Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Different dosage schedules for reducing cardiotoxicity in cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

Background

The use of anthracycline chemotherapy is limited by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. To prevent this cardiotoxicity, different anthracycline dosage schedules have been studied.

Objectives

To determine the occurrence of cardiotoxicity with the use of different anthracycline dosage schedules (i.e. peak doses and infusion durations) in cancer patients.

Search methods

We searched the databases of The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to November 2008). Also, we searched reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings and ongoing trials databases.

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which different anthracycline dosage schedules were compared in cancer patients (children and adults).

Data collection and analysis

Two authors independently performed the study selection, the risk of bias assessment and the data‐extraction.

Main results

We identified seven RCTs addressing different anthracycline infusion durations. The meta‐analysis showed a statistically significant lower rate of clinical heart failure with an infusion duration of 6 hours or longer as compared to a shorter infusion duration (relative risk (RR) = 0.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.09 to 0.81; 5 studies; 557 patients). The majority of patients included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours. For different anthracycline peak doses we identified two RCTs addressing a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m2 versus 60 mg/m2 or more, one RCT addressing a liposomal doxorubicin peak dose of 25 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2 and one RCT addressing an epirubicin peak dose of 83 mg/m2 versus 110 mg/m2. In none of the studies a significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure was identified. All patients included in these studies were adults with different solid tumours.

Authors' conclusions

An anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or longer reduces the risk of clinical heart failure and it seems to reduce the risk of subclinical cardiac damage. Since there is only a small amount of data for children and data obtained in adults cannot be extrapolated to children, different anthracycline infusion durations should be evaluated further in children.

No significant difference in the occurrence of clinical heart failure was identified in patients treated with a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m2 or 60 mg/m2 or more. For the other identified peak doses only one RCT was available, so no definitive conclusions can be made about the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. More high quality research is needed, both in children and adults and in leukaemias and solid tumours.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

Different dosage schedules for reducing damage to the heart in cancer patients receiving anthracycline chemotherapy.

Anthracyclines are one of the most effective treatments for various types of cancer. Unfortunately, there is a risk of heart damage depending on the total dose a patient has received. In an effort to prevent this heart damage different anthracycline dosage schedules (like different infusion durations or different individual peak doses) are being used.

Based on the currently available evidence, the authors are not able to favour either a doxorubicin peak dose of less than 60 mg/m2 or 60 mg/m2 or more. For the use of other anthracycline peak doses there was not enough high quality evidence available to draw conclusions. For children and individuals with leukaemia no data are available. For the use of different anthracycline infusion durations, the authors found that an anthracycline infusion duration of six hours or longer reduces the risk of clinical heart failure (i.e. patients have symptoms like shortness of breath or oedema in the legs), and it seems to reduce the risk of subclinical heart failure (i.e. heart damage diagnosed with for example echocardiography in patients without symptoms). There is only a small amount of data available for children and individuals with leukaemia; most studies evaluating different anthracycline infusion durations were performed in adults with solid tumours. Further high quality research is needed.