Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 31 January 2013see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:
  1. Cochrane Neonatal Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Susan E Jacobs

    Correspondence to: Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia

    [email protected]

  • Marie Berg

    Division of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, USA

  • Rod Hunt

    Department of Neonatal Medicine, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia

  • William O Tarnow‐Mordi

    Department of Neonatal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia

  • Terrie E Inder

    Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Radiology, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University, St. Louis, USA

  • Peter G Davis

    Department of Newborn Research, The Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia

Contributions of authors

Sue Jacobs: responsible for all aspects of review ‐ search, data abstraction, entry and analysis; manuscript and editing of review.

Rod Hunt: data abstraction and reviewed manuscript.

William Tarnow‐Mordi: reviewed manuscript.

Terrie Inder: reviewed manuscript.

Peter Davis: data abstraction and entry, manuscript preparation.

2012 update:

New contributor: Marie Berg: updated methods and objectives, identified new studies for inclusion, abstracted and entered data from these new studies, drafted new results and discussion based on added information.

Sue Jacobs: identified new studies for inclusion, abstracted and provided additional data, provided commentary and critical review of manuscript.

Rod Hunt: data abstraction and critical review of manuscript.

Peter Davis: data abstraction and critical review of manuscript.

William Tarnow‐Mordi: commentary and critical review of manuscript and data.

Terrie Inder: reviewed manuscript and provided commentary.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology and Radiology, St Louis Childrens Hospital, University of Washington, USA.

  • Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Australia.

External sources

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.

    Editorial support of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group has been funded with Federal funds from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA, under Contract No. HHSN275201100016C.

Declarations of interest

Dr Sue Jacobs is the principal investigator for one of the included randomised controlled trials, the Infant Cooling Evaluation (ICE) trial.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the authors of the included studies, particularly Malcolm Battin, Dorothy Jenkins, Alistair Gunn and Seetha Shankaran for the NICHD Neonatal Research Network, who clarified existing data and provided us with additional information. We also thank Diantha Howard for her assistance with the uncertainty analysis.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2013 Jan 31

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Review

Susan E Jacobs, Marie Berg, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow‐Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub3

2007 Oct 17

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Review

Susan E Jacobs, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow‐Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003311.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Cooling for newborns with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy

Review

Susan E Jacobs, Rod Hunt, William O Tarnow‐Mordi, Terrie E Inder, Peter G Davis

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003311

Differences between protocol and review

Modifications were made to the protocol in both the Objectives and Methods. For the Objectives, the inclusion criteria were modified to exclude infants < 35 weeks' gestation and cooling initiated after six hours. These modifications were made in order to streamline the review as data emerge on cooling in infants < 35 weeks' gestation and who undergo later cooling and to improve generalisability of results. As such, the Objectives were modified to remove the category "Inclusion criteria: term or late preterm (≥ 35 weeks' gestation) infants versus more preterm (< 35 weeks' gestation)" and the Methods section "Types of participants" was modified to include infants "35 weeks' gestation or greater." It is well‐described in animal models that the effectiveness of hypothermia is dramatically reduced when initiated after six hours of life (Gunn 1998), although studies are emerging (Li 2009) exploring the use of late hypothermia. As data emerge in this field, it is felt that this will warrant a separate review. Therefore, the Objectives were modified to remove the category "Timing of commencement of intervention (< three hours versus three to six hours versus more than six hours)". The Methods section "Types of interventions" was modified to include cooling initiated prior to six hours after birth. Given that infants undergoing head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia may have relatively higher core temperatures but lower intranasal and scalp temperatures than infants treated with whole body cooling, it is difficult to compare temperatures in these treatment modalities in a meaningful way. Therefore, the Objectives were modified to remove "Degree of cooling (core temperature ≤ 34.5 °C versus > 34.5 °C)." In addition, Objective 1 (Severity of HIE) was modified to include both clinical staging of encephalopathy and staging based on baseline aEEG findings.

Additional changes to the Methods included clarification of definitions for secondary outcomes, additions to secondary outcomes and changes in the pre‐specified outcomes reported. Definitions were clarified for "Any coagulopathy" and "Renal impairment." The outcome "Seizure" was modified to include both seizures during the initial hospitalisation and at follow‐up. Three additional outcomes were added, as they were felt to be clinically important.  These were 'outcome at six to seven years,' 'hepatic dysfunction,' and 'persistent pulmonary hypertension,' which also included the outcome 'requiring inhaled NO.  For 'outcome at six to seven years,' both mortality and multiple neurodevelopmental findings are reported. Additionally, the outcome 'days to sucking feeds' was modified to the more binary 'need for gavage feeds at time of discharge. The outcome 'diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) on early MRI (< day 4)' and 'basal ganglia, posterior limb of internal capsule (PLIC) and/or white matter (WM) injury, parasagittal neuronal necrosis on late MRI (> day 4) were replaced with 'MRI abnormalities (moderate or severe abnormalities in the basal ganglia or thalamus, severe white matter lesions or abnormalities in the posterior limb of the internal capsule).' 

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.