Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

available in

Background

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2008.

Objectives

To assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched September 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2008), EMBASE (1980 to November 2008) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP) (1980 to November 2008). We also handsearched six relevant journals to September 2008, and searched the reference lists of articles identified.

Selection criteria

Randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted the data independently.

Main results

Ten randomised trials involving 4335 operations were included, of which 3526 were from the single largest trial (GALA). Meta‐analysis of the randomised studies showed that there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke or death (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 1.16). There was a trend towards lower operative mortality with local anaesthetic (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.07), but neither the GALA trial nor the pooled analysis were powered to detect an effect on mortality reliably.

Authors' conclusions

The risk of stroke and death did not differ significantly between the two types of anaesthetic technique during carotid endarterectomy. This review provides evidence to support a policy that patients and surgeons can choose either anaesthetic technique, depending on the clinical situation and their own preferences.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

About 20% of strokes result from narrowing of the carotid artery (the main artery supplying blood to the brain). Blood clots can form at the point of narrowing. If a blood clot breaks off into the bloodstream, it can be carried into the brain, block the blood supply there and cause a stroke. A surgical operation (carotid endarterectomy) to remove this narrowing and the blood clot can lower the risk of stroke. Even with very careful surgery, in about one in 20 patients the operation itself causes a stroke. Local rather than general anaesthesia might lower the risk of a stroke happening during surgery. This review included 10 randomised trials, involving 4335 operations, of local anaesthetic versus general anaesthetic. There was no significant difference between the anaesthetic techniques in the risk of stroke or death during, or soon after, surgery. This review therefore shows that patients and surgeons can choose either anaesthetic technique, depending on the clinical situation and their own preferences.