Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in people with stroke

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 29 June 2021

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012996Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 10 April 2018see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Protocol
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Stroke Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • David H Saunders

    Correspondence to: Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    [email protected]

  • Gillian E Mead

    Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  • Claire Fitzsimons

    Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  • Paul Kelly

    Physical Activity for Health Research Centre (PAHRC), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

  • Frederike van Wijck

    Institute for Applied Health Research and the School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK

  • Olaf Verschuren

    Rehabilitation Centre de Hoogstraat, Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Coralie English

    School of Health Sciences and Priority Research Centre for Stroke and Brain Injury, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia

    NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Melbourne and Newcastle, Australia

Contributions of authors

All authors had an active role in the protocol design, writing, and editing.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • New Source of support, Other.

External sources

  • No sources of support supplied

Declarations of interest

D Saunders: none known.
C Fitzsimons: none known.
P Kelly: none known.
O Verschuren: none known.
C English: none known.
GE Mead has received research funding for exercise after stroke. She has received honoraria from Later Life Training to develop an educational course of exercise after stroke for exercise professionals. She has also received honoraria and expenses to present work on exercise after stroke at conferences.
F van Wijck has received grants from Chest Heart Stroke Scotland, Edinburgh Leisure, NHS Greater Glasgow, and the Scottish Executive. She was a member of the team that developed the “Exercise after Stroke Specialist Instructor Training Course”, which was licensed to Later Life Training (LLT) in 2010. All proceeds have been going into funding further research in this area.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the assistance of the Cochrane Stroke Group in the preparation of this protocol and their Information Specialist in the design and testing of the search strategy approach.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2021 Jun 29

Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in people with stroke

Review

David H Saunders, Gillian E Mead, Claire Fitzsimons, Paul Kelly, Frederike Wijck, Olaf Verschuren, Karianne Backx, Coralie English

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012996.pub2

2018 Apr 10

Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in people with stroke

Protocol

David H Saunders, Gillian E Mead, Claire Fitzsimons, Paul Kelly, Frederike van Wijck, Olaf Verschuren, Coralie English

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012996

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.

Table 1. Outcome measures classification

Outcome

Type or Domain

Primary outcomes

Death1

Any cause

Recurrent non‐fatal events1

Cardiovascular

Cerebrovascular

Secondary outcomes

Adverse events1

Falls

Sedentary behaviour1

Time

Pattern

Other outcomes

Risk factors

Impairments

Physical fitness

Balance

Activity limitations

Specific

Generic

Participation restriction

Quality of life

Psychosocial

Mood

Fatigue

Cognition

Complications of immobility

1 Outcome categories to be included in the 'Summary of findings' table
Figures and Tables -
Table 1. Outcome measures classification
Navigate to table in Protocol
Table 2. 'Summary of Findings' table outline

Participants: people with stroke, who participated in an intervention to reduce or fragment sedentary time

Setting: Any

Intervention: Any intervention designed to reduce or fragment sedentary behaviour with or without usual care

Comparison: No intervention, attention control, sham intervention or adjunct intervention with or without usual care

Outcomes

Absolute risk

Comparative risk (95% CI)

Relative effect (95% CI)

Number of participants

(studies)

Quality of the evidence

(GRADE)

Comments

Death1

Recurrent events2

Adverse events3

Sedentary behaviour4

CI: Confidence Interval, GRADE: Grades of evidence as per Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group

1 Death by any cause

2 Non‐fatal cerebrovascular or cardiovascular events

3 Number of falls

4 Wake time spent lying/sitting/reclining or degree of fragmentation of sedentary time, recorded by any tool.

Figures and Tables -
Table 2. 'Summary of Findings' table outline
Navigate to table in Protocol