Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 1 Caesarean section for fetal distress.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 1 Caesarean section for fetal distress.

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 2 Apgar score < 7 at 5 min.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 2 Apgar score < 7 at 5 min.

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 3 Oxytocin administration.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 3 Oxytocin administration.

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 4 Neonatal admission to NICU.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control), Outcome 4 Neonatal admission to NICU.

Comparison 1. Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control)

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Caesarean section for fetal distress Show forest plot

1

883

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.02 [1.08, 3.77]

2 Apgar score < 7 at 5 min Show forest plot

1

883

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.39 [0.54, 3.63]

3 Oxytocin administration Show forest plot

1

883

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.57 [1.32, 1.87]

4 Neonatal admission to NICU Show forest plot

1

883

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)

1.03 [0.66, 1.63]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Sonographic measured AFI on admission (intervention) versus no sonographic assessment of AFI (control)