Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Esta versión no es la más reciente

ver la versión actual 15 agosto 2018

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 19 octubre 2005see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:

  1. Grupo Cochrane de Accidentes cerebrovasculares

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2009 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Irene van der Schaaf

    Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Ale Algra

    Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Marieke Wermer

    Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Andrew Molyneux

    Neurovascular Research Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK

  • Mike J Clarke

    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK

  • Jan van Gijn

    Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Gabriel JE Rinkel

    Correspondencia a: Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

    [email protected]

Contributions of authors

IC van der Schaaf: extracted data from the studies included in the review; prepared the analysis and has written the first drafts of the review.
A Algra: participated in writing the grant application; developing the protocol; appraising the quality of studies; data analysis; data interpretation and writing the review.
MJH Wermer: extracted data from the studies included in the review and participated in writing the review.
A Molyneux: gave comments on the protocol and participated in data interpretation and writing the review.
M Clarke: helped editing the text of the review and has written the synopsis.
J van Gijn: participated in writing the grant application; developing the protocol; appraising the quality of studies; data interpretation and writing the review.
GJE Rinkel: participated in developing the protocol; data extraction; appraising the quality of studies; data analysis; data interpretation; writing the review and entering the review into RevMan. Dr Rinkel is the guarantor for this review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • NHS Research and Development Programme, UK Cochrane Centre, UK.

External sources

  • Netherlands Heartfoundation, Netherlands.

Declarations of interest

disponible en

Dr A Molyneux acts as a medical advisor to the Micrus Corporation, a company which manufactures detachable coils. He also has a stock interest in this company. Dr M Clarke is on the Executive Committee for the ISAT trial.

Acknowledgements

disponible en

We thank Drs EH Brilstra and WJJ van Rooij for their contributions to the development of the protocol for this review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2018 Aug 15

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Review

Antti Lindgren, Mervyn DI Vergouwen, Irene van der Schaaf, Ale Algra, Marieke Wermer, Mike J Clarke, Gabriel JE Rinkel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub3

2005 Oct 19

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Review

Irene van der Schaaf, Ale Algra, Marieke Wermer, Andrew Molyneux, Mike J Clarke, Jan van Gijn, Gabriel JE Rinkel

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085.pub2

2001 Jan 22

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Protocol

Ale Algra, Eva Brilstra, Mike Clarke, Jan van Gijn, Andrew Molyneux, Gabriel JE Rinkel, WJJ van Rooij

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003085

PICO

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

El uso y la enseñanza del modelo PICO están muy extendidos en el ámbito de la atención sanitaria basada en la evidencia para formular preguntas y estrategias de búsqueda y para caracterizar estudios o metanálisis clínicos. PICO son las siglas en inglés de cuatro posibles componentes de una pregunta de investigación: paciente, población o problema; intervención; comparación; desenlace (outcome).

Para saber más sobre el uso del modelo PICO, puede consultar el Manual Cochrane.