Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Comparison 1 Compound Dan Shen versus Control, Outcome 1 improvement with neurological deficit at the end of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 1.1

Comparison 1 Compound Dan Shen versus Control, Outcome 1 improvement with neurological deficit at the end of treatment.

Comparison 2 Subgroup analysis, divided by treatment type, Outcome 1 improvement with neurological deficit at the end of treatment.
Figures and Tables -
Analysis 2.1

Comparison 2 Subgroup analysis, divided by treatment type, Outcome 1 improvement with neurological deficit at the end of treatment.

Comparison 1. Compound Dan Shen versus Control

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 improvement with neurological deficit at the end of treatment Show forest plot

3

304

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.72 [1.10, 6.72]

1.1 MESSS

2

166

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.12 [1.05, 9.25]

1.2 Defined by the trialists' own definition

1

138

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.00 [0.39, 10.20]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 1. Compound Dan Shen versus Control
Comparison 2. Subgroup analysis, divided by treatment type

Outcome or subgroup title

No. of studies

No. of participants

Statistical method

Effect size

1 improvement with neurological deficit at the end of treatment Show forest plot

3

304

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.72 [1.10, 6.72]

1.1 Compound Dan Shen injection

2

234

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

2.02 [0.54, 7.62]

1.2 Compound Dan Shen dropping pill

1

70

Peto Odds Ratio (Peto, Fixed, 95% CI)

3.52 [1.02, 12.10]

Figures and Tables -
Comparison 2. Subgroup analysis, divided by treatment type