Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of reserpine for primary hypertension

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

available in

Background

Many antihypertensive agents exist today for the treatment of primary hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg). Randomised controlled trials have been carried out to investigate the evidence for these agents.There is, for example, strong RCT evidence that thiazides reduce mortality and morbidity. Reserpine has been used as a second‐line therapy in some of those trials. However, the dose‐related blood pressure reduction with this agent is not known.

Objectives

To investigate the dose‐related effect of reserpine on blood pressure, heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse events.

Search methods

The databases CENTRAL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched. We also traced citations in the reference sections of the retrieved studies.

Selection criteria

Included studies were truly randomised controlled trials comparing reserpine monotherapy to placebo or no treatment in patients with primary hypertension.

Data collection and analysis

Methods of randomization and concealment were assessed. Data on blood pressure reduction, heart rate,and withdrawal due to adverse effects were extracted and analysed.

Main results

Four RCTs (N =237) were found that met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled effect demonstrates a statistically significant systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction in patients taking reserpine compared to placebo (WMD ‐7.92, 95% CI ‐14.05, ‐1.78). Due to significant heterogeneity across trials, a significant effect in diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) could not be found. The SBP effects were achieved with 0.5 mg/day or greater. However, the dose‐response pattern could not be determined because of the small number of trials. Data from the trial that investigated Rauwiloid against placebo was not combined with reserpine data from the remaining three trials. This is because Rauwiloid is a different alkaloid extract of the plant Rauwolfia serpentina and the dose used is not comparable to reserpine. None of the included trials reported withdrawals due to adverse effects.

Authors' conclusions

Reserpine is effective in reducing SBP roughly to the same degree as other first‐line antihypertensive drugs. However, we could not make definite conclusions regarding the dose‐response pattern because of the small number of included trials. More RCTs are needed to assess the effects of reserpine on blood pressure and to determine the dose‐related safety profile before the role of this drug in the treatment of primary hypertension can be established.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

Reserpine, an old and almost forgotten antihypertensive drug, lowers blood pressure

Reserpine, a root extract of the naturally occurring plant Rauwolfia serpentina, was used in the past as first‐line therapy for reducing blood pressure. Nowadays, it is used mainly as a second line agent. This review, which aimed to find and summarize existing evidence from randomised controlled trials, concluded that reserpine is effective in reducing systolic blood pressure as a first‐line agent. The degree of this effect was mild to moderate. Because the four included studies did not investigate a wide range of doses, no data was available to infer a dose‐related response in blood pressure. Insufficient data was available to evaluate the adverse effects of reserpine therapy.