Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 1 Prosthesis failure.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 1 Prosthesis failure.

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 2 Implant failure.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.2

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 2 Implant failure.

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 3 Complications.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.3

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 3 Complications.

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 4 Aesthetics (dentist): interproximal papilla dimension.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.4

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 4 Aesthetics (dentist): interproximal papilla dimension.

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 5 Aesthetics (dentist): position of the perimplant tissues.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.5

Comparison 1 Immediate versus delayed implants, Outcome 5 Aesthetics (dentist): position of the perimplant tissues.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 1 Prosthesis failure.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 1 Prosthesis failure.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 2 Implant failure.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.2

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 2 Implant failure.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 3 Complications.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.3

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 3 Complications.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 4 Patients' perception of how long treatment took.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.4

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 4 Patients' perception of how long treatment took.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 5 Patients' aesthetic perception.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.5

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 5 Patients' aesthetic perception.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 6 Patients' general satisfaction of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.6

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 6 Patients' general satisfaction of treatment.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 7 Aesthetics (dentist): interproximal papilla dimension.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.7

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 7 Aesthetics (dentist): interproximal papilla dimension.

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 8 Aesthetics (dentist): position of the perimplant tissues.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.8

Comparison 2 Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants, Outcome 8 Aesthetics (dentist): position of the perimplant tissues.

Comparison 1. Immediate versus delayed implants

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Prosthesis failure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Implant failure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Complications Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Aesthetics (dentist): interproximal papilla dimension Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Aesthetics (dentist): position of the perimplant tissues Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Immediate versus delayed implants
Comparison 2. Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 Prosthesis failure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

2 Implant failure Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

3 Complications Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

4 Patients' perception of how long treatment took Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

5 Patients' aesthetic perception Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

6 Patients' general satisfaction of treatment Show forest plot

1

Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

7 Aesthetics (dentist): interproximal papilla dimension Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

8 Aesthetics (dentist): position of the perimplant tissues Show forest plot

1

Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)

Totals not selected

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Immediate‐delayed versus delayed implants