Limpieza de la herida en las úlceras por presión
Information
- DOI:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004983.pub3Copy DOI
- Database:
-
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Version published:
-
- 28 March 2013see what's new
- Type:
-
- Intervention
- Stage:
-
- Review
- Cochrane Editorial Group:
-
Cochrane Wounds Group
- Copyright:
-
- Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Article metrics
Altmetric:
Cited by:
Authors
Contributions of authors
Protocol and review development ‐ Zena Moore
Commenting on draft of protocol and review ‐ Seamus Cowman
Review of search results, abstracts of articles and full text ‐ Zena Moore, Seamus Cowman
Review and data extraction of articles ‐ Zena Moore, Seamus Cowman,
Writing the review and the subsequent updates ‐ Zena Moore.
Contributions of editorial base:
Nicky Cullum: edited the review, advised on methodology, interpretation and review content. Approved the final review and review update prior to submission.
Sally Bell‐Syer: coordinated the editorial process. Advised on methodology, interpretation and content. Edited the review and the updated review.
Ruth Foxlee: designed the search strategy, ran the searches and edited the search methods section for the update.
Sources of support
Internal sources
-
The Faculty Board, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, RCSI, Dublin 2, Ireland.
-
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland.
External sources
-
Health Research Board, Ireland.
-
NIHR/Department of Health (England), (Cochrane Wounds Group), UK.
Declarations of interest
The author, Zena Moore, is a member of the medical advisory board of Systagenix Wound Management. The author, Zena Moore, has received an honorarium for speaking at professional meetings for KCI, ConvaTec, Systagenix Wound Management, Fanin Health Care and Smith & Nephew.
Seamus Cowman ‐ none known.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Susan O'Meara and Sally Bell‐Syer particularly, for their invaluable help, advice and support in the conduct of this review. The authors would also like to thank the Cochrane Wounds Group referees (Jacqui Fletcher, Nerys Woolacott) and Coordinating Editor (Nicky Cullum) for their comments on the review, Ruth Foxlee (TSC) for undertaking the searches for the update and Sally Stapley for support though the second update. Finally, the authors are grateful to Adrianna Castelli, Wu Taixing and Ikumi Iwama for their assistance with article translation and data extraction.
Version history
| Published | Title | Stage | Authors | Version |
| 2013 Mar 28 | Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers | Review | Zena EH Moore, Seamus Cowman | |
| 2005 Oct 19 | Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers | Review | Zena EH Moore, Seamus Cowman | |
| 2004 Oct 18 | Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers | Protocol | Zena EH Moore, Seamus Cowman | |
Keywords
MeSH
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Keywords
Medical Subject Headings Check Words
Humans;
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
Comparison 1 Different cleansing techniques, Outcome 1 Pulsatile Lavage versus sham.
Comparison 2 Different cleansing solutions, Outcome 1 Saline versus tap water.
| Intervention | PSST Baseline | PSST Day 7 | PSST Day 14 | Total % Change |
| Isotonic saline solution (control) | mean 31.6 (SD 10.3, min 15.0, max 52.0) | 28.9 (SD 10.5, min 12.0, max 52.0). | 25.3 (SD 12.2, min 10.0, max 50.0). | ‐20.5 (SD 24.1, min ‐65.8, max 22.7). |
| Saline spray, Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) (intervention) | mean 31.3 (SD 11.5, min 13.0 max 56.0) | 27.1 (SD 11.1, min 13.0, max 54.0). | 21.6 (SD 11.6, min 10.0, max 51,0). | ‐27.8 (SD 31.3, min ‐69.8, max 123.5). |
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
| 1 Pulsatile Lavage versus sham Show forest plot | 1 | Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 1.1 Changes in Volume | 1 | Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] | |
| Outcome or subgroup title | No. of studies | No. of participants | Statistical method | Effect size |
| 1 Saline versus tap water Show forest plot | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | Totals not selected | |
| 1.1 Healed wound within 6 weeks | 1 | Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) | 0.0 [0.0, 0.0] | |
