Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Consumidores y comunicación

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Elizabeth Murray

    Correspondencia a: Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London, UK

    [email protected]

  • Joanne Burns

    Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London, UK

  • Sharon See Tai

    Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London, UK

  • Rosalind Lai

    NLH Primary Care Q & A Service, Aberystwyth, UK

  • Irwin Nazareth

    Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, London, UK

Contributions of authors

EM: conceived, designed and co‐ordinated the review. Obtained funding. Oversaw collection, management, analysis and interpretation of data. Wrote first and final drafts of review. Contributed to steering group decisions.
JB: screened search results, retrieved papers, screened papers, appraised papers, commented on drafts of review. Contributed to steering group decisions.
IN: designed review and analytical strategy, interpreted data, commented on drafts of review. Contributed to steering group decisions.
RL: developed search strategy, undertook searches, amended strategy for different databases. Contributed to steering group decisions.
SST: designed analytical strategy, extracted and synthesised data. Contributed to steering group decisions.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University College London, UK.

External sources

  • Department of Health, UK.

Declarations of interest

Two authors of the review (EM and IN) have submitted a grant application with David Gustafson and the CHESS team for a randomised controlled trial of CHESS for Coronary Heart Disease in the UK.

Acknowledgements

Charles Gore, Chief Executive of the Hepatitis C UK Trust for his perceptive inputs from a consumer perspective. Megan Prictor and Sophie Hill, of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group ‐ for their support and comments on the design and co‐ordination of the review. Sandy Oliver, Editor, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group ‐ for coordinating the editorial and peer‐reviewers' comments. Per Egil Kummervold, Per Hjortdal and Martin Jenssen for noticing the error in direction of change for the clinical outcomes in the original version of this review, and bringing this error to our attention. The entire Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, Nick Royle, Chief Executive of the Cochrane Collaboration and Mike Clarke, Director of UK Cochrane Centre for their ongoing help and support after identification of the errors in the original review, and assistance with addressing these errors and their consequences. Two independent Cochrane statisticians for their thorough critique of the revised review. Richard Morris, Reader in Medical Statistics and Epidemiology in the Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences at University College London for acting as our internal independent statistical reviewer after the detection of the errors, and for advice on revising the analyses. The first version of the review was assessed by four editors of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, and four external referees, including one consumer referee. The revised version was assessed by five editors of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group, a content expert, a consumer referee and two statisticians.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2005 Oct 19

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Review

Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Rosalind Lai, Irwin Nazareth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4

2004 Oct 18

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Review

Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Rosalind Lai, Irwin Nazareth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub2

2004 Oct 18

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Review

Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Rosalind Lai, Irwin Nazareth

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub3

2003 Apr 22

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Protocol

Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, S See‐Tai, Rosalind Lai, Irwin Nazareth, Sharon See Tai

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004274

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.