Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Review - Intervention

Vaccines for preventing malaria

Version published: 20 January 2003 Version history

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000129.pub2

This review has been withdrawn

view version history

Reason for withdrawal from publication

available in

This review has been superseded by three reviews that have been published as:
Graves P, Gelband H. Vaccines for preventing malaria (SPf66). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005966. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005966.

Graves P, Gelband H. Vaccines for preventing malaria (blood‐stage). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006199. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006199.

Graves P, Gelband H. Vaccines for preventing malaria (pre‐erythrocytic). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006198. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006198.

Vaccines for preventing malaria (SPf66) published in Issue 2, 2006; Vaccines for preventing malaria (blood‐stage); and Vaccines for preventing malaria (pre‐erythrocytic) published in Issue 4, 2006.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.