Scolaris Content Display Scolaris Content Display

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

This is not the most recent version

view the current version 08 September 2023

Information

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001888Copy DOI
Database:
  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Version published:
  1. 20 October 2003see what's new
Type:
  1. Intervention
Stage:
  1. Review
Cochrane Editorial Group:

  1. Cochrane Injuries Group

Copyright:
  1. Copyright © 2006 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Article metrics

Altmetric:

Cited by:

Cited 0 times via Crossref Cited-by Linking

Collapse

Authors

  • Paul A Carless

    Correspondence to: Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia

    [email protected]

  • David A Henry

    Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Waratah, Australia

  • Annette J Moxey

    Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia

  • Dianne O'Connell

    Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, Cancer Research and Registers Division, The Cancer Council NSW, Australia

  • Tamara Brown

    University of Manchester, Other

  • Dean A Fergusson

    Ottawa Health Research Institute / University of Ottawa Centre for Transfusion Research, Ottawa, Canada

Contributions of authors

Contributors (names are listed alphabetically)

Paul Carless (University of Newcastle) obtained relevant papers, applied inclusion/ exclusion criteria to retrieved papers, quality assessed trials, extracted data from the trials, entered data into MetaView 4.1, entered all study details into Review Manager 4.1 and co‐wrote review; David Henry (University of Newcastle) obtained funding for the study, was involved in study design, screened abstracts and titles for relevant articles, and co‐wrote review; Annette Moxey (University of Newcastle) obtained relevant papers, applied inclusion/ exclusion criteria to retrieved papers, quality assessed trials, extracted data from the trials and entered data into MetaView 4.1; Dianne O'Connell (University of Newcastle) provided statistical consultancy for the review, checked data for consistency and provided methodological content.

Sources of support

Internal sources

  • Research Management Committee, The University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia. Special purpose grant, Hunter Area Pathology Services, NSW, Australia.

External sources

  • Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Committee. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Australia.

Declarations of interest

None known.

Version history

Published

Title

Stage

Authors

Version

2023 Sep 08

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion in adults undergoing elective surgery

Review

Thomas D Lloyd, Louise J Geneen, Keeley Bernhardt, William McClune, Scott J Fernquest, Tamara Brown, Carolyn Dorée, Susan J Brunskill, Michael F Murphy, Antony JR Palmer

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub5

2010 Apr 14

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

Review

Paul A Carless, David A Henry, Annette J Moxey, Dianne O'Connell, Tamara Brown, Dean A Fergusson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub4

2010 Mar 17

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

Review

Paul A Carless, David A Henry, Annette J Moxey, Dianne O'Connell, Tamara Brown, Dean A Fergusson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub3

2006 Oct 18

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

Review

Paul A Carless, David A Henry, Annette J Moxey, Dianne O'Connell, Tamara Brown, Dean A Fergusson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001888.pub2

2003 Oct 20

Cell salvage for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

Review

Paul A Carless, David A Henry, Annette J Moxey, Dianne O'Connell, Tamara Brown, Dean A Fergusson

https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001888

PICOs

Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome

The PICO model is widely used and taught in evidence-based health care as a strategy for formulating questions and search strategies and for characterizing clinical studies or meta-analyses. PICO stands for four different potential components of a clinical question: Patient, Population or Problem; Intervention; Comparison; Outcome.

See more on using PICO in the Cochrane Handbook.