Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Antibiotics for sore throat

This is not the most recent version

Abstract

available in

Background

Sore throat is a common reason for people to present for medical care. Although it remits spontaneously, primary care doctors commonly prescribe antibiotics for it.

Objectives

To assess the benefits of antibiotics for sore throat for patients in primary care settings.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2011, Issue 2, which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to May week 1, 2011) and EMBASE (January 1990 to May 2011).

Selection criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi‐RCTs of antibiotics versus control assessing typical sore throat symptoms or complications.

Data collection and analysis

Two review authors independently screened studies for inclusion and extracted data. We resolved differences in opinion by discussion. We contacted trial authors from three studies for additional information.

Main results

We included 27 trials with 12,835 cases of sore throat.

1. Non‐suppurative complications
The trend was antibiotics protecting against acute glomerulonephritis but there were too few cases to be sure. Several studies found antibiotics reduced acute rheumatic fever by more than two‐thirds within one month (risk ratio (RR) 0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 2.08).

2. Suppurative complications
Antibiotics reduced the incidence of acute otitis media within 14 days (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.58); acute sinusitis within 14 days (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.08 to 2.76); and quinsy within two months (RR 0.15; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.47) compared to those taking placebo.

3. Symptoms
Throat soreness and fever were reduced by using antibiotics by about half. The greatest difference was seen at day three. The number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) to prevent one sore throat at day three was less than six; at week one it was 21.

4. Subgroup analyses of symptom reduction
Antibiotics were more effective against symptoms at day three (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.71) if throat swabs were positive for Streptococcus, compared to RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.97 if negative. Similarly at week one, RR 0.29; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.70 for positive, and 0.73; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.07 for negative Streptococcus swabs.

Authors' conclusions

Antibiotics confer relative benefits in the treatment of sore throat. However, the absolute benefits are modest. Protecting sore throat sufferers against suppurative and non‐suppurative complications in high‐income countries requires treating many with antibiotics for one to benefit. This NNTB may be lower in low‐income countries. Antibiotics shorten the duration of symptoms by about 16 hours overall.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Plain language summary

available in

Antibiotics for people with sore throats

Sore throats are infections caused by bacteria or viruses. People usually recover quickly (usually after three or four days), although some develop complications. A serious but rare complication is rheumatic fever, which affects the heart and joints. Antibiotics reduce bacterial infections but they can cause diarrhoea, rash and other adverse effects and communities build resistance to them.

This review of 27 trials with 12,835 cases of sore throat found that antibiotics shorten the illness by an average of about one day and can reduce the chance of rheumatic fever by more than two‐thirds in communities where this complication is common.