Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Long‐acting beta2‐agonists versus anti‐leukotrienes as add‐on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for chronic asthma

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

Background

Patients who continue to experience asthma symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) represent a management challenge. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) and long‐acting ß2‐agonists (LABA) agents may both be considered as add‐on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS).

Objectives

We compared the efficacy and safety profile of adding either daily LABA or LTRA in asthmatic patients who remained symptomatic on ICS.

Search methods

The Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register was searched for randomised controlled trials up to and including March 2006. Reference lists of all included studies and reviews were screened to identify potentially relevant citations. Inquiries regarding other published or unpublished studies supported by the authors of the included studies or pharmaceutical companies who manufacture these agents were made. Conference proceedings of major respiratory meetings were also searched.

Selection criteria

Only randomised controlled trials conducted in adults or children with recurrent asthma where a LABA (for example, salmeterol or formoterol) or LTRA (for example, montelukast, pranlukast, zafirlukast) was added to ICS for a minimum of 28 days were considered for inclusion. Inhaled short‐acting ß2‐agonists and short courses of oral steroids were permitted as rescue medications. Other daily asthma treatments were permitted, providing the dose remained constant during the intervention period. Two reviewers independently reviewed the literature searches.

Data collection and analysis

Data extraction and trial quality assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. Whenever possible, primary study authors were requested to confirm methodology and data extraction and to provide additional information and clarification when needed. Where necessary, expansion of graphic reproductions and estimation from other data presented in the paper was performed.

Main results

Fifteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; eleven trials including 6,030 participants provided data in sufficient detail to permit aggregation. All eleven trials pertained to adults with moderate airway obstruction (% predicted FEV1 66‐76%) at baseline. Montelukast (n=9) or Zafirlukast (n=2) was compared to Salmeterol (n=9) or Formoterol (n=2) as add‐on therapy to 400‐565 mcg of beclomethasone or equivalent. Risk of exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids was significantly lower with LABA+ICS when compared to LTRA+ICS (RR= 0.83, 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI): 0.71, 0.97): the number needed to treat with LABA compared to LTRA, to prevent one exacerbation over 48 weeks, was 38 (95% CI: 23 to 247).

The following outcomes also improved significantly with the addition of LABA compared to LTRA to inhaled steroids (Weighted Mean Difference; 95%CI): morning PEFR (16 L/min; 13 to 18), evening PEFR (12 L/min; 9 to 15), FEV1 (80 mL; 60 to 100), rescue‐free days (9%; 5% to 13%), symptom‐free days (6%; 2 to 11), rescue β2‐agonists (‐0.5 puffs/day; ‐0.2 to ‐1), quality of life (0.1; 0.05 to 0.2), symptom score (Standard Mean Difference ‐0.2; ‐0.1 to ‐0.3), night awakenings (‐0.1/week; ‐0.06 to ‐0.2) and patient satisfaction (RR 1.12; 1.07 to 1.16). Risk of withdrawals due to any reason was significantly lower with LABA+ICS compared to LTRA+ICS (Risk Ratio 0.83, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.95). Withdrawals due to adverse events or due to poor asthma control, hospitalisation, osteopenia, serious adverse events, overall adverse events, headache or cardiovascular events were not significantly different between the two study groups.

Authors' conclusions

In asthmatic adults inadequately controlled on low doses of inhaled steroids, the addition of LABA is superior to LTRA for preventing exacerbations requiring systemic steroids, and for improving lung function, symptoms, and the use of rescue β2‐agonists.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

What are the effects of long‐acting beta agonists and anti‐leukotrienes when added to inhaled steroids?

People who continue to experience asthma symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids represent a management challenge. It is not clear whether the addition of a long‐acting inhaled bronchodilator (formoterol or salmeterol) would provide any additional benefit when compared to adding a oral anti‐leukotriene agent (zafirlukast or montelukast). This review of eleven good quality randomised controlled trials has shown that the addition of long‐acting bronchodilator provides significantly greater protection against exacerbations, greater improvement in lung function, and modest additional improvement in symptoms, use of rescue medication, quality of life and satisfaction as compared to the use of anti‐leukotrienes. Thirty eight patients, experiencing asthma symptoms despite taking regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), need to be treated for 48 weeks with additional long‐acting bronchodilators rather than with additional anti‐leukotriene agents to prevent one exacerbation.