Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Éducation à la sécurité domestique et fourniture d'équipements de sécurité pour la prévention des accidents

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 12 September 2012see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Injuries Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2014 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Denise Kendrick

    Correspondence to: Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    [email protected]

  • Ben Young

    Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Amanda J Mason‐Jones

    Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

  • Nohaid Ilyas

    Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Felix A Achana

    Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  • Nicola J Cooper

    Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  • Stephanie J Hubbard

    Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  • Alex J Sutton

    Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

  • Sherie Smith

    Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Persephone Wynn

    Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Caroline A Mulvaney

    School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Michael C Watson

    School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

  • Carol Coupland

    Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Contributions of authors

DK had the idea for the review, drafted the protocol and the funding application, contributed to study selection, data extraction, developing the statistical models for assessing the effect of the covariates and the analyses, and drafted the final report. CC contributed to study selection, developing the statistical models for assessing the effect of the covariates and to drafting the protocol, the funding application and the final report. CM contributed to study selection, quality assessment and drafting the protocol, the funding application and the final report. SS contributed to the searches, quality assessment and drafting the protocol and the final report. AJS developed the statistical models for assessing the effect of the covariates and contributed to drafting the protocol, the funding application and the final report. MW contributed to study selection and drafting the protocol, the funding application and the final report. AM‐J (nee AW) contributed to study selection, quality assessment, the analyses and drafting the protocol, the funding application and the final report. BY contributed to the analysis and drafting the final report. PW and NI contributed to study selection, data extraction, quality assessment and drafting of the final report. NJC contributed to the funding application, drafting the protocol, the analysis and drafting the final report. FAA and SJH contributed to drafting the protocol, the analysis and drafting of the final report.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • University of Nottingham, UK.

  • University of Leicester, UK.

External sources

  • Department of Health, UK.

  • National Institute for Health Research, UK.

    This study was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP‐PG‐0407‐10231).The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

Declarations of interest

Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland, Michael Watson, Caroline Mulvaney and Amanda Mason‐Jones are authors of some of the studies included in this review.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Jayne Simpson for selecting studies for inclusion, extracting data and contributing to drafting the report for the original review.

We would like to thank the following authors for providing the IPD (*) and unpublished data (§) which were used in the analyses presented in this report:

M Bulzachelli *§, P Dawson §, C DiGuiesppi *§, K Georgieff §, A Gielen *§, D Girasek §, S Hendrickson *§, D Kendrick *§ (plus provided IPD on behalf of M Clamp), D Kolko *§, R McClure § (on behalf of E Yorkston), E McDonald *, T Nansel *§, T Ohn §, E Petridou *§, K Phelen*§, J Posner *§, I Roberts *§ (on behalf of D Rowland), D Schwebel *§, L Swart *§, M Sznajder *, N Tan *§, E Wald § (on behalf of S Sangvai), M Watson*§, B Ytterstad §

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2012 Sep 12

Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention

Review

Denise Kendrick, Ben Young, Amanda J Mason‐Jones, Nohaid Ilyas, Felix A Achana, Nicola J Cooper, Stephanie J Hubbard, Alex J Sutton, Sherie Smith, Persephone Wynn, Caroline A Mulvaney, Michael C Watson, Carol Coupland

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub3

2007 Jan 24

Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention

Review

Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland, Amanda J Mason‐Jones, Caroline Mulvaney, Jayne Simpson, Sherie Smith, Alex Sutton, Michael Watson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005014.pub2

2004 Oct 18

Home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention

Protocol

Denise Kendrick, Carol Coupland, Caroline Mulvaney, Jayne Simpson, Sherie J Smith, Alex Sutton, Michael Watson, Amanda Woods

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005014

Notes

This work was undertaken by The University of Nottingham, which received funding from the Department of Health and the National Institute for Health Research. This review presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP‐PG‐0407‐10231). The views expressed in this review are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.