Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Action plans for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

available in

Background

The effectiveness of action plans as treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not known.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of action plans in the management of COPD.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL and the National Research Register of Ongoing Trials. We also searched reference lists of identified studies. The search was completed in August 2004.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials of action plans in COPD. Studies with a primary diagnosis of asthma excluded.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Investigators were contacted for additional information when necessary. Study results were combined in meta‐analyses using the Cochrane Collaboration software RevMan.

Main results

There was evidence of a positive effect of action plans on self‐management knowledge. The mean difference (MD) for recognition of a severe exacerbation was 2.50; 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 3.96, for self‐action in severe exacerbations MD 1.50; 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 2.38 and the use of antibiotics MD 6.00; 95% confidence interval 2.68 to 9.32. There was also evidence of a positive effect on the initiation of antibiotics (odds ratio (OR) 10.16; 95% confidence interval 2.02 to 51.09) and/or oral steroids (OR 6.58; 95% confidence interval 1.29 to 33.62). However, there was no evidence of significant effects on healthcare utilisation, health‐related quality of life, lung function, functional capacity, symptom scores, mortality, anxiety, or depression. No trials used as outcomes: number of exacerbations, length of exacerbations, or days lost from work.

Authors' conclusions

This review shows there is evidence that action plans aid people with COPD in recognising and reacting appropriately to an exacerbation of their symptoms via the self‐initiation of antibiotics or steroids. Further research needs to be completed with more comprehensive outcomes measures in order to ascertain whether this results in significantly decreased morbidity and/or mortality.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Action plans for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive disease characterised by exacerbations of symptoms which decrease quality of life. Action plans are designed to help an individual recognise a deterioration in their symptoms and initiate changes to treatment early. This is designed to reduce the impact of the exacerbation.
This review found that the use of action plans results in an increased ability to recognise and react appropriately to an exacerbation by individuals. Unfortunately there was no evidence these behavioural changes alter health‐care utilisation.