Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Parent‐training programmes for improving maternal psychosocial health

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

Background

Mental health problems are common and there is evidence to suggest that the origins of such problems lie in infancy and childhood. In particular, research suggests that maternal psychosocial health can have a significant effect on the mother‐infant relationship, and that this in turn can have consequences for both the short and long‐term psychological health of the child. The use of parenting programmes is increasing and evidence of their effectiveness in improving outcomes for children has been provided. Evidence is now required of their effectiveness in improving outcomes for mothers.

Objectives

To address whether group‐based parenting programmes are effective in improving maternal psychosocial health including anxiety, depression, and self‐esteem.

Search methods

A range of electronic databases were searched including MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL, PsychLIT, ERIC, ASSIA, Sociofile and the Social Science Citation Index,the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and the National Research Register (NRR).

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials were included in which participants had been allocated to an experimental and a control group, the latter being a waiting‐list, no‐treatment or a placebo control group. Studies had to include at least one standardised instrument measuring maternal psychosocial health.

Data collection and analysis

A systematic critical appraisal of all included studies was undertaken using a modified version of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published criteria. Treatment effect for each outcome was standardised by dividing the mean difference in post‐intervention scores for the intervention and treatment group, by the pooled standard deviation, to produce an effect size. Where appropriate the results were combined in a meta‐analysis using a fixed‐effect model, and 95% confidence intervals were used to assess the significance of the findings.

Main results

A total of 23 studies were included in the original review which was increased to 26 at the first update (2003). 20 provided sufficient data to calculate effect sizes, providing a total of 64 assessments of aspects of psychosocial functioning including depression, anxiety, stress, self‐esteem, social competence, social support, guilt, mood, automatic thoughts, dyadic adjustment, psychiatric morbidity, irrationality, anger and aggression, mood, attitude, personality, and beliefs. Data sufficient to combine in meta‐analysis existed for only five outcomes (depression; anxiety/stress; self‐esteem; social support; and relationship with spouse/marital adjustment). Meta‐analyses showed statistically significant results favouring the intervention group for depression; anxiety/stress; self‐esteem; and relationship with spouse/marital adjustment. The meta‐analysis of the social support data showed no evidence of effectiveness. Of remaining data, approximately 22% of outcomes measured showed significant differences between the intervention and the control group. A further 40% showed non‐significant differences favouring the intervention group. Approximately one‐third of outcomes showed no evidence of effectiveness.

A meta‐analysis of follow‐up data on three outcomes ‐ depression, self‐esteem and relationship with spouse/marital adjustment ‐ was conducted. Rresults suggest a continued improvement in self‐esteem, depression, and marital adjustment at follow‐up, although the latter two findings were not statistically significant.

This review has been updated (2003) with three new included studies. The size of effect for the main outcomes has not been substantially altered by this update.

Additional sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of quasi randomised studies on the result have also been added. Where the quasi randomised studies are excluded from the analysis, the result was found to be slightly more conservative.

Authors' conclusions

It is suggested that parenting programmes can make a significant contribution to the short‐term psychosocial health of mothers; however, longterm data are lacking. .

Whilst the results of this review are positive overall, some studies showed no effect. Further research is needed to assess which factors contribute to successful outcomes in these programmes with particular attention being paid to the quality of delivery.

These results suggest that parenting programmes have a potential role to play in the promotion of mental health.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

Parent training for improving maternal psychosocial health

Parenting programmes are increasingly being used to promote the well‐being of parents and children, and this review aims to establish whether they can improve maternal psycho‐social health in particular.

The findings of the review are based on a total of 26 studies and these have been classified into five groups according to the theoretical approach underpinning the programme ‐ behavioural, cognitive‐behavioural, multi‐modal, behavioural‐humanistic and rational‐emotive therapy. The 23 studies produced a total of 64 assessments of maternal health, including measures of maternal depression, anxiety, and self‐esteem. The combined data show that parenting programmes can be effective in improving a range of aspects of maternal psychosocial functioning. While it was not possible to compare the effectiveness of the programmes in the five different categories, all of the programmes reviewed were successful in producing positive change in maternal psychosocial health.

Further research is needed to clarify some of the questions arising from this review.