Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychoeducation for schizophrenia

Información

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002831.pub2Copiar DOI
Base de datos:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Versión publicada:
  1. 15 junio 2011see what's new
Tipo:
  1. Intervention
Etapa:
  1. Review
Grupo Editorial Cochrane:
  1. Grupo Cochrane de Esquizofrenia

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cifras del artículo

Altmetric:

Citado por:

Citado 0 veces por enlace Crossref Cited-by

Contraer

Autores

  • Jun Xia

    Correspondencia a: Cochrane Schizophrenia Group, The University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

  • Lars Bertil Merinder

    Dept of Psychiatric Demography, Institute of Basic Psychiatric Research, University Hospital of Aarhus, Risskov, Denmark

  • Madhvi R Belgamwar

    Radbourne Unit, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK

Contributions of authors

1. Original review
Eila Pekkala ‐ initiation of the review, protocol production, searching, data extraction, analysis, data interpretation and writing the final report.
Lars Bertil Merinder ‐ protocol production, analysis, data interpretation and writing the final report of the original review.

2. 2010 update
Jun Xia ‐ selected studies, extracted data and wrote up report during the 2010 update.
Madhvi R Belgamwa ‐ extracted and input English trial data during 2010 update.
Lars Bertil Merinder ‐ extracted data of English trials and handled all queries relating to trials from the original review.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Department of Psychiatry, Porvoo Hospital, Finland.

  • Department of Psychiatric Demography, Institute of Basic Psychiatric Research, University Hospital of Aarhus, Denmark.

External sources

  • Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment (FinOHTA), Finland.

Declarations of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

For the original version of this review, comments on all aspects of the review by Kristian Wahlbeck have been greatly appreciated. The authors wish to thank Eila Sailas for her help in the selection of trials and in double‐checking data extraction. Thanks go to Anne Vainikka, Kristiina Holmberg and Asko J Huotarinen at the Central Library of Health Sciences Terkko, Helsinki, Finland, who uncomplainingly dealt with our requests for articles. Thanks to Stina Blomberg and Siv Laxén, who have been helpful in translating articles in Spanish and Ulla Wang in translating a Chinese study. The review authors sent several letters to authors of studies, asking for extra information about their trials. Dr Atkinson, Dr Herz, Dr Hornung, Dr Lesage, Dr Macpherson, Dr Pitschel‐Walz, Professor Tarrier and Dr Youssef were kind enough to respond, for which we are very grateful.

For the 2010 update, the authors would like to thank Samantha Roberts for running the trial search, Clive Adams for editorial input and John Rathbone for practical guidance during the stage of writing up.

The Methods section of this review uses text from the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's generic text for methods sections. This has been written over a period of years to ensure consistency and clarity. We fully acknowledge use of this text which we have adapted for relevance to this particular review.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2011 Jun 15

Psychoeducation for schizophrenia

Review

Jun Xia, Lars Bertil Merinder, Madhvi R Belgamwar

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002831.pub2

2002 Apr 22

Psychoeducation for schizophrenia

Review

Eila Tellervo Pekkala, Lars Bertil Merinder

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002831

Differences between protocol and review

1. Wording of protocol
We have substantively reworded the protocol of this review. We think that this rewording represents an improvement in clarity but, also, that it did not substantively change the procedures by which we undertook the review. For the record the methods section of the previous version of this review is reproduced in Appendix 1.

2. Additional outcomes
Many studies found in the 2010 update search reported data on outcomes such as social function, mental state, adverse event etc, which were not listed in the original protocol. But we feel that these outcome data are of significant clinical value and important to this review. Therefore, we amended the original protocol and added/supplemented the following secondary outcomes: social function, global function, global state, mental state, expressed emotion, quality of life, satisfaction with care and adverse events.

Notes

This review has undergone anonymous external peer review by two experts in the field.