Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution for treating cholera

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

available in

Background

Oral rehydration solution (ORS) is used to treat dehydration caused by diarrheal diseases including cholera. Reduced osmolarity formulations are safe and more effective than standard ORS for treating non‐cholera diarrhea. As cholera causes rapid electrolyte loss, it is important to know if these benefits are similar for people with cholera.

Objectives

To compare the safety and efficacy of reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution (ORS) with standard ORS for treating diarrhea due to cholera.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Disease Group Specialized Register (January 2004), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (1974 to January 2004), and LILACS (1982 to January 2004). We also contacted organizations and searched reference lists.

Selection criteria

Randomized controlled trials comparing reduced osmolarity ORS with standard ORS for treating adults and children with acute diarrhea due to cholera.

Data collection and analysis

Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. We pooled binary data using risk ratios (RR), continuous data using mean difference (MD) or the standardized mean difference (SMD), and presented the results with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Main results

For glucose‐based reduced osmolarity ORS, seven trials (718 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Biochemical hyponatremia (serum sodium < 130 mmol/L) was more common with reduced osmolarity ORS (RR 1.67, CI 1.09 to 2.57; 465 participants, 4 trials); for severe biochemical hyponatremia (serum sodium < 125 mmol/L) this was not significant (RR 1.58, CI 0.62 to 4.04; 465 participants, 4 trials). No trials reported symptomatic hyponatremia or death. We found no statistically significant difference in the need for unscheduled intravenous infusion. Analyses separating children and adults showed no obvious trends.

Two trials also examined rice‐based ORS. In the reduced osmolarity group, duration of diarrhea was shorter (MD ‐16.85 hours, CI ‐21.22 to ‐12.48; 102 participants, 2 trials).

Authors' conclusions

In people with cholera, reduced osmolarity ORS is associated with biochemical hyponatremia when compared with standard ORS, although there are similar benefits in terms of other outcomes. Although this risk does not appear to be accompanied by serious consequences, the total patient experience in existing trials is small. Under wider practice conditions, especially where patient monitoring is difficult, caution is warranted.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

In people with cholera, reduced osmolarity oral rehydration solution (ORS) is associated with low blood salt levels but no life‐threatening clinical effects

Cholera is caused by bacteria ingested through contaminated food or water and is commonly found where sanitation measures are poor. It causes severe diarrhea and vomiting, which can lead to profound dehydration and potentially death. ORS is an effective treatment for diarrhea, but a new ORS with a lower electrolyte content is safe and more effective in people with non‐cholera diarrhea. This review found that this new ORS appears to be as effective as the original formula in people with cholera, but may lead to low blood salt levels. More research is needed to better understand these potential safety issues.