, we had not considered the change might be measured as a dichotomous outcome;
-
we presented the results as ORs rather than RRs for dichotomous variables as we thought this was more appropriate when reporting improvements in symptoms.
